| Submission declined on 15 June 2024 by Justlettersandnumbers (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 15 June 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 13 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 15 June 2024 by Spiderone (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Spiderone 13 days ago. | |
Comment: The page has no independent reliable sources whatsoever, and thus no indication whatsoever of notability as understood in this project. The draft has already been declined twice for this reason, please do not submit it again without first remedying this oversight. You can read about our (rather strict) minimum inclusion requirements for companies and organisations here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
The International Society of Electrocardiology (ISE) [1] has been formally established in 1993 [2], but started as a scientic council in the late Fifties. The International Society for Electrocardiology (ISE) is a global organization dedicated to the study and advancement of electrocardiology, which focuses on the electrical activity of the heart. It brings together researchers, healthcare professionals, and experts in the field to exchange knowledge, collaborate on research, and promote best practices in electrocardiology.. Nowadays, ISE has approximately 200 international members, all clinical or research scientists including medical doctors or biomedical engineers from almost all countries in the world.
ISE recognizes as its official scientific journal the Journal of Electrocardiology, published by Elsevier [3], indexed on Scopus[4] with an impact factor of 1.3[5].
Scientific role
editISE organizes yearly international conferences[6] gathering researchers from across the world. But the most prominent rsponsibility is that of issueing scientific consensus on key features of electrocardiography[7]
References
edit- ^ "ISE". ISE. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- ^ "ISE Constitution". ISE. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- ^ "JECG". IECG. Retrieved 15 June 2024.
- ^ Scopus https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/23855#tabs=0. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ "Journal of Electrocardiology". Science Direct. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
- ^ "ISE Conferences". Retrieved 26 June 2024.
- ^ Bacharova, Ljuba (18 August 2023). "ISE/ISHNE Expert Consensus Statement on ECG Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Change of the Paradigm. The joint paper of the International Society of Electrocardiology and the International Society for Holter Monitoring and Noninvasive Electrocardiology". J Electrocrdiol. 2023 (Nov–Dec): 85–93. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.08.005. PMID 37647776. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.