Wikipedia

Draft:Artificial gravity fields

  • Comment: Zero sources cited. Numberguy6 (talk) 18:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
  • Comment: Essentially nothing has changed to address the previous rationale from the last declination. This article is currently not supported by reliable, secondary references. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Gravitational Field edit

What is "The Invention of Artificial Gravity Fields"? If you perceive gravity as a force, it can be defined as the acceleration due to gravity[1]. It's simple if it's seen that way even if some of the mathematical solutions might be difficult to solve. In retrospect, the Gravitational Field[2] in which ever glory of the definition may have been defined, it's about a field that exists between matter and energy. The problem is how to tap into the field. How can anyone understand something that's puzzled everyone since before Isaac Newton[3] existed. It's not evidential enough that space exploration proved that microgravity[4] exists. It seems that Zero gravity was changed to microgravity, and now it's weightlessness[5]. Most people do not believe in gravity. They probably don't what to believe in the force and field. Let's imagine that electrostatic[6], electrostatic discharge[7], and Electrostatic induction[8] are real.

Force Components edit

Hypothetically the "gravitational tensor[9] [structure]" can be used in two forms. The force of gravity is harness able in the dense atmospheric environment and the vacuumed atmospheric environment. It's not easy to find a solution for both densities even if it's easier to find a solution to harness the gravitational field in a dense atmosphere. Both solutions are achieved within resistivities in the range of 5GΩ to 1TΩ. The resistive range is within the high tensor structure moment of being massive. However, the tensor structure isn't active. The tensor structure is active only when it's a part of the circuitry so to speak.

The term I gave to resistive values within the range of being a Force Component:

Force Components edit

Force Components Circuits edit

The active tensor structure of a Force Component allows massive objects to harness the gravitational field at a very low current threshold[10]. In nature, simply the mass and harmonic frequencies of the object alone allow gravitational fields to be active, present or harness able. Imagine the massive body as being an active circuitry. With the absence of active tensor structure Force Components in the so-called circuitry—The research was performed using active Force Components Circuits—or the massive objects' active tensor structure makeup, in that sense the object might not be very massive, the gravitational field of the object is potentially minor or microgravitational. The research shows that the current amplitudes then start to rise. Current amplitudes rise as the gravitational field dissipates because the >Terawatts at very low currents allowed by the active tensor structure is retained since mass is retained. The retention leads to high amplitude feedback in electric current. The high amplitude feedback in electric currents then accumulates between the new and minute active tensor structure having the same mass however condensed and excreted as high amplitude current. That isn't what occurs within the active tensor structure of a massive solar body. It is what occurs when a Force Components Circuits is used as an active tensor structure.

By functioning from actively accumulating elementary charges[11], a Force Components Circuit, builds up an amplitude in free charges in an approximation of unsafe proportions >50 Teravolts p-p in the Voltage Threshold Amplitude (VTA) Nodes. These devices are used for research purposes in the Research Simulation sessions and should never be built by using that current configuration. Firstly, the accumulation of electron and proton charges in the VTA core is comparable to a Neutron star[12] minus a combined particle state. There is no telling what near miss state can be achieved as the VTA reaches saturation. Secondly, hypothetically the VTA core is also comparable to a hypothetical black hole since for approximately 1 second to ~40 minutes, depending on the Force Components Circuit configuration, a VTA accumulates with charges until it is saturated. The saturation of charges reach >50 Teravolts p-p in the Voltage Threshold Amplitude (VTA). The only solution to prevent that is to lower the VTA. The lowered VTA solutions took years to master. Even so, a high VTA low CTA Force Components Circuit is still potentially dangerous. Moreso, one important fact about a VTA is there is only one high polarity per Force Components Circuit. However, at minute nodes beyond the VTA, opposite charges accumulate. That might be a problem, however it's only if two Force Components Circuits are configured with opposite high VTA polarity charges to function as one, can the VTA charges ever get seriously entwined. The fact that we are speaking of artificial gravitational fields contained in a jar, before any truly bad things happen, most likely the jar will break if stressed too far. The other considerable problem with a Single High VTA or Dual High VTAs is the effects of the harness able gravitational fields. In all cases, the solution was to reduce the VTA and thus reducing the wattage amplitudes of the circuits before any hands-on research started in the research project.

