Wikipedia

Duxhurst Industrial Farm Colony

Duxhurst Industrial Farm Colony (1922, Lady Henry Somerset Homes; 1923, Princess Marie Louise Village for Gentlefolk)[2] was a British voluntary in-patient residential institution for the treatment and cure of habitual alcoholic women. It was founded in 1895 at Duxhurst, near Reigate, Surrey, England, by Lady Henry Somerset.[3] Lady Henry was the first woman in England to pay attention to the inebriety of women, and she founded, at Duxhurst, the first industrial farm colony for alcoholic women.[4] Using gender-specific religious treatment, Duxhurst was the largest of the retreat institutions in England in its day.[5] It was funded by Lady Henry with contributions from the National British Women's Temperance Association (B.W.T.A.) and the World's Woman's Christian Temperance Union (W.WC.T.U.).[6]

Duxhurst Industrial Farm Colony
Motto"To comfort and help the weak-hearted, and to raise up them that fall."[1]
Founder(s)Lady Henry Somerset
Established1895
Missiontreatment and cure of habitual alcoholics
Focuswomen
Location
Duxhurst, near Reigate, Surrey, England
Dissolved1922
Funded by
The Calvary
The well
Hospital gate

The colony combined the work of a retreat, under the Act of 1879, with that of a reformatory for selected cases. The experience of this colony proved that "committed" cases are usually of a type so much inferior to the "voluntary" cases that it is impossible to maintain efficient control and secure good results when they are mixed. Early in 1903, however, owing to pressure from the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, the managers decided to admit selected cases committed under Section 1 of the Act for drunkenness and consequent neglect of children, the National Society undertaking to make full investigation respecting the moral character and general suitability of proposed cases.[7]

With regard to employment, Duxhurst made a successful attempt at the steady occupation of its inmates. All cleaning and laundry work necessary for the proper conduct of the colony was done by its patients, but in addition to this, some regular industries were provided, to the educational advantage of patients and to the financial advantage of the institution. Much importance was rightly directed to garden work, which occupied many inmates in open air and under glass; they helped in fruit culture and in the subsequent picking and despatch for market; they assisted in the care of bees and in the management of poultry, and they were employed in seed sorting and the like. Dairy work also provided occupation for others. But the most interesting part of the colony was the workroom with its spinning-wheels and hand looms. Here many different forms of textile fabrics were woven with fine finish. Rug-making was a special feature, and all sorts of delicate embroidery and fancy work was made for public sale.[8]

Documenting the work done at Duxhurst, including statistics, anecdotes, and photographs, Lady Henry published Beauty for ashes (London, L. Upcott Gill & Son) in 1913.[9][10] After her death in 1921, the site became repurposed. By the 1960s, all of the buildings were dmolished.

Origin edit

Many years before its inception, the attention of the B.W.T.A. was aroused to the fact of the alarming increase of inebriety among women. At one time in England, alcohol intoxication was punishable by imprisonment only. As it was considered by some to be too severe a penalty, various individuals attempted to remedy this arrangement by urging that drunkenness be prevented instead of punished. It was felt that the system of short penal sentences had the effect of sending inebriate women back to the life they had before. It was realised that they had to combat an issue that was not only moral but also physical, and that therefore, it was necessary to provide physical as well as moral remedies.[11][3]

Profoundly impressed by the methods advocated by Frances Willard, Lady Henry made a special journey to the U.S. with her son, with the object of making her acquaintance. The two women became intimate friends.[12] In 1890, Dr. Mary T. Greene received her medical degree from the University of Michigan.[13] For the next six months, Dr. Greene was an intern in the hospital of Sherborn Reformatory Prison for Women, in South Framingham, Massachusetts. This state institution, the second of its kind to be established in the U.S., was officered entirely by women and accommodated 600. A visit to this prison, on the initiative of Willard, gave Lady Henry the inspiration to found Duxhurst on her estate, a model reformatory for women inebriates in England.[13]

