| Submission declined on 14 January 2024 by Mach61 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Evolver (311 album). Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 12 December 2023 by Ca (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. | |
| Submission declined on 18 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. | |
Comment: There is a lack of quality coverage about the song. This review is written by an AI.Anyone can submit interviews here, made up or not, making it prone to manipulation.The AllMusic review is good though. Try finding more like it.Good luck! Ca talk to me! 12:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
| "Creatures (For a While)" | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single by 311 | ||||
| from the album Evolver | ||||
| Released | July 2003[1] | |||
| Recorded | January–April 2003 | |||
| Studio | The Hive | |||
| Genre | Rock | |||
| Length |
| |||
| Label | Volcano Entertainment | |||
| Producer(s) | ||||
| 311 singles chronology | ||||
| ||||
| Music video | ||||
| "Creatures (For a While)" on YouTube | ||||
"Creatures (For a While)" is a song by the American rock band 311 from their 2003 album Evolver. The song is the most streamed song on the album on Spotify.[2]
Origin edit
Nick Hexum got the idea for the song when he saw a poster advertising a punk rock concert that said, "A few drinks, a few smokes, and then... creatures for a while."[3] Nick Hexum also had surgery for tonsillitis in between From Chaos and Evolver.
Background edit
The song had started out with a guitar riff that Hexum had played into a mini recorder he had owned. He asked Tim Mahoney to write a second part, so he gave him a Pro Tools file to see what he was working on. He sent back a funky, bouncy riff that was the bass line. He used the same effects that he used on Champagne. Hexum then proceeded to finish the song during a seven-hour session in his home studio. Martinez wrote some raps that fit with the lyrics of the song, Hexum wanted the bridge to go into a different direction with some swirling synths that were reminiscent of early Pink Floyd music.[4]
Lyrics edit
The lyric "It's been a wild ride, I wouldn't change a minute" talks about the band's long time making music.[5]
Reception edit
AllMusic said it was Evolver's "Come Original".[6] Punknews said it had a fun chorus with a great bass line in the verses.[7] IGN said it “proves to be a strong start to the album”[8] Sputnik Music said it was “really catchy on this song, as are the lyrics”[9]
Music video edit
The music video, directed by the Malloy Brothers, who previously directed the music video for Amber, shows the band playing the song.
Live performances edit
The song was a popular live closer for many 311 tours.
Personnel edit
Taken from the Evolver CD liner notes[10]
- Nick Hexum – vocals, rhythm guitar
- Doug "S.A." Martinez – vocals (rapping), turntables
- Chad Sexton – drums
- Tim Mahoney – lead guitar
- Aaron "P-Nut" Wills – bass
References edit
- ^ "311 Songs ••• Top Songs / Chart Singles Discography". Music VF.
- ^ "Spotify". open.spotify.com. Retrieved 2024-03-26.
- ^ Hexum, Nick. "Creatures (For a While) by 311". Songfacts.
- ^ "EVOLVER Biography". 311 Archive. 2022-11-23. Retrieved 2023-11-29.
- ^ Moriarty, Colin (2003-12-02). "Evolver". IGN. Retrieved 2023-12-17.
- ^ 311 - Evolver Album Reviews, Songs & More, AllMusic, retrieved 2023-12-03
- ^ Punknews.org (2003-08-01). "311 - Evolver". www.punknews.org. Retrieved 2023-12-24.
- ^ Moriarty, Colin (2003-12-02). "Evolver". IGN. Retrieved 2024-01-14.
- ^ "311 - Evolver (album review ) | Sputnikmusic". www.sputnikmusic.com. Retrieved 2024-01-14.
- ^ 311 - Evolver, Discogs, 2003-07-22, retrieved 2023-11-18