| Submission declined on 17 October 2023 by Phuzion (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 29 June 2023 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. | |
David Holz is the founder of Leap Motion, an executive at Midjourney, and a former NASA researcher.[1].
Initially, Holz pursued his academic interests as a student researcher at the Max Planck Institute from 2009 to 2010. He then enrolled as a PhD student in Applied Mathematics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where he received a Research Assistant Scholarship. However, David took a leave of absence to co-found Leap Motion.
At Leap Motion, Holz raised over $94M[2] in venture capital from investors such as Andreessen Horowitz, Founders Fund, and JP Morgan.
Holz was honored as one of Forbes' 30 Under 30 - Consumer Technology[3] and recognized as one of Fast Company's Most Creative People[4]
References edit
- ^ ""An engine for the imagination": An interview with David Holz, CEO of AI image generator Midjourney". 2 August 2022.
- ^ https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/leap-motion/company_financials
- ^ "David Holz". Forbes.
- ^ https://www.fastcompany.com/3025456/most-creative-people-in-business-1000-the-complete-list