Early history edit

After careful study of the subject, the B.W.T.A., under the leadership of their President, Lady Henry Somerset, lifelong friend of Frances Willard, started in 1895 at Duxhurst, in Surrey, an Industrial Farm Colony for Inebriates, on lines which they believed to be sound and scientific, and which they hoped would make a sort of object lesson for the State. Lady Henry hoped to prove that there was a more reasonable and humane method of treatment. The success of the Colony, which was the first institution of its kind to be opened in England for women, was extremely rapid from the day of its inauguration, and the outcome of the experiment was largely responsible for the passage of the amendment to the Habitual Drunkards Act, which amendment provided for the commitment of alcoholics to private institutions.[3][11]

After the Colony opened, Lady Henry brought Jane Cakebread there to dry out, but Cakebread complained, while at the same time, she wrote letters about living in a beautiful country cottage, where the birds sang, the trees gave a shade, and the breeze blew. Lady Henry found the recidivist alcoholic to be quarrelsome and spiteful and sent her back to London after three months,[14] despite the negative press coverage for her farm colony that Cakebread's ejection produced.[15][16]

In 1897, the village could accommodate fewer than 50 patients. The year before, 3,000 applications for admission were refused.[17] The majority of the patients were not criminals, but alcoholism had desolated their homes.[18] In 1900, it was reported that the colony expenses totaled £4,000 a year.[19]

In 1901, the cost in money of each patient worked out at about nineteen shillings a week—a sum that favourably compares with the cost per head of patients in other institutions of the class in that era. But it was a sum quite beyond the means of the women who come to be helped. From five to twelve shillings a week is what most of the "Villagers" paid. A few obtained slight privileges, and paid as much as fifteen. The rest of the money had to be made up out of the contributions of the public.[20]

Twentieth century edit

Thought Duxhurst Farm Colony operated as an alcohol recovery home for several years, it was not licensed as a retreat until 1901, and, consequently, till that time, was not authorised to receive patients signing under the Act of 1879.[21] In that year, this institution combined the work of a retreat under the Act of 1879 with that of a Reformatory for selected cases under the Act of 1898. Its main object was retreat work, for which it was specially adapted. The Reformatory section was added later, on the assumption that both classes could be received and treated in the same institution and thereby increase its value. When the Reformatory section was first started, it was opened for the reception of cases sent from London Courts under section 2 of the Act, the Managers reserving the right to select or refuse any case which they considered fit or unfit, as the evidence supplied by Courts appeared to indicate. But this means of selection proved futile; it was found that committed cases were of a type so much below what was anticipated, and were so inferior to the voluntary cases admitted as retreat inmates, that their presence interfered with the main work of the institution. The reception of such committals was therefore discontinued, with the result that at the end of 1902, none remained under detention.[8]

Early in 1903, however, owing to pressure from the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), the Managers were induced to start on other lines, and recommence their reformatory work by restricting admissions to cases committed under section 1 of the Act, for drunkenness and consequent neglect of children. The NSPCC undertook to make full enquiry as to the moral character and general suitability of proposed inmates before recommending their admission. This amended scheme worked well, and in its day, was the only instance where selection before admission proved in any way satisfactory. This was accounted for by the fact that the agents of the society had exceptional means of obtaining information concerning the private life and circumstances of individual inmates.[8]

Fifteen inmates were admitted to Duxhurst under these conditions during 1903, and none were discharged. The general circumstances under which they suffered detention were ideal in every respect, their life being made as home-like as possible. But it must be remembered, owing to the exceptional means by which these inmates were selected, that Duxhurst was dealing with the best of reformatory work, and was able to do, with mild measures, what proved impossible in other places where committals were indiscriminate in character.[8]

 
Lady Henry, in nurse uniform (Duxhurst, 1912)

Lady Somserset announced in 1907 that she intended to devote herself almost exclusively to charitable work, and would live mostly at her cottage on Duxhurst Industrial Farm Colony. When staying at Duxhurst, she wore a white cap and nurse's dress and apron, the uniform of the staff.[22]

It was doing very well by then, numbering altogether 130 people, including 27 children from the NSPCC.[23]

In 1915, there was a soldiers' hospital at Duxhurst.[24]