Single and Dual VTAs edit

Even if it takes two oppositely charged VTAs to form into a Neutron star or a black hole[13], with the Invention of Artificial Gravitational Fields[14], the potential of a Neutron star or a black hole formation is possible at some unknown threshold of high amplitude wattage at low current, and some unknown threshold of high current amplitude at low wattage. In the ongoing research efforts, it's possible that both likelihoods have been eliminated from the research project and won't be a problem during the hands-on research. Yet I neglect to remember that high amplitude wattage at low current, and high current amplitude at low wattage are still triggers to allow a black hole formation. "It's only one polarity per Force Components Circuit. However, at minute nodes beyond the VTA, opposite charges accumulate.". Depending on the Force Components Circuit configuration, those charges sometimes feed the VTA in conjunction with the VTA charging them up, and other times they take feedback of high current from the VTA in conjunction with the VTA charging them up. Therefore, those nodes are potentially event horizon nodes when they aren't dangerous to manage. "The retention [of charges from the active tensor structure] leads to high amplitude feedback in electric current. The high amplitude feedback in electric currents then accumulates between the new and minute active tensor structure having the same mass however condensed and excreted as high amplitude current.". High >Teravolt VTA discharges as high CTA. No energy is lost during the process because the charges are constantly renewed. The only difference is that CTA discharges at a higher threshold.

The Gravity of Earth Verses Artificial Gravitational Fields edit

If the Artificial gravity is minor by being in the vicinity of a less massive object or an object having Force Components and a weakly active tensor structure makeup such as any object around us here on Earth, or if the less massive objects are influencing each other in the vicinity of the Gravity of Earth[15], it would not be the same as people being in microgravity and experiencing the "Effect[s] of spaceflight on the human body" or the effects of freefalling and Weightlessness. It simply means that the gravitational field is diminished. In microgravity, it will be that objects aren't prone to be very close due to inertia.

High Current Threshold Amplitude edit

Diminished gravitational field of the Artificial Gravitational Fields' active tensor structure allows the increase in CTA. When Force Components are still in the makeup of the body in reference, and the active tensor structure makeup starts to dissipate charges, the current will start to rise in amplitude. "Current amplitudes rise as the gravitational field dissipates because the >Terawatts at very low currents allowed by the active tensor structure is retained since mass is retained.". Whatever happens after the active tensor structure is retained, it means the gravitational field has already been harnessable. That is why it's difficult to distinguish between the two different fields in currently existing theories about the difference between the electromagnetic field and the gravitational field. There are theories in Electrogravitics[16] and Gravitoelectromagnetism[17] that couldn't exactly stick with that being the gravitational field and nothing else. The truth is, I don't think anything good came from those ideas except conspiracies. The confusion and means of deployment are the reasons it is difficult to artificially create a gravitational field source.

Unprecedented Research edit

It is unprecedented and what I have discovered on my own that distinguishes the solution between the two forces, is that the gravitational force has to be managed from a gravitational source from the high threshold of >Terawatts at very low currents and by gaining the vacuumed environment solution without losing the gravitational field integrity. I suppose it can also start by using the right current source, however, that will never lead to deliberately using Force Components in solving the problem. In that sense, there won't ever be a solution to the Unified field theory[18] without coming to a resolution from using a massive object or an object having an active tensor structure to allow the harnessing of the gravitational field. The solution also has applications in harnessing the electromagnetic field simultaneously. However, the gravitational field in those solutions can be completely dissipated.

The Dense Atmospheric Environment edit

The Dense Atmospheric Environment (DAE) gravitational field's active tensor structure is reasonably between an impedance of 1/{2πfC}[19][circular reference] as the field is accessed between the output nodes. With the active tensor structure of functional Force Components Circuits, configured to allow the accumulation of the charge amplitudes to force the impedance to behave differently by not shorting out the power source by turning it completely OFF, or causing feedback allowing dangerously high CTA, the gravitation field is harness able. The Force Components Circuits oscillating at 1GHz allow low current and low capacitance value output impedances to enable a parallel gravitational field to be harnessable in parallel to Dense Atmospheric Environment (DAE).

VTA and Current Control edit

The low capacitance at the output impedance of the power source are only reference nodes. They can be jumped by as low as 1e-5 Ω and retain amplitudes of 140KW p-p at 6mA p-p. The initial threshold wattage before the output capacitor is jumped, or the low-value capacitance output impedance can allow 100TW p-p at <20A p-p in high Current Threshold Amplitude—These devices are used for research purposes in the Research Simulation sessions and should never be built by using that current configuration—The low Current Threshold Amplitude via setting the variable resistor value to a high resistance allowing the current limit at the ground method of lowering output variables without the 1e-5 Ω jumper in parallel of the output nodes, can allow 12mA p-p and a wattage threshold of 140KW p-p. It is a very safe setting for the power source.

The Vacuumed Atmospheric Environment edit

As the Vacuumed Atmospheric Environment (VAE) Densities of the initial threshold wattage of the low-value capacitance output impedance come into play by being placed in parallel to the atmospheric density, the dense atmospheric gravitational field dissipates. However, when the frequency of the naturally oscillating solid state[20][circular reference] power source is still 1GHz, and the accumulated charge amplitudes to force the impedance to behave differently is still achievable, it's possible to retain the harnessed gravitational field. The gravitational field is retainable if the active tensor structure of the Force Components Circuits used to harness the field is retained. That solution was met by retaining the >Terawatts potential of the active tensor structure of the Force Components Circuits and in such a case it was discovered that the Current Threshold Amplitudes (CTA) of the device rises as the parallel output nodes are placed in parallel to the vacuumed environment. The solution however allows both atmospheric densities to complementally work together:.[21]. The solution also shows that the usage of artificial gravity is safer to manage in a dense atmosphere even if the byproduct of high CTA is potentially manageable[22][circular reference] in the Vacuumed Atmospheric Environment if the right circuitry was designed.

Science Without Equations edit

The research project started in 1995 and the final unpublished results were achieved in 2023. Initially, there were equations used in finding solutions to allow the Force Components Circuits to function in the circuit designs. The original solution that was developed from mathematics and the drawing of a circuit schematic, functioned on the first try while simulating it by using the student version of Pspice[23]. The simulation solution showed a value in VTA output of ±750KV. The solution looked like a two-dimensional solid pyramid placed on its side with the peak to the left, and the base to the right. As it should be. It was a very odd DC output. The CTA of the output was approximately ±30mA. I can't recall if it was a single current amplitude passing through the entire circuit. It wasn't a transient solution, however, both polarities of charges were displayed in the solid pyramid. The functional circuit in the hands-on research simply depleted the two 1.5V batteries used in the experiment to power the circuit. My hypothesis is that the 750KV p-p in DC is 750KV/2 = 375KV or the square root of 750KV = 27.386V of some dominating saturated charges. My hypothesis is charges accumulated within the batteries rendering the batteries useless. They each equaled 0V when measured with a Digital Multimeter. The charges didn't even discharge when the batteries were shorted. The circuit was abandoned, and I never researched on the development to know the true worth of the solution. The way I now see it is that two oppositely charged batteries as such can probably be used as a power source.

The currently new withstanding project started in 2000. The first functional device was developed in 2003 and was submitted to be patented. It was only capable of accumulating a few millivolts in free charges, therefore the VTA was approximately 1.5VDC±10mV p-p AC. After that, I worked on transferring the free charges into other circuits. At some time after results were found showing that the newly developed devices might work. However, they seemed dangerous to work with physically.

