Hills and Co. v. Hoover, 220 U.S. 329 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held the owner of a copyright is restricted to a single action against another to find, seize, and seek penalties for allegedly infringing copies of a work.[1]
| Hills and Co. v. Hoover | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 15–16, 1911 Decided April 3, 1911 | |
| Full case name | Hills and Company, Limited v. Hoover |
| Citations | 220 U.S. 329 (more) 31 S. Ct. 402; 55 L. Ed. 485 |
| Holding | |
| The owner of a copyright is restricted to a single action against another to find, seize, and seek penalties for allegedly infringing copies of a work. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Day, joined by unanimous |
References edit
External links edit
- Text of Hills and Co. v. Hoover, 220 U.S. 329 (1911) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Findlaw Justia Library of Congress
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |