This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2020) |
Exposure latitude is the extent to which a light-sensitive material can be exposed (overexposed or underexposed) and still achieve an acceptable result.[1] This measure is used for digital and analogue processes, e.g. optical microlithography or photography.
Applications
editIn the case of optical microlithography this value statistically describes the response of a photoresist to radiation and defines the process window where the photolithographic process can vary within (e.g. how well it compensates for spatial non-uniformities of the illumination). In the case of photography, an artistic case, the measurement of exposure latitude is, by definition dependent on both personal aesthetics and artistic intentions, somewhat subjective. However, the relative differences between media are generally agreed upon: reversal film tends to have very little latitude, while colour negative film has considerably more. Digital sensors vary.
It is not to be confused with dynamic range, the range of light intensities a medium can capture simultaneously. A recording medium with greater dynamic range will be able to record more details in the dark and light areas of a picture. Latitude depends on dynamic range. If the same scene can be recorded using less than the full brightness range available to the medium, the exposure can be shifted along the range without losing information in the shadows or highlights. Greater exposure latitude allows one to compensate for errors in exposure while retaining quality.
In radiography, exposure latitude and dynamic range are equivalent.[2][3] It is the range of exposures that can be recorded as useful densities on a radiographic film for interpretation.[4] In film-screen radiography, exposure latitude range from 10:1 to 100:1. In digital chest radiography, exposure latitude can more than 100:1. In computed radiography, the exposure latitude can reach 10,000:1.[3] High X-ray beam energy will increase the exposure latitude.[2] High intrinsic subject contrast, as in chest radiography, requires wide latitude to differentiate various tissues in the mediastinum and lesions in the lungs. Low intrinsic subject contrast, as in mammography, requires narrow latitude to increase contrast between the different breast tissues or any lesion within them.[5]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "Exposure latitude in film photography". www.basiccameraphotography.com. Archived from the original on 18 May 2021. Retrieved 7 September 2020.
- ^ a b "Chapter 2:General Screen Film Radiography and Its Limitations" (PDF). University of Sydney. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2023. Retrieved 28 February 2023.
- ^ a b Williams, Mark B.; Krupinski, Elizabeth A.; Strauss, Keith J.; Breeden, William K.; Rzeszotarski, Mark S.; Applegate, Kimberly; Wyatt, Margaret; Bjork, Sandra; Seibert, J. Anthony (June 2007). "Digital Radiography Image Quality: Image Acquisition". Journal of the American College of Radiology. 4 (6): 371–388. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2007.02.002. PMID 17544139. S2CID 18266292.
- ^ Serman, N (August 2000). "Image characteristics" (PDF). Columbia University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 January 2018. Retrieved 28 February 2023.
- ^ Allisy-Roberts, PJ; Williams, J (14 November 2007). Farr's Physics for Medical Imaging. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 69. ISBN 9780702028441. Retrieved 28 February 2023.
 | This photography-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |