File talk:En-dust-514-20200903.ogg

Spoken article quality assessment

Version reviewed: This revision

---

Technical quality: High

---

Clarity: Medium

---

Accuracy: High

---

Notes: Great audio quality, the extermely minor popping was not a problem. The article could be read a bit faster, and the pacing alternated throughout the article. Overall, great job!

---

Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.

Reviewed by: — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 17:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)