The newly developed combined devices were developed to function as an oscillating circuit. Therefore, any solution can allow high-amplitude transient currents to pass through the circuit between any nodes. During one hands-on research session, that happened. After it was realized that this kind of science is dangerous and unpredictable, and all that was needed to be known of the physics of the solutions is that the equations to manage the solutions were simply 1/{2πfC} and 2πfC. All that had to be done next was to use a circuit schematic simulation application to enhance the hypotheses of the circuit is supposed to work according to the electrical field of study and the electronic of study.

The student version of Pspice wasn't very promising when used to solve oscillating circuits in transient sweeps that used DC batteries. It is expensive, and I don't know about it now, however, it was limited as a student version. Plus, Pspice can't crunch very high numbers. Most circuit schematic simulation applications can't crunch very high numbers; therefore, they freeze in simulations. Some can't calculate Capacitive Reactance[24][circular reference] and Inductive Reactance circuit configurations for Force Components Circuits; The answers are not transient solutions.

If used with the right simulation tools, the Capacitive Reactance[25][circular reference] and Inductive Reactance[26][circular reference] solutions are profound in their own rights. Hence no equations were derived from the solutions to know how the results could be improved mathematically. What needs to be known from the hands-on research:

  1. The safest procedures to use in fabricating a prototype.
  2. The maximum limitations in output amplitude variables that will prevent dangerous outcomes by using the DAE and VAE solutions.
  3. The threshold output amplitude variables between the harnessable electromagnetic field and the harnessable gravitational field.
  4. Propulsion potential and speed versus the maximum limitations in output amplitude variables.
  5. Field strength of the maximum limitations in output amplitude variables.
  6. What is the difference between Force Components DAE Thrusters[27][28] and just winging it with what already exists[29]? I feel I already knew that nothing that's already possible would work. Even Nikola Tesla invented a potential propulsion system[30]. All the results so far seem like quantum propulsion in the DAE and potentially fillable propulsion in the VAE. This result in the research proves that no one has left the Earth using field thrusters or ionic thrusters.

Currently, data results are from simulating the Force Components Circuits. The simulation results are graphical outputs from the active devices that can power ON from elementary charges as they function as perpetually charged devices. The Simulation Research was performed by using LTspice[31]. Other successful Simulation Research solutions were achieved by simulating the devices by iCircuit[32]

Atmospherically Bound edit

Lately, things started to go in the direction of Einstein's Special Relativity[33] and General Relativity[34]. That is only used in defining the DAE and VAE solutions. The DAE and VAE solutions were atmospherically bound until a way was found to traverse between the two densities without having to switch between solutions. Now one solution can be used in both eventualities.

DAE and VAE edit

The Dense Atmospheric Environment (DAE) solution was found by working with capacitive components[35] and the Capacitive Reactance XC solution, 1/{2πfC}. The Vacuumed Atmospheric Environment solutions were found by using the potential of resistivity in a vacuum, which is potentially in the range of 1e-6 Ω to 1e-10 Ω, it's a definition of the Inductive Reactance XL solution, 2πfC, however, any XL ≥1e-5 Ω, is potentially a failing vacuumed environment solution if a solution in the range of 1e-6 Ω to 1e-10 Ω cannot be achieved. The original Vacuum Permittivity[36] solution requires a 3 feet distance between each resistive value in an array, and no actual solution exists. Perhaps if an Ion Thruster[37] is referenceable as a solution, we can imagine charges from elements may suffice as charges that can be used in parallel of the vacuumed environment to allow propulsion, however, those charges aren't an entire field array that can be used in a propulsion scheme. In this solution, the output nodes are capacitive as well as inductive since the resistivity between the VAE aligns with having a solution when the parallel resistivity is tiny and reactive as an inductive value and open and reactive as a capacitive value in the DAE. The output nodes allow an atmospheric density output in parallel of it no matter what. Either way, it's seen, in this case with a single resistive value high or low, or in respect of being a single resistive value, XC = XL in the VAE and output values between the output nodes are achieved, and the XC output nodes as the infinite value in parallel of the DAE is powerful. In that case, the current solution allows outputs between and current flow through resistivity in the range of 1e-10 Ω to infinity, and the DAE solution equals the VAE solution. That is not a description of equal amplitudes in wattage that is available to be used in parallel with the densities. It is that even though the amplitude in threshold wattage is low in the VAE solution and high in the DAE solution, there is power to allow propulsion. Plus, the right flight array will allow equally available propulsion power to traverse either density.

