Céa's lemma is a lemma in mathematics. Introduced by Jean Céa in his Ph.D. dissertation, it is an important tool for proving error estimates for the finite element method applied to elliptic partial differential equations.

Lemma statement edit

Let   be a real Hilbert space with the norm   Let   be a bilinear form with the properties

  •   for some constant   and all   in   (continuity)
  •   for some constant   and all   in   (coercivity or  -ellipticity).

Let   be a bounded linear operator. Consider the problem of finding an element   in   such that

  for all   in  

Consider the same problem on a finite-dimensional subspace   of   so,   in   satisfies

  for all   in  

By the Lax–Milgram theorem, each of these problems has exactly one solution. Céa's lemma states that

  for all   in  

That is to say, the subspace solution   is "the best" approximation of   in   up to the constant  

The proof is straightforward

  for all   in  

We used the  -orthogonality of   and  

 

which follows directly from  

  for all   in  .

Note: Céa's lemma holds on complex Hilbert spaces also, one then uses a sesquilinear form   instead of a bilinear one. The coercivity assumption then becomes   for all   in   (notice the absolute value sign around  ).

Error estimate in the energy norm edit

 
The subspace solution   is the projection of   onto the subspace   in respect to the inner product  .

In many applications, the bilinear form   is symmetric, so

  for all   in  

This, together with the above properties of this form, implies that   is an inner product on   The resulting norm

 

is called the energy norm, since it corresponds to a physical energy in many problems. This norm is equivalent to the original norm  

Using the  -orthogonality of   and   and the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality

  for all   in  .

Hence, in the energy norm, the inequality in Céa's lemma becomes

  for all   in  

(notice that the constant   on the right-hand side is no longer present).

This states that the subspace solution   is the best approximation to the full-space solution   in respect to the energy norm. Geometrically, this means that   is the projection of the solution   onto the subspace   in respect to the inner product   (see the adjacent picture).

Using this result, one can also derive a sharper estimate in the norm  . Since

  for all   in  ,

it follows that

  for all   in  .

An application of Céa's lemma edit

We will apply Céa's lemma to estimate the error of calculating the solution to an elliptic differential equation by the finite element method.

 
A string with fixed endpoints under the influence of a force pointing down.

Consider the problem of finding a function   satisfying the conditions

 

where   is a given continuous function.

Physically, the solution   to this two-point boundary value problem represents the shape taken by a string under the influence of a force such that at every point   between   and   the force density is   (where   is a unit vector pointing vertically, while the endpoints of the string are on a horizontal line, see the adjacent picture). For example, that force may be the gravity, when   is a constant function (since the gravitational force is the same at all points).

Let the Hilbert space   be the Sobolev space   which is the space of all square-integrable functions   defined on   that have a weak derivative on   with   also being square integrable, and   satisfies the conditions   The inner product on this space is

  for all   and   in  

After multiplying the original boundary value problem by   in this space and performing an integration by parts, one obtains the equivalent problem

  for all   in  ,

with

 ,

and

 

It can be shown that the bilinear form   and the operator   satisfy the assumptions of Céa's lemma.

 
A function in   (in red), and the typical collection of basis functions in   (in blue).

In order to determine a finite-dimensional subspace   of   consider a partition

 

of the interval   and let   be the space of all continuous functions that are affine on each subinterval in the partition (such functions are called piecewise-linear). In addition, assume that any function in   takes the value 0 at the endpoints of   It follows that   is a vector subspace of   whose dimension is   (the number of points in the partition that are not endpoints).

Let   be the solution to the subspace problem

  for all   in  

so one can think of   as of a piecewise-linear approximation to the exact solution   By Céa's lemma, there exists a constant   dependent only on the bilinear form   such that

  for all   in  

To explicitly calculate the error between   and   consider the function   in   that has the same values as   at the nodes of the partition (so   is obtained by linear interpolation on each interval   from the values of   at interval's endpoints). It can be shown using Taylor's theorem that there exists a constant   that depends only on the endpoints   and   such that

 

for all   in   where   is the largest length of the subintervals   in the partition, and the norm on the right-hand side is the L2 norm.

This inequality then yields an estimate for the error

 

Then, by substituting   in Céa's lemma it follows that

 

where   is a different constant from the above (it depends only on the bilinear form, which implicitly depends on the interval  ).

This result is of a fundamental importance, as it states that the finite element method can be used to approximately calculate the solution of our problem, and that the error in the computed solution decreases proportionately to the partition size   Céa's lemma can be applied along the same lines to derive error estimates for finite element problems in higher dimensions (here the domain of   was in one dimension), and while using higher order polynomials for the subspace  

References edit

  • Céa, Jean (1964). Approximation variationnelle des problèmes aux limites (PDF) (PhD thesis). Annales de l'Institut Fourier 14. Vol. 2. pp. 345–444. Retrieved 2010-11-27. (Original work from J. Céa)
  • Johnson, Claes (1987). Numerical solution of partial differential equations by the finite element method. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-34514-6.
  • Monk, Peter (2003). Finite element methods for Maxwell's equations. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-850888-3.