File talk:Golden Globe Trophy.jpg

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Tbhotch in topic Replaceable?
WikiProject iconAwards File‑class
WikiProject iconThis file is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
FileThis file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Replaceable? edit

I'm not sure whether I understand the "Replaceable?" criterion directly. Does it say that it's not permitted to take a photo of the trophy because it is under copyright? Or does it say that nobody has yet taken a photo and then released it under a free license? Because if it's the latter, and I suspect it is, the rationale fails this criterion. That is, the photo must be deleted as it is in fact replaceable. Schwede66 02:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

"This is a two-dimensional representation of a copyrighted sculpture, statue or any other three-dimensional work of art. As such it is a derivative work of art, and per US Copyright Act of 1976, § 106(2) whoever holds copyright of the original has the exclusive right to authorize derivative works.". (CC) Tbhotch 04:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Aha. Thanks. I see that US copyright applies.
What happens when one of these leaves the US? Local copyright law would apply, wouldn't it? For example, in New Zealand, three-dimensional art is subject to copyright unless it's a permanent installation. Suppose somebody's Golden Globe ends up in a New Zealand museum as a permanent display. Arguably, FOP would apply in that case and anyone could take a photo that could then be freely licensed.
I suggest that at best, the "Replaceable?" criterion is rather shaky if it applies to a mass-produced trophy that's gone all over the world. Schwede66 08:15, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Since Wikipedia is located in the US, NZ and US laws apply to the subject, because it is registered in the US. The picture would be an acceptable CC-SA picture, but it would still need to be tagged as fair use. The picture can be replaced with a free one (merely not to use a copyrighted picture), but, as long as the subject is copyrighted, the HFPA holds its 2D and 3D rights in the US, similar to File:Trump Baby Balloon at protest in Parliament Square.jpg. It will all depend on how permanent is permanent. (CC) Tbhotch 14:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Also, take into consideration who would donate the statuette, the author or the award winner. (CC) Tbhotch 14:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply