In mathematics, the free factor complex (sometimes also called the complex of free factors) is a free group counterpart of the notion of the curve complex of a finite type surface. The free factor complex was originally introduced in a 1998 paper of Allen Hatcher and Karen Vogtmann.[1] Like the curve complex, the free factor complex is known to be Gromov-hyperbolic. The free factor complex plays a significant role in the study of large-scale geometry of .

Formal definition

edit

For a free group   a proper free factor of   is a subgroup   such that   and that there exists a subgroup   such that  .

Let   be an integer and let   be the free group of rank  . The free factor complex   for   is a simplicial complex where:

(1) The 0-cells are the conjugacy classes in   of proper free factors of  , that is

 

(2) For  , a  -simplex in   is a collection of   distinct 0-cells   such that there exist free factors   of   such that   for  , and that  . [The assumption that these 0-cells are distinct implies that   for  ]. In particular, a 1-cell is a collection   of two distinct 0-cells where   are proper free factors of   such that  .

For   the above definition produces a complex with no  -cells of dimension  . Therefore,   is defined slightly differently. One still defines   to be the set of conjugacy classes of proper free factors of  ; (such free factors are necessarily infinite cyclic). Two distinct 0-simplices   determine a 1-simplex in   if and only if there exists a free basis   of   such that  . The complex   has no  -cells of dimension  .

For   the 1-skeleton   is called the free factor graph for  .

Main properties

edit
  • For every integer   the complex   is connected, locally infinite, and has dimension  . The complex   is connected, locally infinite, and has dimension 1.
  • For  , the graph   is isomorphic to the Farey graph.
  • There is a natural action of   on   by simplicial automorphisms. For a k-simplex   and   one has  .
  • For   the complex   has the homotopy type of a wedge of spheres of dimension  .[1]
  • For every integer  , the free factor graph  , equipped with the simplicial metric (where every edge has length 1), is a connected graph of infinite diameter.[2][3]
  • For every integer  , the free factor graph  , equipped with the simplicial metric, is Gromov-hyperbolic. This result was originally established by Mladen Bestvina and Mark Feighn;[4] see also [5][6] for subsequent alternative proofs.
  • An element   acts as a loxodromic isometry of   if and only if   is fully irreducible.[4]
  • There exists a coarsely Lipschitz coarsely  -equivariant coarsely surjective map  , where   is the free splittings complex. However, this map is not a quasi-isometry. The free splitting complex is also known to be Gromov-hyperbolic, as was proved by Handel and Mosher.[7]
  • Similarly, there exists a natural coarsely Lipschitz coarsely  -equivariant coarsely surjective map  , where   is the (volume-ones normalized) Culler–Vogtmann Outer space, equipped with the symmetric Lipschitz metric. The map   takes a geodesic path in   to a path in   contained in a uniform Hausdorff neighborhood of the geodesic with the same endpoints.[4]
  • The hyperbolic boundary   of the free factor graph can be identified with the set of equivalence classes of "arational"  -trees in the boundary   of the Outer space  .[8]
  • The free factor complex is a key tool in studying the behavior of random walks on   and in identifying the Poisson boundary of  .[9]

Other models

edit

There are several other models which produce graphs coarsely  -equivariantly quasi-isometric to  . These models include:

  • The graph whose vertex set is   and where two distinct vertices   are adjacent if and only if there exists a free product decomposition   such that   and  .
  • The free bases graph whose vertex set is the set of  -conjugacy classes of free bases of  , and where two vertices   are adjacent if and only if there exist free bases   of   such that   and  .[5]

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Hatcher, Allen; Vogtmann, Karen (1998). "The complex of free factors of a free group". Quarterly Journal of Mathematics. Series 2. 49 (196): 459–468. arXiv:2203.15602. doi:10.1093/qmathj/49.4.459.
  2. ^ Kapovich, Ilya; Lustig, Martin (2009). "Geometric intersection number and analogues of the curve complex for free groups". Geometry & Topology. 13 (3): 1805–1833. arXiv:0711.3806. doi:10.2140/gt.2009.13.1805.
  3. ^ Behrstock, Jason; Bestvina, Mladen; Clay, Matt (2010). "Growth of intersection numbers for free group automorphisms". Journal of Topology. 3 (2): 280–310. arXiv:0806.4975. doi:10.1112/jtopol/jtq008.
  4. ^ a b c Bestvina, Mladen; Feighn, Mark (2014). "Hyperbolicity of the complex of free factors". Advances in Mathematics. 256: 104–155. arXiv:1107.3308. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2014.02.001.
  5. ^ a b Kapovich, Ilya; Rafi, Kasra (2014). "On hyperbolicity of free splitting and free factor complexes". Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics. 8 (2): 391–414. arXiv:1206.3626. doi:10.4171/GGD/231.
  6. ^ Hilion, Arnaud; Horbez, Camille (2017). "The hyperbolicity of the sphere complex via surgery paths". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 730: 135–161. arXiv:1210.6183. doi:10.1515/crelle-2014-0128.
  7. ^ Handel, Michael; Mosher, Lee (2013). "The free splitting complex of a free group, I: hyperbolicity". Geometry & Topology. 17 (3): 1581–1672. arXiv:1111.1994. doi:10.2140/gt.2013.17.1581. MR 3073931.
  8. ^ Bestvina, Mladen; Reynolds, Patrick (2015). "The boundary of the complex of free factors". Duke Mathematical Journal. 164 (11): 2213–2251. arXiv:1211.3608. doi:10.1215/00127094-3129702.
  9. ^ Horbez, Camille (2016). "The Poisson boundary of  ". Duke Mathematical Journal. 165 (2): 341–369. arXiv:1405.7938. doi:10.1215/00127094-3166308.

See also

edit