By using the active tensor structure of the Force Components Circuits to harness and retain the gravitational field, if any residual power accumulated between the 1e-6 Ω to 1e-10 Ω (ReN5[38]) output nodes is greater than 14.765W p-p, the electromagnetic field was not harnessed. The gravitational field was harnessed and can lift 1lb, 5 feet in 3 seconds. That can be potentially lifted and the lifting potential increases as the wattage usage amplitudes are combined in series, parallel, or series-parallel, forming an array by using a single power source or multiple power sources. A single power source can manage thousands of components placed in parallel, series, or series-parallel of an output node. However, things would become more interesting if array grids were used, and each grid was managed by an independent power source. Potentially power would not diminish at the output grid if thousands of components in parallel add up to 1e-10 Ω, even below that threshold in resistivity, the limitation might be 1e-11 Ω. With each independent power source powering a grid, the stability and maximum power potential of each grid are enforced.

The field at the output node can be used to interact with any form of matter in parallel with the DAE and VAE.

It's OK to ignore the low amplitudes of accumulated wattage[39] values between the ReN5 component in parallel of the VAE. The resistive value (1e-10 Ω) of the component represents the parallel status of the output nodes. The solution is a great feat even at those minute amplitudes in wattage. There are better solutions[40]. They are simply not stable solutions. Even the low-value solution is better than any output you can work on within a hands-on experiment. A regular circuit in this case allows outputs of nothing.

Superconductivity[41] in the Research edit

Room Temperature Superconductivity[42] is the byproduct in the absence of the gravitational field between the output nodes in parallel with the vacuumed atmospheric threshold component.

Notes edit

  • Einstein tensor[43]
    • The tensor would allow an active force to withhold the formation of interacting masses of matter and energy between the Dense Atmospheric Threshold and Vacuumed Atmospheric Threshold, if not, the tensor is weak.
  • Ricci curvature: The difference between the gravitational field being parallel to the Dense Atmospheric Threshold and Vacuumed Atmospheric Threshold:
    • The Gravitational constant is the threshold between Permittivity and Vacuum Permittivity[44] allowed by the harnessing of the gravitational field.
  • Euclidean space:
    • In relative terms, space exists when a solution allowed by a harnessed gravitational field causes activity between the parallel Vacuumed Atmospheric Threshold.
  • The terms "Dense Atmospheric Threshold" and "Vacuumed Atmospheric Threshold":
    • The latter term concerns the gravitational field being parallel to a vacuumed environment. The former term denotes the gravitational field being parallel to any other massive medium or being parallel with the complete area of the solid mass.
  • Microgravity and the Force of Artificial Gravity are detrimental on the biological makeup of living organisms[45].