Lady Henry died in 1921.[25] In 1922, it was decided to change the title of the Colony to "Lady Henry Somerset Homes", in memory of the founder.[3] On October 1923, under the name, "Princess Marie Louise Village for Gentlefolk", it became a home for poor women.[25]

By 1926, it was estimated that approximately 70 per cent of the cures were permanent. This figure, however, included all of the cases received, such as the insane, those unfit for active treatment, and those received in a dying condition.[3]

In 1931, the Anglo-Catholic's society of Holy Family Homes incorporated the Lady Henry Somerset Homes to provide housing for children.[26] The site was for sale by auction in 1936. During World War II, it was used as a military training centre as well as a prisoner-of-war camp for Italian prisoners. Thereafter, the structures were demolished in stages, all of them being gone by the 1960s.[25]

Location edit

 
Hospital and some cottages

Duxhurst was located about 30 miles (48 km) from London, and 4 miles (6.4 km) from Lady Henry's home at the Reigate Priory.[27] It was also about 4 miles (6.4 km) from Reigate railway station by road.[17] Constructed as a model industrial farm village, it was a home and reformatory for inebriate women. The site, a farm of 180 acres (73 ha), was situated in a green plateau surrounded by the ridge of the Surrey hills.[28]

The "Village" consisted of home-like cottages grouped round an open quadrangle with a small church adjacent, and, at a short distance, the superintendent's cottage and the chaplain's lodge.[29] The Village contained work rooms, farm buildings, a hospital, a church, and a hall.[17]

Architecture and fittings edit

Cottages edit

There were originally six cottages. By 1900, two more were added, one by the voluntary subscription of sailors ("Royal Navy")), the other by the town of Hastings ("Hastings").[30] Yet another, "Louth", was added by 1910.[31]

Some of the cottages were situated around a central green,[17] forming three sides of a square, with gardens in the centre. Others were scattered over the estate.[32] The cottages were well built and simply furnished. Of English Gothic architectural style, they were one-storeyed with thatched roofs of rush. Each was artistically painted and decorated, inside and out.[33] Each small dwelling was complete in itself, with kitchen, sitting rooms, and bedrooms,[21] as well as a nurses' sitting-bedroom.[33]

The cost of each cottage was approximately £350 (US$1,750), and each structure was named by or after the donor. Various branches of the B.W.T.A contributed funds for the construction of additional cottages.[3] One of the brightest cottages was given by the sailors of the Royal Navy, called the Agnes Weston Royal Navy Cottage.[34]

Lady Henry's cottage edit

 
Lady Henry's cottage
 
Interior, Lady Henry's cottage

Lady Henry's cottage was built by Butler & Paul, cottage house decorators of Norwich, in accordance with Lady Henry's ideas. The cottage was approached by a white wicket gate, opening on to an old-fashioned red-tiled path, lined on either side with bright flower borders. It was one story high, and was thatched with reeds from the Norfolk Broads. The entrance was from a Gothic porch, with seats on either side, and a lantern swinging from the roof. The simple wood door is opened by a latch. Straight away was the chief apartment of the cottage, a long, low room, which extende the full width of the building. The ceiling was white, with beams of oak. The floor was covered with matting, relieved by colored rugs. There were several small diamond-paned windows, with deep window sills, whereon stood pots of musk, fuchsias and geraniums. The curtains were white spotted muslin. A grandfather clock stood in the corner and by the red-brick open fireplace, with andirons, stood the high-backed seat upon which three people could sit. The fireside seat was made out of some pieces of old wood carving which Lady Henry had picked up. The open fireplace was copied from a New England design, which Lady Henry saw at Willard's cottage in the Catskill Mountains. A set of brasses stood about the hearth, and an old brass warming pan hung by the side.[28]

