| Submission declined on 10 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: Could be notable under WP:ANYBIO, but there are no citations in the article backing the claim that she has won anything. GNG is not established because all the sources, except for one, are either trivial namedrops or primary. C F A 💬 03:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will require disambiguation if accepted.If this draft is accepted, a hatnote will need to be added to the primary page to refer to this page. If there is already a hatnote on the primary page, please review whether a disambiguation page is in order instead.The primary page is Jennifer Strong. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
 | An editor has marked this as a promising draft and requests that, should it go unedited for six months, G13 deletion be postponed, either by making a dummy/minor edit to the page, or by improving and submitting it for review. Last edited by CFA (talk | contribs) 4 months ago. (Update) |  |
 | This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Last edited by CFA (talk | contribs) 4 months ago. (Update)
Finished drafting? or |
Jennifer Strong (born April 29, 1978 in New York City) is an American Journalist and media producer[1] known for her prolific catalogue of science and technology programs aired on ProPublica,[2] The Wall Street Journal,[3] MIT Technology Review,[4] and National Public Radio's PRX network.[5][6] Her work has been recognized more than thirty times, including six Webby, and three Ambie nominations. Her production work were voted finalist selections at the New York Festivals two years in a row, and chosen as a finalist for The Drum Awards in London for a taping she did inside an experimental fighter plane.
Strong earned a M.A. in Journalism: International Affairs, American University, Washington, DC, a B.A. in Communication from Gardner-Webb University, Boiling Springs, NC.
Awards
edit- 2023 Editor & Publisher Award, In Machines We Trust won the Eppy for “Best Podcast” for enterprise reporting on AI and hiring.
- 2023 Podcast of the Year Finalist, In Machines We Trust from the Drum Awards for Online Media.
- 2023 Signal Awards, In Machines We Trust is a finalist for “Best Science and Education” podcast.
- 2023 Webby Nominee, In Machines We Trust was a finalist for the Webby for “Best Tech Podcast Episode” and Curious Coincidence was up for “Best Limited Series” in the Health, Science and Education category.
- 2023 New York Festivals Finalist, In Machines We Trust was named a podcast finalist at the New York Festivals.
- 2023 Publisher Podcast Awards Nominee, Curious Coincidence is a finalist for “Best Limited Series” and “Best Science and Medicine Podcast” and In Machines We Trust was named a finalist for “Best Tech” podcast for the third year in a row.
- 2023 Ambie Nominee, In Machines We Trust was nominated by The Podcast Academy for an Ambie, the podcast industry's academy award for excellence in audio, for the second time as a finalist in the “Best Knowledge, Science, or Tech Podcast” category.
References
edit- ^ Dibdin, Emma (2023-06-03). "6 Podcasts to Make Sense of A.I." The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ ProPublica (2021-12-20). "The Extortion Economy Podcast: Exploring the Secret World of Ransomware". ProPublica. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Jennifer Strong — Former host, The Future of Everything at The Wall Street Journal". WSJ. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Articles by Jennifer Strong | MIT Technology Review". www.technologyreview.com. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Steward, Laura (2021-09-06). "Strong Versus The Machine: Guess Who Wins". Podcast Magazine®. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ Panel®, Expert. "Council Post: 16 Tech Experts Share Their Favorite Tech-Focused Podcasts". Forbes. Retrieved 2024-01-05.