| Submission declined on 22 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 22 April 2024 by CanonNi (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 12 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
| Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
| |
Comment: Since the previous decline, only one new sources has been added, which is an interview of the CEO, and therefore not independent (and possibly also not reliable, depending on whether the publication applies error-checking / editorial oversight to their interviews, and if so of what quality). Given the number of past declines, I should probably be rejecting this now, but let's give it one more chance. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:59, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Removing primary sources is not enough. Please add independent and reliable sources.
'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''(talk|contribs) 13:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Primary sources and routine business reporting do not establish notability per WP:NCORP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: re-submitting with zero improvement is disruptive and likely to lead to a rejection. Theroadislong (talk) 13:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 | This article contains paid contributions. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. |
Serenata Flowers edit
Overview edit
Serenata Flowers is an online retailer and e-commerce platform specialising in flowers and gifts, operating in the United Kingdom. Serenata Flowers started in 2003 in London and was one of the first online floristry businesses[1] to operate in the United Kingdom.
Background edit
Serenata Flowers started in 2003 as two small flower shops in London but pivoted the business to an online website in 2004[2], where customers could order bouquets for next-day delivery. The switch in business to a direct-to-consumer business model coincided with the growth of e-commerce platforms in the early 2000s.[3]
Serenata Flowers is one of several established players in the online floral industry[4], and is one of the most reviewed floral retailers in the United Kingdom[5]
Products edit
Serenata Flowers was one of the first flower delivery services in the UK to offer ‘letterbox flowers’, where a bouquet is delivered directly through the letterbox of the recipient. Serenata Flowers also offers customers a wide range of products and delivery services, including a subscription service.[6]
References edit
- ^ "Serenata Flowers launch new brand identity to mark twenty years in the gifting industry". February 7, 2024. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- ^ "INTERVIEW | Martin Johansson: Business is blooming". BusinessToday.com.mt. Retrieved 2024-04-22.
- ^ "SERENATA FLOWERS UNVEILS REBRAND". Packaging Today. 2020-10-02. Retrieved March 10, 2024.
- ^ "Is Malta's e-commerce industry about to blossom?". Times of Malta. 2018-08-19. Retrieved 2024-04-10.
- ^ "SerenataFlowers.com is rated "Great" with 4.1 / 5 on Trustpilot". Trustpilot. 2024-04-09. Retrieved 2024-04-10.
- ^ Skeldon, Paul (2020-04-06). "Indie florist Serenata Flowers launches subscription service". InternetRetailing. Retrieved 2024-04-10.