The furniture of the room was very simple. The chairs had rush-bottomed seats and high backs. The sofas and lounges were covered with William Morris's blue art chintz. There was a carved sideboard, in shape something like a kitchen dresser, with crockery shelves above, which Lady Henry brought from Brittany. The old blue china dinner service which stood upon it was purchased in Boston. It was real Chinese ware, and was probably brought to Boston by traders. It was not kept for ornament, and was always used by Lady Henry. Simply framed pictures and portraits hung upon the walls, and one corner was devoted to portraits which were presented to Lady Henry during her tour in the U.S. There hangs Whittier and Holmes, Mary Wilkins, Neal Dow, Abraham Lincoln, Julia Ward Howe, Harriet beecher Stowe, and Frances Willard and her mother. Several of the pictures had autograph inscriptions beneath them, and that of Whittier had a piece of maple from his garden framed in along with it.[28]

When occupying this cottage, Lady Henry always wore a simple dress, with large white apron, and a high white French cap, a kind of nurse's uniform.[28] It was in her sitting-room that the women found the way back to stability. It had a wide window sill always full of pots of growing flowers. Here Lady Henry spent sometimes ten hours a day of hard work, seeing the women one by one.[24]

The principal bedroom was brightly but simply furnished, the prevailing colors being white and pink. White painted wood fitments were fixed in two corners of the room which served to hold her toilet requisites. Further was a maid's bedroom. The remainder of the back portion of the cottage contained kitchen, pantry, servant's bedroom, and visitor's room. The prevailing woodwork of the cottage walls were plain boards, clear varnished in green, a very inexpensive, artistic, and clean style of decoration.[28]

Manor house edit

Far up the road, in its own grounds, was the Manor House, which was opened for the reception of patients able to pay a larger fee.[34] The surplus income derived from the higher fees charged for residence in this part of the retreat went far towards assisting the poorer patients received into the "Village".[21] The gardens beyond the Manor House were managed by a professional woman gardener.[33]

"The Nest" edit

 
The Nest (1912)

Babies were admitted with their mothers, and a holiday home for children on the estate became a source of interest to the initial patients.[17] Hence, in order to care for the children of the residents, one of the buildings was fitted up for them, and was called "The "Nest".[3]

There were women consigned to the Colony by the courts who were convicted of neglect of their children through drunkenness or other misdemeanors and who were sentenced to a detention which sometimes lasted three years. It meant that the child, instead of drifting into the slums, would be cared for during the years that its mother was learning new ways and entering a new life.[32]

In 1920, "The Nest" was completely destroyed by fire, and, as the amount of insurance received was quite inadequate to cover the rebuilding, it was decided to turn the manor house into a new Nest. This reconstructed building remained as a memorial to the founder, Lady Henry Somerset, and to her sister, Adeline Marie Russell, Duchess of Bedford. The house stood in ample grounds, and a public elementary school was within the bounds of the Colony, at which the children, numbering about 50 in 1922, were taught.[3]

Hall edit

There was a large dining and recreation hall, where entertainments and classes were held every evening.[17][21] All meals but tea were taken in the dining room by the nurses and cottage patients.[33] The central hall, built in the same rustic style as the cottages, was named after Willard;[28] a portrait of Willard occupied an honoured place.[12]

Church of St. Mary and the Angels edit

 
Church of St. Mary and the Angels, Duxhurst

Lady Henry relied on the chaplain and the teaching of the church to show the women the way out of fear. The chapel at Duxhurst had been built in the days when her sympathy was with the evangelical school, but the chapel changed its tone and its appearance as she herself had slowly gone back to the preference of her youth for St Paul's Church, Brighton. It was replete with gaily coloured walls, pictures, statues, lamps burning, a side chapel, flowers, candles, incense, beautiful vestments, and a confessional that may have been like no other in England in that era.[24] Services at the chapel were often conducted by Lady Henry herself.[28]

Lady Henry's instinct was right. The women loved the chapel. It was unlike anything they had seen before and had none of the associations bound up in their minds with the Church of England. Hardly at any time of the day was it empty; somewhere within its shelter, a woman would be found kneeling or sitting quietly looking around at everything.[24]

Daily life edit

"We endeavor as far as possible to make every woman who comes to the home take up some occupation in which she has not been engaged before. I lay great stress on this. It breaks off continuity with the past, it gives to the women a new idea, and it absorbs them in occupations which have no associations." (Lady Henry Somerset, 1914)[32]

