Iron Wall (essay)
He wrote the essay after the British Colonial Secretary Winston Churchill prohibited Zionist settlement on the east bank of the Jordan River, and formed the Zionist Revisionist party after writing it.
Jabotinsky argued that the Palestinian Arabs would not agree to a Jewish majority in Palestine, and that "Zionist colonisation must either stop, or else proceed regardless of the native population. Which means that it can proceed and develop only under the protection of a power that is independent of the native population – behind an iron wall, which the native population cannot breach." The only solution to achieve peace and a Jewish state in the Land of Israel, he argued, would be for Jews to first establish a strong Jewish state, which would eventually prompt the Arabs to "drop their extremist leaders, whose watchword is ‘never!’ and pass the leadership to the moderate groups, who will approach us with a proposal that we should both agree to mutual concessions."
A week following the publication of this essay, Jabotinsky followed with "The Ethics of the Iron Wall," in which he argued that morality comes before everything else, and that Zionism is "moral and just," since it subscribes to "national self-determination" as a "sacred principle," which Arabs may also enjoy.
- Lustick, Ian S. (2007). "Abandoning the Iron Wall: Israel and "The Middle Eastern Muck"". Middle East Policy (Fall 2007).
- Abulof, Uriel (2014). "National Ethics in Ethnic Conflicts: The Zionist "Iron Wall" and the "Arab Question"". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 37 (14): 2653–2669. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.854921.
|This Israel-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|
|This Palestine-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|