Submission declined on 16 July 2024 by Iwaqarhashmi (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 28 May 2024 by Rkieferbaum (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Rkieferbaum 5 months ago. |
Submission declined on 28 April 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 6 months ago. |
Submission declined on 25 April 2024 by Mach61 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Mach61 6 months ago. |
Submission declined on 15 April 2024 by Hey man im josh (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Hey man im josh 6 months ago. |
Submission declined on 14 April 2024 by Ibjaja055 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Ibjaja055 6 months ago. |
- Comment: THe only change since last submission was the inclusion of an unreferenced sentence. Rkieferbaum (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Hareton Salvanini | |
---|---|
[[File:[Maestro Hareton Salvanini 1973.webp|frameless|upright=1|Maestro Hareton Salvanini 1973]] | |
Background information | |
Born | José Hareton Salvanini Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil | September 25, 1942
Genres | |
Occupations |
|
Instrument | Piano |
Years active | 1944–2006 |
Hareton Salvanini (September 25, 1942 – 2006) was a Brazilian jazz composer and arranger.[1]
Legacy
editSalvanini's album S.P. 73 would be awarded "Best Foreign Album" by Japanese Jazz Journal. Many of Salvanini's compositions, including Cuarto de Hotel and Só are sampled and played extensively by the online community.
Discography
edit- Hareton + Meta (1971)
- S.P. 73 (1973)
- A Virgem De Saint Tropez (1974)
- Hareton Salvanini (1977)
- Xavana Uma Ilha Do Amor (1981)
- Saudades De Caminhoneiro (1989)
References
edit- ^ Buttle, David. "Hareton Salvanini". Mr Bongo. Retrieved April 14, 2024.
- Kriss, Elba (May 11, 2021). "Globo is Sued for Using Music by a Dead Maestro in the Brazilian Championship". Notícias da TV.