References edit

  1. ^ "Motion of Free Falling Object". Glenn Research Center.
  2. ^ "Sources and Types of Gravitational Waves". LIGO Caltech.
  3. ^ "Isaac Newton". HISTORY.COM EDITORS. March 10, 2015.
  4. ^ "What is Microgravity?". NASA. Feb 13, 2009.
  5. ^ "Why Are Astronauts Weightless?". Veritasium.
  6. ^ "Radiation Shielding for Deep Space Missions". NASA.
  7. ^ "The Heliopause Electrostatic Rapid Transit System (HERTS)" (PDF). NASA-MSFC--Advanced Concepts Office—.
  8. ^ "Electrostatic Induction". Britannica.com.
  9. ^ "10:02 / 28:22 • Curvature Einstein's Field Equations of General Relativity Explained". Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky.
  10. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman. "DAE VAE". YouTube.
  11. ^ "3 Subatomic Stories: Charged leptons". Fermilab.
  12. ^ "LIGO Scientists Spy Neutron Star Smash-Up That Blew Bling Into Space". seti.org. Oct 18, 2017.
  13. ^ "SETI Talks: Black Holes Are Real. How Do They Shape Structure and Evolution in Our Universe?". SETI Institute.
  14. ^ Angie, Bukley; William, Paloski; Gilles, Clément. "PHYSICS OF ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY" (PDF). NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  15. ^ "How Strong is the Force of Gravity on Earth?". universetoday.com. 6 December 2016.
  16. ^ Paul, Wagner (December 23, 2019). "Electrogravitics: Antigravity, Tesla, and a Military Cover-Up". gaia.com.
  17. ^ Bahram, Mashhoon (2003). Gravitoelectromagnetism: A Brief Review. Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA. arXiv:gr-qc/0311030.
  18. ^ Andrew, Zimmerman Jones (May 15, 2018). "Albert Einstein: What Is Unified Field Theory?". thoughtco.com.
  19. ^ "Capacitor". wikipedia.org.
  20. ^ "Solid-state electronics". wikipedia.org.
  21. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman. "ReN5". YouTube.
  22. ^ "American wire gauge". wikipedia.org.
  23. ^ "Achieve Peak Circuit Performance". EMA. OrCAD.
  24. ^ "Electrical reactance". wikipedia. wikipedia.org.
  25. ^ "Electrical reactance". wikipedia. wikipedia.org.
  26. ^ "Electrical reactance". wikipedia. wikipedia.org.
  27. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman (PAUSEWATCH). "RELOCATION STRATEGY; Electric Propulsion Engines (FAD)". Climate CoLab.
  28. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman (PAUSEWATCH). "ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION USING CIRCUIT BOARD OR MICROCHIP III". Climate CoLab.
  29. ^ "The Next Generation of Ionic Plasma Thrusters (BSI MARK 2)". youtube.com. Plasma Channel.
  30. ^ "Nikola Tesla's flying saucer: electromagnetic field lift experiments". nexusnewsfeed.com.
  31. ^ "LTspice". Analog Devices.
  32. ^ "iCircuit". icircuitapp. Krueger Systems Inc.
  33. ^ Vicky, Stein (February 1, 2022). "Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity". space.com.
  34. ^ Nola, Taylor Tillman; Meghan, Bartels; Scott, Dutfield (May 14, 2023). "What is the theory of general relativity?". space.com.
  35. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman. "DAE VAE". YouTube.
  36. ^ "Vacuum Permittivity". sciencedirect.com.
  37. ^ Dan, M. Goebel; Ira, Katz. "Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters" (PDF). Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
  38. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman. "ReN5". YouTube.
  39. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman. "18 11 2022 23 45 27 REC". YouTube.
  40. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman. "18 11 2022 23 45 27 REC". YouTube.
  41. ^ "superconductivity". britannica.com. 8 February 2024.
  42. ^ Braithwaite, Sherman. "Superconductivity in a Vacuumed Environment". YouTube.
  43. ^ "10:02 / 28:22 • Curvature Einstein's Field Equations of General Relativity Explained". Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky.
  44. ^ "Vacuum Permittivity". sciencedirect.com.
  45. ^ ADAM, HADHAZY (April 2017). "Artificial gravity's attraction". aerospaceamerica.aiaa.org.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Artificial_gravity_fields&oldid=1212724294"