The Dreyse needle-gun was a 19th-century military breech-loading rifle, as well as the first breech-loading rifle to use a bolt action to open and close the chamber. It was used as the main infantry weapon of the Prussians in the Wars of German Unification. It was invented in 1836 by the German gunsmith Johann Nikolaus von Dreyse (1787–1867), who had been conducting numerous design experiments since 1824.

Dreyse needle-gun
M-1841 Dreyse needle-gun
TypeBolt-action rifle
Place of originKingdom of Prussia
Service history
In service1841–1876 (Kingdom of Prussia and German Empire)
Used by
Production history
DesignerJohann Nikolaus von Dreyse
DesignedFrom 1824
No. built1,375,000+[5]
  • Zündnadelgewehr M/41[6]
  • Zündnadelbüchse M/49[6]
  • Zündnadelbüchse (Pikenbüchse) M/54[6]
  • Zündnadelkarabiner M/55 and M/57[6]
  • Füsiliergewehr M/60[6]
  • Zündnadelgewehr M/62[6]
  • Zündnadelbüchse M/65[6]
  • Zündnadelpioniergewehr U/M (modified model)[6]
  • Zündnadelpioniergewehr M/69[6]
  • 4.9 kg (10.8 lb) Zündnadelgewehr M/41
  • 4.8 kg (10.6 lb) Zündnadelgewehr M/62
  • 143 cm (56 in) Zündnadelgewehr M/41
  • 134 cm (52.8 in) Zündnadelgewehr M/62
Barrel length91 cm (36 in)

CartridgeAcorn-shaped lead bullet in paper cartridge
Caliber15.4 mm (0.61 in)
ActionBreech-loading bolt action
Rate of fire4–5 rounds per minute[7]
Muzzle velocity305 m/s (1,000 ft/s) (before Aptierung), 350m/s (aptiert)
Effective firing range200 m (218.7 yd) (point target)
Maximum firing range
  • 527 m (576.3 yd) (maximum setting on sights for M/62)
  • 678 m (741.5 yd) (maximum setting on sights for M/65)
Feed systemSingle-shot
SightsV-notch and front post iron sights

The name "ignition needle rifle" (German: Zündnadelgewehr) was based on its firing pin, since it passed like a needle through the paper cartridge to strike a percussion cap at the base of the bullet. However, to conceal the revolutionary nature of the design, the rifle entered military service in 1841 as the leichtes Perkussionsgewehr Modell 1841 (transl. Light Percussion Rifle Model 1841).[citation needed] It had a rate of fire of about six rounds per minute.

History edit

The first types of needle gun made by Johann Nikolaus von Dreyse were muzzle-loading, with a firing pin consisting of a long needle driven by a coiled conchoidal spring that fired the internal percussion cap on the base of the sabot. His adoption of the bolt-action breech-loading principle combined with this igniter system gave the rifle its military potential, as these factors allowed a much faster rate of fire.

After successful testing in 1840, the Prussian king Friedrich Wilhelm IV ordered 60,000 of the new rifles. Dreyse set up the Dreyse-Zündnadel factory in Sömmerda with the help of state loans to ramp up production. It was accepted for service in 1841 as the leichtes Perkussionsgewehr Model 1841, but only 45,000 units had been produced by 1848. It was used in combat for the first time during the German revolutions of 1848–49 and proved its combat superiority in street fighting during the May Uprising in Dresden in 1849. Many German states subsequently adopted the weapon. The Sömmerda factory could not meet demand and produced only 30,000 rifles a year. Most of the Prussian infantry in the 1850s were still equipped with the obsolete 1839 Model Potsdam musket, a smoothbore weapon whose range and accuracy was far inferior to the French Minié and Austrian Lorenz rifle.[8] The Prussian Army's low level of funding resulted in just 90 battalions being equipped with the weapon in 1855.[9] Dreyse consented to state manufacture of the rifle to increase production. The Royal Prussian Rifle Factory at the Spandau Arsenal began production in 1853, followed by Danzig, Saarn [de] and Erfurt. At first, the Spandau factory produced 12,000 Dreyse needle guns a year, rising to 48,000 in 1867.