Each cottage was under the supervision of a young woman who has received special religious and medical training for her work, and the whole were supervised by an able and experienced woman. The women took their meals together, and met daily in the recreation hall where exercises were arranged. They attended temperance and gospel meetings every week. There was one rule: if a woman left the retreat, she was not allowed to come back.[27]

In each cottage, six patients lived together under the charge of a nursing sister. They were carefully selected and grouped together, and lived quietly and naturally, not the ordinary life of an institution. The diet was good and plentiful.[17] The duration of detention in the institution was usually for one year, as it has been proved that permanent cures could not be effected in much less than that time.[3]

There were three classes of patients treated at the Colony:[3] those who come of their own volition and who were able to pay in part for their accommodations; those who are wealthy enough to bear all of their expenses and who were housed in separate cottages; and those habitual inebriates who were committed to the Colony by the order of a magistrate under the provisions of the amendment to the Habitual Drunkards Act.

The patients' daily work was carried on under medical advice in the open air. Flower and fruit raising in the open and under glass, seed growing, poultry and beekeeping, dairy work and fruit preserving, were carried on. The patients were paid for their work.[17]

All of the domestic work done in and around the cottages was handled by the patients. Looms were installed on which fancy aprons, linens, and woolen dress materials could be woven. Approximately 112 cases were handled during the first two years, 55 of which were discharged at the end of that time apparently cured. At the time of the death of Lady Henry Somerset (April, 1921) the Colony had grown considerably, and her project had accomplished remarkable results along the line of influencing the promotion of temperance and women’s work in England.[3]

  •  
    Linen looms
  •  
    Raising chickens
  •  
    Tending the garden
  •  
    Washing clothes
  •  
    Fetching milk
  •  
    Dairy work
  •  
    In the hay field

