Why are they always blurry and hard to make out? --Opacic (talk) 11:16, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- This is higher quality than anything on the UFO documentation sites, which suggests that not even they find it convincing. Should it be deleted? User:Kwamikagami (talk) 23:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hello User talk:Kwamikagami, Who/Whom is "they"? And can you cite a reference to this statment "not even they find it convincing". Best Regards Vufors (talk) 06:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Don't even joke about deleting, we have very few free photographies of actual UFOs, see the category at commons --Enric Naval (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Oh, I see, you were talking the doubts about the image being manufactured for wikipedia --Enric Naval (talk) 16:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)- what the hell??!!! you want to delete the best ufo picture around under false claims and accusations...of course...you have not a shred of evidence for this. i don't want to sound crazy and fringe...but you guys behave like government paid agents who want to eliminate every good evidence available...such as this picture. and this comes from an admin...shame on you! this image has a proper license tag and you know that...but yet you are desperately searching for reasons to get rid of it...even if those reasons are ridiculous and totally invalid! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.84.19.26 (talk) 18:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Similar images are available here (click on the pictures to find one identical to this one and a similar one, both with the same disclaimer), here (with a youtube video of the incident) here (link to a italian documentary). I don't think that the images were done in purpose for wikipedia. --Enric Naval (talk) 22:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- So we can conclude that the image doesn't break any rules and can stay. It should have been obvious from the beginning because the uploader provided the source and the rationale...there was no problem from the beginning. period. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.84.19.26 (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Looks very wiki to me. It fulfils all wiki conditions = Safe. Regards Vufors (talk) 03:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