The British Army evaluated the Dreyse needle gun in 1849–1851. In the British trials, the Dreyse was shown to be capable of six rounds per minute, and to maintain accuracy at 800–1,200 yards (730–1,100 m).[10] The trials suggested that the Dreyse was "too complicated and delicate" for service use. The French carabine à tige muzzle-loading rifle was judged to be a better weapon, and an improved version was adopted as the Pattern 1851 Minié-type muzzle-loading rifle.[10]

After the Prussian army received a 25% increase in funding and was reformed by Wilhelm I, Albrecht von Roon and Helmuth von Moltke the Elder from 1859 to 1863, the Dreyse needle gun played an important role in the Austro-Prussian victory in the Second Schleswig War against Denmark in 1864. The introduction of cast steel barrels made industrial mass production of the weapon possible in the early 1860s.[8] The new 1862 model and the enhanced M/55 ammunition type expedited the use and widespread adoption of the weapon in the 1860s.[8] The success of German private industry in delivering the necessary amount of armaments for the army marked the definite end of government-owned army workshops.[8] The Prussian Army infantry had 270,000 Dreyse needle guns by the outbreak of the Austro-Prussian War in 1866.[8] The employment of the needle-gun changed military tactics in the 19th century, as a Prussian soldier could fire five (or more) shots, even while lying on the ground, in the time that it took his Austrian muzzle-loading counterpart to reload while standing. Production was ramped up after the war against Austria and when the Franco-Prussian War broke out in 1870, the Prussian Army had 1,150,000 needle guns in its inventory.

In 1867, Romania purchased 20,000 rifles and 11,000 carbines from the Prussian government. These were used to great effect in the Romanian War of Independence.

Sometime in the late 1860s, Japan acquired an unknown number of Model 1862 rifles and bayonets. These were marked with the imperial chrysanthemum stamp. China also acquired Dreyse rifles for the modernisation of their armed forces.

Chinese Hunan Army with Dreyse needle gun

Ammunition and mechanism edit

Dreyse mechanism, model 1862.

The cartridge used with this rifle consisted of the paper case, the bullet, the percussion cap and the black powder charge. The 15.4 mm (0.61 in) bullet was shaped like an acorn, with the broader end forming a point and the primer attached to its base. The bullet was held in a paper case known as a sabot, which separated from the bullet as it exited the muzzle. Between this inner lining and the outer case was the powder charge, consisting of 4.8 g (74 grains) of black powder.[11]

The upper end of the paper case is rolled up and tied. Upon release of the trigger, the point of the needle pierces the rear of the cartridge, passes through the powder and hits the primer fixed to the base of the sabot. Thus the burn-front in the black powder charge passes from the front to the rear. This front-to-rear burn pattern minimizes the effect seen in rear-igniting cartridges where a portion of the powder at the front of the charge is wasted, as it is forced down and out of the barrel and burns in the air as muzzle flash. It also ensures that the whole charge burns under the highest possible pressure, theoretically minimising unburnt residues. Consequently, a smaller charge can be used to obtain the same velocity as a rear-ignited charge of the same bullet calibre and weight. It also increases the handling security of the cartridge, since it is virtually impossible to set the primer off accidentally.

There was also a blank cartridge developed for the needle gun. It was shorter and lighter than the live round, since it lacked the projectile, but was otherwise similar in construction and powder load.

Limitations edit

British trials in 1849–1851 showed that:[10]

  • The spring that drove the needle was delicate.
  • When the needle was dirty, the rifle tended to misfire. Colonel Hawker considered that a new needle was required every 12 shots.
  • When the gun was heated and foul, operating the bolt required much strength.
  • The barrel tended to wear at the junction with the cylinder.
  • The escape of gas at the breech got worse as firing continued.

Its effective range was less than that of the Chassepot, against which it was fielded during the Franco-Prussian War.[12] This was mainly because a sizable amount of gas escaped at the breech when the rifle was fired with a paper cartridge. An improved model, giving greater muzzle velocity and increased speed in loading, was introduced later, but it was replaced shortly thereafter by the Mauser Model 1871 rifle.

The placement of the primer directly behind the bullet meant the firing needle was enclosed in black powder when the gun was fired, causing stress to the pin, which could break over time and render the rifle useless until it could be replaced. Soldiers were provided with two replacement needles for that purpose. The needle could be easily replaced in under 30 seconds, even in the field. Because the rifle used black powder, residue accumulated at the back of the barrel, making cleaning necessary after about 60–80 shots. This was not a large problem because the individual soldier carried fewer cartridges than that and Dreyse created an "air chamber" by having a protruding needle tube. (The Chassepot also had this, but it was more likely to jam after fewer shots because its chamber had a smaller diameter.) A soldier trained before the Austro-Prussian War of 1866 had to finish field cleaning in less than 10 minutes.

