Differential dynamic programming

Differential dynamic programming (DDP) is an optimal control algorithm of the trajectory optimization class. The algorithm was introduced in 1966 by Mayne[1] and subsequently analysed in Jacobson and Mayne's eponymous book.[2] The algorithm uses locally-quadratic models of the dynamics and cost functions, and displays quadratic convergence. It is closely related to Pantoja's step-wise Newton's method.[3][4]

Finite-horizon discrete-time problems

edit

The dynamics

  (1)

describe the evolution of the state   given the control   from time   to time  . The total cost   is the sum of running costs   and final cost  , incurred when starting from state   and applying the control sequence   until the horizon is reached:

 

where  , and the   for   are given by Eq. 1. The solution of the optimal control problem is the minimizing control sequence   Trajectory optimization means finding   for a particular  , rather than for all possible initial states.

Dynamic programming

edit

Let   be the partial control sequence   and define the cost-to-go   as the partial sum of costs from   to  :

 

The optimal cost-to-go or value function at time   is the cost-to-go given the minimizing control sequence:

 

Setting  , the dynamic programming principle reduces the minimization over an entire sequence of controls to a sequence of minimizations over a single control, proceeding backwards in time:

  (2)

This is the Bellman equation.

Differential dynamic programming

edit

DDP proceeds by iteratively performing a backward pass on the nominal trajectory to generate a new control sequence, and then a forward-pass to compute and evaluate a new nominal trajectory. We begin with the backward pass. If

 

is the argument of the   operator in Eq. 2, let   be the variation of this quantity around the  -th   pair:

 

and expand to second order

  (3)

The   notation used here is a variant of the notation of Morimoto where subscripts denote differentiation in denominator layout.[5] Dropping the index   for readability, primes denoting the next time-step  , the expansion coefficients are

 

The last terms in the last three equations denote contraction of a vector with a tensor. Minimizing the quadratic approximation (3) with respect to   we have

  (4)

giving an open-loop term   and a feedback gain term  . Plugging the result back into (3), we now have a quadratic model of the value at time  :

 

Recursively computing the local quadratic models of   and the control modifications  , from   down to  , constitutes the backward pass. As above, the Value is initialized with  . Once the backward pass is completed, a forward pass computes a new trajectory:

 

The backward passes and forward passes are iterated until convergence.

edit

Differential dynamic programming is a second-order algorithm like Newton's method. It therefore takes large steps toward the minimum and often requires regularization and/or line-search to achieve convergence.[6][7] Regularization in the DDP context means ensuring that the   matrix in Eq. 4 is positive definite. Line-search in DDP amounts to scaling the open-loop control modification   by some  .

Monte Carlo version

edit

Sampled differential dynamic programming (SaDDP) is a Monte Carlo variant of differential dynamic programming.[8][9][10] It is based on treating the quadratic cost of differential dynamic programming as the energy of a Boltzmann distribution. This way the quantities of DDP can be matched to the statistics of a multidimensional normal distribution. The statistics can be recomputed from sampled trajectories without differentiation.

Sampled differential dynamic programming has been extended to Path Integral Policy Improvement with Differential Dynamic Programming.[11] This creates a link between differential dynamic programming and path integral control,[12] which is a framework of stochastic optimal control.

Constrained problems

edit

Interior Point Differential dynamic programming (IPDDP) is an interior-point method generalization of DDP that can address the optimal control problem with nonlinear state and input constraints.[13]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Mayne, D. Q. (1966). "A second-order gradient method of optimizing non-linear discrete time systems". Int J Control. 3: 85–95. doi:10.1080/00207176608921369.
  2. ^ Mayne, David Q.; Jacobson, David H. (1970). Differential dynamic programming. New York: American Elsevier Pub. Co. ISBN 978-0-444-00070-5.
  3. ^ de O. Pantoja, J. F. A. (1988). "Differential dynamic programming and Newton's method". International Journal of Control. 47 (5): 1539–1553. doi:10.1080/00207178808906114. ISSN 0020-7179.
  4. ^ Liao, L. Z.; C. A Shoemaker (1992). "Advantages of differential dynamic programming over Newton's method for discrete-time optimal control problems". Cornell University. hdl:1813/5474.
  5. ^ Morimoto, J.; G. Zeglin; C.G. Atkeson (2003). "Minimax differential dynamic programming: Application to a biped walking robot". Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2003.(IROS 2003). Proceedings. 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on. Vol. 2. pp. 1927–1932.
  6. ^ Liao, L. Z; C. A Shoemaker (1991). "Convergence in unconstrained discrete-time differential dynamic programming". IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 36 (6): 692. doi:10.1109/9.86943.
  7. ^ Tassa, Y. (2011). Theory and implementation of bio-mimetic motor controllers (PDF) (Thesis). Hebrew University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2012-02-27.
  8. ^ "Sampled differential dynamic programming". 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). doi:10.1109/IROS.2016.7759229. S2CID 1338737.
  9. ^ Rajamäki, Joose; Hämäläinen, Perttu (June 2018). Regularizing Sampled Differential Dynamic Programming - IEEE Conference Publication. 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC). pp. 2182–2189. doi:10.23919/ACC.2018.8430799. S2CID 243932441. Retrieved 2018-10-19.
  10. ^ Rajamäki, Joose (2018). Random Search Algorithms for Optimal Control. Aalto University. ISBN 978-952-60-8156-4. ISSN 1799-4942.
  11. ^ Lefebvre, Tom; Crevecoeur, Guillaume (July 2019). "Path Integral Policy Improvement with Differential Dynamic Programming". 2019 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). pp. 739–745. doi:10.1109/AIM.2019.8868359. hdl:1854/LU-8623968. ISBN 978-1-7281-2493-3. S2CID 204816072.
  12. ^ Theodorou, Evangelos; Buchli, Jonas; Schaal, Stefan (May 2010). "Reinforcement learning of motor skills in high dimensions: A path integral approach". 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 2397–2403. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2010.5509336. ISBN 978-1-4244-5038-1. S2CID 15116370.
  13. ^ Pavlov, Andrei; Shames, Iman; Manzie, Chris (2020). "Interior Point Differential Dynamic Programming". arXiv:2004.12710 [math.OC].
edit