References edit

  1. ^ Russell, George William Erskine (1910). Sketches and Snapshots. Smith, Elder & Company. p. 286. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  2. ^ Aslet, Clive (4 October 2010). Villages of Britain: The Five Hundred Villages that Made the Countryside. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-7475-8872-6. Retrieved 25 August 2022.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Cherrington, Ernest Hurst (1926). Standard Encyclopedia of the Alcohol Problem. Vol. 3. American Issue Publishing Company. p. 872. Retrieved 20 August 2022 – via Internet Archive.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  4. ^ "Titled ladies in socialist movement". Evening Star. 17 February 1907. p. 53. Retrieved 21 August 2022 – via Newspapers.com.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  5. ^ Valverde, Mariana (28 October 1998). Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-64469-3. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  6. ^ Gray, F. (13 March 2012). Women in Journalism at the Fin de Siècle: Making a Name for Herself. Springer. ISBN 978-1-137-00130-6. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  7. ^ "Duxhurst Industrial Farm Colony, Reigate, Surrey". The British Journal of Inebriety (Alcoholism and Drug Addiction). 1. Ballière, Tindall and Cox: 119. 1905. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  8. ^ a b c d Great Britain Parliament House of Commons (1905). "Duxhurst Industrial Farm Colony, Reigate, Surrey". Parliamentary Papers. H.M. Stationery Office. p. 10. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  9. ^ Somerset, Lady Henry (1913). Beauty for Ashes by Lady ...: Preface by Rco. E.F. Russell. L. Upcott Gill & Son. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  10. ^ The Publishers' Circular and Booksellers' Record. Publishers' circular. 22 November 1913. p. 667. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  11. ^ a b Charity Organisation Society (1900). The Charity Organisation Review. Vol. 8. London: Longmans, Green and Company. p. 167. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  12. ^ a b "WOMEN WORKERS. LADY HENRY SOMERSET". Every Woman's Encyclopaedia. Vol. 8. London. 1912. pp. 5458–62. Retrieved 21 August 2022.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  13. ^ a b Gordon, Elizabeth Putnam (1925). The Story of the Life and Work of Cordelia A. Greene, M.D. The Castilian. pp. 150–51. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  14. ^ "'JANE CAKEBREAD AGAIN.' A HEADING WHICH DISAPPEARS FROM LONDON PAPERS - DEATH OF THE WORLD'S 'AWFUL EXAMPLE'" (PDF). The London Telegraph. 19 December 1898. Retrieved 28 February 2022 – via The New York Times.
  15. ^ "Somerset [née Somers-Cocks], Lady Isabella Caroline [Lady Henry Somerset]". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/36188. Retrieved 2 March 2022. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  16. ^ "SOME ASPECTS OF INEBRITY". Saint Paul Medical Journal. XI (2). St. Paul, Minnesota: Ramsey County Medical Society: 112. February 1909. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h "DUXHURST FARM COLONY FOR INEBRIATES". British Medical Journal. 1. British Medical Association: 483. 1897. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  18. ^ Walters, A. R. (1905). "DUXHURST FARM COLONY, REIGATE.". In Great Britain Parliament House of Commons (ed.). Sessional papers. Inventory control record 1. Vol. 11. p. 131. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  19. ^ "An Experiment with Women Inebriates". The Princeton Union. Princeton, Minnesota. 29 November 1900. p. 3. Retrieved 21 August 2022 – via Newspapers.com.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  20. ^ Carter, J.; Prichard, H. A.; Rashdall, H., eds. (1901). "The Duxhurst Industrial Farm Colony. By E. A. Barnett". The Economic Review. Vol. 11. London: Rivingtons. pp. 349–52. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  21. ^ a b c d "RETREATS. REPORT CONCERNING RETREAS ESTABLISHED UNDER THE INEBRIATES ACTS, 1879 TO 1900, FOR THE YEAR 1901.". The Report of the Inspector Under the Inebriates Acts. 1897. pp. 18–19. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  22. ^ Tooley, Sarah A. (1902). "LADY HENRY SOMERSET AT DUXHURST. Restoring Woman's Ideal". Methodist Magazine and Review. Vol. 55. W. Briggs. p. 206. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  23. ^ "Lady Henry Somerset. Last Appearance in public". Citizen. Gloucestershire. 3 May 1907. p. 4. Retrieved 21 August 2022 – via Newspapers.com.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  24. ^ a b c d Fitzpatrick, Kathleen (1923). Lady Henry Somerset. Little, Brown. pp. 211–17. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  25. ^ a b c "The Duxhurst Colony for Inebriate Women". redhill-reigate-history.co.uk. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  26. ^ The Living Church Annual. Morehouse-Gorham Company. 1931. Retrieved 21 August 2022.
  27. ^ a b World's Woman's Christian Temperance Union Convention (1897). "Homes for Inebriates". Report of the ... Biennial Convention and Minutes of the Executive Committee Meetings of the World's Woman's Christian Temperance Union. Vol. 4–6. White Ribbon Company. p. 19. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  28. ^ a b c d e f g Tooley, Sarah A. (November 1898). "The cottage Homes of Lady Henry Somerset". House Beautiful. Vol. IV, no. 6. Chicago: Hearst Corporation. pp. 195–200. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  29. ^ Whitaker, Joseph (1911). "The Industrial Fram Village, Duxhurst, Reigate.". An Almanack... London: Whitaker's Almanack. p. 690. Retrieved 21 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  30. ^ "FOR WOMEN WHO DRINK". Quad-City Times. 18 November 1900. p. 9. Retrieved 21 August 2022 – via Newspapers.com.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  31. ^ "DUXHURST FARM COLONY". The Surrey Mirror and County Post. 8 July 1910. p. 3. Retrieved 21 August 2022 – via Newspapers.com.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  32. ^ a b c Somerset, Lady Henry (7 June 1914). "RECLAIMING WOMEN VICTIMS OF ALCOHOL AND DRUGS". The Sun. p. 36. Retrieved 21 August 2022 – via Newspapers.com.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  33. ^ a b c d Woman's Work in the Far East. 1895. pp. 84–85. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
  34. ^ a b Stewart, Jane A. (4 April 1907). "The Duxhurst Inebriate Farm Colony". Christian Register. 86: 377–78. Retrieved 20 August 2022.   This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.

Further reading edit

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Duxhurst_Industrial_Farm_Colony&oldid=1198476805"