Comparison with contemporary rifles edit

Rifle Dreyse Kammerlader M1849/55 Pattern 1851 Minié rifle Fusil modèle 1866 Chassepot rifle
Effective range 600 m (660 yd) 1,000 m (1,100 yd) 1,460 m (1,600 yd)[13] 1,200 m (1,300 yd) [14]
Sighted to 600 m (660 yd)[15] 1,600 m (1,750 yd)[15]
Rate of fire 6 rounds/minute[10] 6 to 8 rounds/minute (estimate, see article) 2 rounds/minute[13] 5 rounds/minute[16]
6 to 7 rounds/minute[14]
Calibre 15.4 mm (0.61 in) 17.5 mm (0.69 in) 17.8 mm (.702 in) 11 mm (0.43 in)[15]
Muzzle velocity 305 m/s (1,000 ft/s) 265–350 m/s (870–1,150 ft/s)
Barrel length 91 cm (35.8 in) 78 cm (30.7 in) 99.1 cm (39 in)[15]
Total length 142 cm (55.9 in) 126 cm (49.6 in)
Loaded weight 4.7 kg (10.4 lb) 5 kg (11.0 lb)

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b Ryozen Museum of History exhibit
  2. ^ "Frederick Townsend Ward and the Ever— Victorious Army". 6 August 2021.
  3. ^ D'Albéca, Alexandre. La France au Dahomey. p.218.
  4. ^ Jowett, Phillip (2016). Imperial Chinese Armies 1840–1911.
  5. ^ Finze, Wolfgang (22 January 2016). Preußische Zündnadelgewehre In Deutschland 1861–1871 und die Aptierung nach Beck. BoD – Books on Demand. ISBN 9783739201085.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i Eckhardt, Werner; Morawietz, Otto (1957). Die Handwaffen des brandenburgisch-preußisch-deutschen Heeres 1640–1945. pp. 118–126.
  7. ^ Finze, Wolfgang (22 January 2016). Preußische Zündnadelgewehre In Deutschland 1861-1871 und die Aptierung nach Beck (in German). BoD – Books on Demand. ISBN 9783739201085.
  8. ^ a b c d e Förster & Nagler 1997, pp. 269.
  9. ^ Förster & Nagler 1997, pp. 268.
  10. ^ a b c d Strachan, Hew (1985). From Waterloo to Balaclava: tactics, technology, and the British Army 1815–1854. Cambridge University Press. pp. 38–40. ISBN 0521304393.
  11. ^ Flatnes, Oyvind. From Musket to Metallic Cartridge: A Practical History of Black Powder Firearms. Crowood Press, 2013, pp. 125–130. ISBN 978-1847975935
  12. ^ capandball (17 June 2016). Tactics and Rifles of the Battle of Königgrätz – Lorenz and Dreyse Rifles in Action. YouTube. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2016.
  13. ^ a b Strachan, Hew, From Waterloo to Balaclava, p. 41
  14. ^ a b Léonce, Patry (2001), The Reality of War, a memory of the Franco-Prussian War 1870–1871, translated by Fermer, Douglas, Cassell & Co, p. 27, ISBN 030435913-0
  15. ^ a b c d Flatnes, Oyvind (2013), From Musket to Metallic Cartridge: A Practical History of Black Powder Firearms, Crowood, ISBN 978-1-84797-594-2
  16. ^ Ascoli, David (1987), A Day of Battle, Mars-La-Tours 16 August 1870, Harrap, p. 279, ISBN 0245542507

  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Needle-Gun". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Bibliography edit

  • Förster, Stig; Nagler, Jörg (1997). On the Road to Total War: The American Civil War and the German Wars of Unification, 1861–1871. Cambridge: German Historical Institute. ISBN 0-521-56071-3.

Further reading edit

  • A-R-West, Leonard & Guy (2019). The Dreyse MILITARY NEEDLE-IGNITION SYSTEM, an illustrated history (First ed.). West Sussex, England: Woodfield Publishing Ltd. ISBN 978-1-84683-190-4.
  • Rolf Wirtgen (Ed.) Das Zündnadelgewehr - Eine militärtechnische Revolution im 19.Jhd., Herford 1991 (In-depth German monograph on Dreyse and the development of his weapon in historical context)
  • John Walter (2006). Rifles of the World. Krause Publications. pp. 102–106. ISBN 978-0-89689-241-5.[permanent dead link]
  • Oyvind Flatnes (2013). From Musket to Metallic Cartridge: A Practical History of Black Powder Firearms. Crowood Press. pp. 125–130. ISBN 978-1847975935.

External links edit