| Submission declined on 21 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 21 July 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 20 minutes ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 July 2024 by Grabup (talk). We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer. Declined by Grabup 60 minutes ago. | |
Mike Yearworth
editMike Yearworth (born 1961) is a British academic working in the area of Problem Structuring Methods.
Career
editMike Yearworth is Emeritus Professor of Management Science at the University of Exeter Business School and Co-Editor-in-Chief of the European Journal of Operational Research.
References
editYearworth, M. (2024). Problem Structuring: Methodology in Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9781119744825.
Ormerod, R. J.; Yearworth, M.; White, L. (2023). "Understanding participant actions in OR interventions using practice theories: a research agenda". European Journal of Operational Research. 306 (2): 810–827. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.030.
Yearworth, M.; White, L. (2014). "The non-codified use of problem structuring methods and the need for a generic constitutive definition". European Journal of Operational Research. 237 (3): 932–945. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.015.
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Academics | |
