Indian Councils Act 1861
After the War of Independence, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan advised the British Government to take Indian nationals into the administration of India. He argued in his pamphlet The Causes of the Indian Revolt that the failure of the British to admit Indians into the Legislative Council, prevented them from having any say in government policies that touched them directly and was the major cause behind the revolt. The Indian Councils Act 1861 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that transformed India's executive council to function as a cabinet run on the portfolio system. This cabinet had six "ordinary members", who each took charge of a separate department in Calcutta's government: home, revenue, military, law, finance, and (after 1874) public works. The military Commander-in-Chief sat in with the council as an extraordinary member. The Executive Council was enlarged by addition of fifth member. The Viceroy was allowed, under the provisions of the Act, to overrule the council on affairs if he deemed it necessary, as was the case in 1879, during the tenure of Lord Lyton.
|Long title||An Act to make better Provision for the Constitution of the Council of the Governor General of India, and for the Local Government of the several Presidencies and Provinces of India, and for the temporary Government of India in the event of a Vacancy in the Office of Governor General.|
|Royal assent||1 August 1861|
|Repealed by||Government of India Act 1915|
The Viceroy was allowed to issue ordinances lasting six months if the Legislative Council is not in session in an emergency.
The Secretary of State for India, Sir Charles Wood, believed that the Act was of immense importance: "the act is a great experiment. That everything is changing in India is obvious enough, and that the old autocratic government cannot stand unmodified is indisputable."
The 1861 Act restored the legislative powers of Bombay and Madras Presidencies taken away by the Charter Act of 1833. The legislative council at Calcutta was given extensive authority to pass laws for British India as a whole, but the legislative councils at Bombay and Madras were given the power to make laws for the "Peace and good Government" for only their respective presidencies.The Governor General was given the power to create new provinces for legislative purposes and could appoint Lieutenant Governors for the provinces.
However, from India's point of view, the act did little to improve the influence of Indians in the legislative council. The role of council was limited to advice, and no financial discussion could take place...
- Indian Polity, by M Laxmikanth
- Short title as conferred by s. 1 of the Act; the modern convention for the citation of short titles omits the initial "The", ignores the italicisation of "Indian", and omits the comma after the word "Act".
- Encyclopædia Britannica article concerning this Act
- Sen, S. N. (2006). History Modern India. New Delhi: Newage International. p. 110. ISBN 81-224-1774-4.
- "History of State Legislature". Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennei. Archived from the original on 13 April 2010. Retrieved 11 February 2010.
|This article about the law of India is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|