| Submission rejected on 13 April 2024 by Mcmatter (talk). This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by Mcmatter 26 days ago. Last edited by Mcmatter 26 days ago. |  |
| "The Battle of Small Penises" | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
| Belligerents | |||||
| "The Cool People" | "The Canadian" | ||||
| Units involved | |||||
| Tardcast | Brock | ||||
| Strength | |||||
| 5 American Shitposters (Sean, Chad, ratiowhale, Razi, and KingFish) | 1 Canadian (Brock) | ||||
The Battle of Tardcast was a significant online confrontation that unfolded on Twitter, specifically within a Twitter Space called "Tardcast," between two individuals, "@Sharland57753" (real name Sean) and "@Brock03449978" (real name Brock). This event, which took place on April 12, 2024, around 10:20 PM EST, centered around a dispute over who should be excluded from a popular group chat known as the "Cool" groupchat. The battle not only drew substantial attention due to its dramatic nature but also because it showcased starkly contrasting approaches to digital community management.
Background The "Cool" groupchat, a private digital space for friends with common interests, saw its harmony disrupted by diverging opinions on membership policy. Sean, a founding member, and his supporters valued the exclusivity and intimate nature of the group, which they felt fostered deeper connections among members. Brock, a newer member from Canada, pushed for a more inclusive approach, advocating for expanding the group's membership which led to the conflict. Prelude to the Battle The disagreement over the groupchat's direction had been brewing for some time. Brock's proposal to open up the group was met with resistance from Sean and his cohort, who were concerned about preserving the group's core ethos. This led to increased tensions, culminating in the decision to resolve the dispute publicly in the "Tardcast" Twitter Space. The Battle The Battle of Tardcast featured a one-sided affair in terms of support. On Sean's side were his allies from the "Cool" groupchat, including Chad, ratiowhale, Razi, and KingFish, all prominent members who echoed Sean’s sentiment for maintaining exclusivity. Brock stood alone, arguing his case without direct support, relying on emotional and dramatic appeals to make his case for inclusivity.
The battle was characterized by:
- Sean's Logical Arguments: Sean presented structured, logical reasons for keeping the group exclusive, which resonated with many listeners in the Tardcast and aligned with the views of his allies. - Brock's Emotional Pleas: Brock's arguments, while heartfelt, often lacked the logical foundation necessary to sway the broader audience, which led to his isolation.
Ceasefire and Aftermath The conflict concluded on the same night with a ceasefire mediated by other members and moderators of the groupchat. The immediate consequence for Brock was a 3-day suspension from the "Cool" groupchat for causing significant discord and failing to adhere to the group's established communication norms.
Sean emerged as the victor, not only maintaining his leadership within the group but also reinforcing the values that many members cherished. Brock's temporary removal served as a period for the group to stabilize and reflect on its governance policies.
Legacy The Battle of Tardcast remains a key reference point in discussions about online community management, conflict resolution, and the power dynamics within digital spaces. It illustrates the impact of having a strong support network and the difficulties of advocating for change as an outsider within established groups. The event also highlights the role of digital platforms in facilitating public discourse and resolving community disputes.