Draft:Seen examination

Submission declined on 11 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by SafariScribe 16 days ago. Last edited by Citation bot 15 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Seen examinations

Is a type of assessment method are where questions are given out at a pre-specified date beforehand. The advantage is that students focus on preparation for the answer rather than second-guessing what questions will be set. Anxiety is reduced and standards are likely to rise because students can use it as a learning experience. However, plagiarism can be an issue.^[1]

Benefits of Seen Examinations

Reduced Anxiety and Improved Preparation

Seen examinations are designed to reduce student anxiety by allowing more thorough preparation. A study by Joseph K. Wireko (2015)^[2] at Ghana Technology University College found that students felt more confident and less stressed when preparing for seen exams compared to traditional unseen exams. This reduction in anxiety led to better performance and a more positive learning experience (Wireko, 2015).^[3]

References

https://oqsp.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk/traditional-timed-unseen-seen-exam/#:~:text=Seen%20examinations%20are%20where%20questions,it%20as%20a%20learning%20experience

^ "Traditional Timed 'Unseen'/'Seen' Exam". 17 May 2019.
^ Wireko, J. K. (2015). Does seen examination promote “deep” or “surface” learning? Pedagogical reflections on using seen examinations for student learning feedback. The Business and Management Review, 6(5), 60-67.
^ Wireko, J. K. (2015). Does seen examination promote “deep” or “surface” learning? Pedagogical reflections on using seen examinations for student learning feedback. The Business and Management Review, 6(5), 60-67.

[1] "Traditional Timed 'Unseen'/'Seen' Exam". 17 May 2019.

[2] Wireko, J. K. (2015). Does seen examination promote “deep” or “surface” learning? Pedagogical reflections on using seen examinations for student learning feedback. The Business and Management Review, 6(5), 60-67.

[3] Wireko, J. K. (2015). Does seen examination promote “deep” or “surface” learning? Pedagogical reflections on using seen examinations for student learning feedback. The Business and Management Review, 6(5), 60-67.

[1]

[2]

[3]