Category talk:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of WatchtowerJihad
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Ilmari Karonen
has it occured to you that these not only seem like completely unrelated vandals, but actually are unrelated vandals, not a vast AOL conspiracy to make it seem like different people.. please stop stalking random AOL users, thank you ever so much--172.148.156.116 20:03, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Not to mention, you seem to be including known AOL denial of service vandals, and lumping them in with link spammers, advertisers, juveniles, etc.. etc.. essentially you've compiled a compendium of recent AOL vandals over the past couple of months, and decided to label them all as the same person--172.148.156.116 20:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Would you care to explain, then, why these accounts and IPs have vandalized the same articles and reverted back to versions vandalized by one another? (As a matter of fact, I have no proof that the registered users in this category edit from AOL; it's merely the IPs participating in the vandalism that are, with only one expection I know of so far, AOL proxies.) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 02:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- please don't continue to tag sharedips as sockpuppets, thank you--64.12.117.8 03:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've listed them in the category description now. Happy? —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 04:41, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- please don't continue to tag sharedips as sockpuppets, thank you--64.12.117.8 03:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Would you care to explain, then, why these accounts and IPs have vandalized the same articles and reverted back to versions vandalized by one another? (As a matter of fact, I have no proof that the registered users in this category edit from AOL; it's merely the IPs participating in the vandalism that are, with only one expection I know of so far, AOL proxies.) —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 02:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
User "AOL account" keeps vandalising my page claiming I am WatchtowerJihad. If any of you are administrators, would you please help me?Xanax is my FRIEND 17:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- This situation was apparently based on a misunderstanding, and has hopefully been resolved. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 03:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)