Ben Carson office furnishing scandal
On February 27, 2018, it was reported that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development had spent $31,561 on a set of dining room furniture for the office of HUD secretary Ben Carson in late 2017, in apparent violation of federal law requiring Congressional approval for department head office redecoration costs exceeding $5000. Emails released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) contradicted initial agency statements that the Secretary was uninvolved in the purchase decision, which took place amid extensive proposed budget cuts at that agency, affecting programs benefiting the poor and elderly. Media coverage of the purchase led to its cancellation. Inquiries into the propriety of the purchase were made by the Office of Special Counsel and House Oversight Committee.
The news of the office expenditures came amid questions over Carson's son's involvement in a HUD-sponsored "listening tour". Ben Carson Jr. is a federal contractor, and HUD lawyers warned the secretary that his involvement would constitute an apparent conflict of interest in violation of federal ethics rules; in February, Secretary Carson was pressured into requesting an investigation of his son's involvement by the inspector general of HUD.
The custom-made furniture, ordered on December 21 from Sebree and Associates based in Carson's hometown of Baltimore, included a mahogany table, ten chairs with velvet upholstery, a sideboard, and a hutch. According to purchase documents and the dealer, the table pedestals featured "hand applied ebonized inlay with bell flowers topped by hand carved scrolls and a fluted column." Delivery was scheduled for May 2018.
In November 2017, Helen G. Foster, former Chief Administrative Officer at HUD, filed a whistleblower complaint with the Office of Special Counsel, alleging that she had been demoted and transferred as retaliation after refusing to secure funding for the redecoration of the Secretary's office, as well as for exposing a $10-million budget shortfall, and for protesting being barred from handling certain FOIA requests. Foster stated that, beginning prior to Carson's confirmation in March, she had been repeatedly pressured by Carson's wife Candy Carson, through interim secretary Craig Clemmensen, to secure the funding in violation of the law. After conferring with HUD's acting assistant chief financial officer for budget on February 13th, Foster claimed to have sent HUD officials the text of the Antideficiency Act requiring Congressional approval of the purchase. She reported being told "$5,000 will not even buy a decent chair."
Public statements from HUD officialsEdit
On February 27th, following initial media reports, HUD spokesman Raffi Williams initially claimed that HUD had spent only $3200 for new blinds for the secretary and deputy secretary's offices, and that the chairs then in the secretary's office had come from the basement of the HUD building. That same day, the organization American Oversight sued HUD to determine how much money had actually been spent on office redecoration.
Williams claimed that Secretary Carson and his wife had not requested the new table and were unaware of its purchase, and that the purchasing decision was made by career staffers, but that the secretary did not believe the cost to be excessive, and did not intend to return the items. However, internal emails released on March 14th – under a FOIA request made by American Oversight – contradicted those claims, with one message from a career staffer to Carson's assistant referring to "printouts of the furniture the Secretary and Mrs. Carson picked out". Presented with the discrepancy, Williams acknowledged that "when presented with options by professional staff, Mrs. Carson participated in the selection of specific styles."
Williams claimed that Congressional approval was not sought for the purchase because it addressed a "building-wide need", though the dining set would be located in Carson's personal suite. He also claimed that Foster's reassignment was part of a normal rotation.
On March 1st, HUD confirmed that Carson had requested the furniture order be cancelled.
HUD announced on March 15th that its chief financial officer Irving Dennis would lead a task force to combat "waste, fraud and abuse" at the agency.
On March 19th, Carson testified before the House Appropriations Committee, claiming that he left the purchasing decision to his wife, and that they expressed concerns to staff over the cost. He denied that the furniture constituted a decorating expense, citing apparent safety concerns with the state of the old furniture, and he denied knowing about whistleblower Helen Foster. Congressman David Price, Democrat from North Carolina and ranking member of the committee, called the purchase one of several "major ethical lapses" at HUD, citing "failure to control funds and provide legally required notifications to Congress", "apparently false public statements that intended to obscure the truth about the secretary's involvement", and "the reassignment of the whistleblower who brought these problems to the public's attention."
Following her initial complaint, Helen Foster was contacted for an interview with the Office of Special Counsel, which has 120 days from the date of the complaint to determine whether it will launch an official investigation. Foster's lawyer, Joe Kaplan, said the OSC could determine to move forward as quickly as the week of March 1.
Trey Gowdy, Republican chairman of the House Oversight Committee, requested records relating to HUD's furniture purchases in 2017, to "determine whether HUD adhered to the applicable spending limitations", as well as documentation relating to Helen Foster's claims of retaliation. Gowdy set a deadline of March 14 for the delivery of these documents.
In May 2019, the Government Accountability Office's general counsel confirmed to Congress that HUD broke the law when it ordered the dining set and a new dishwasher and water treatment system, specifically violating section 710 of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Acts of 2016 and 2017, and the Antideficiency Act.
Editorials strongly criticized HUD's purchases and Carson's reaction. Vanity Fair called Carson's claimed lack of awareness of the purchase "truly amazing". The Baltimore Sun called the scandal part of a pattern in which Trump administration officials "shamelessly gamed the system for their personal benefit".
Late-night comedians mocked the purchase and HUD's response. Trevor Noah of The Daily Show said that valuing a good chair at $5000 would make Carson "the worst Price Is Right contestant", and suggested the department use the money to build low-income housing instead, in accordance with its mission. Late Night host Seth Meyers said of Carson that "the man loves furniture. Based on his personality he’s probably been mistaken for furniture."
- Thrush, Glenn (February 27, 2018). "Ben Carson's HUD Spends $31,000 on Dining Set for His Office". The New York Times. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Marsh, Rene; Wallace, Gregory (March 14, 2018). "First on CNN: Emails show Ben, Candy Carson selected $31,000 dining set". CNN. Retrieved 14 March 2018.
- Ebbs, Stephanie (March 1, 2018). "Ben Carson asks HUD to cancel order for $31,000 dining set". ABC News. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Marsh, Rene (February 27, 2018). "'$5,000 will not even buy a decent chair': HUD staffer files complaint over Ben Carson office redecoration". CNN. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Marsh, Rene; Levitt, Ross (February 28, 2018). "See HUD's $31,000 mahogany dining set". CNN. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Ebbs, Stephanie (February 27, 2018). "HUD spent $31,000 on new dining set for Ben Carson's office suite". ABC News. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Booker, Brakkton (February 28, 2018). "House Oversight Panel Asks HUD For Documents Amid Accusations Of Lavish Spending". WNYC. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Swaine, Jon; Jacobs, Ben (February 27, 2018). "US official: I was demoted for rejecting Ben Carson's costly office revamp". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- @RealBenCarson (February 28, 2018). "Thank you to so many who have expressed concern for me and my family over the latest accusations. Rest assured that there has been no dishonesty or wrongdoing by us. All the numbers and evidence are being gathered and a full disclosure is forthcoming. 1/2" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- Fang, Marina (March 1, 2018). "Ben Carson Cancels $31,000 Furniture Order After Ethics Questions". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Shuham, Matt (March 1, 2018). "House Oversight Committee Asks Carson For Records On $30,000 Office Furniture". Talking Points Memo. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Mangan, Dan (March 15, 2018). "White House 'looking into' $31,561 dining room set purchase under HUD Secretary Ben Carson". CNBC. Retrieved 15 March 2018.
- Ebbs, Stephanie (March 20, 2018). "Carson contends he and his wife complained about $31,000 furniture cost". ABC News. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
- CNN, Veronica Stracqualursi. "Watchdog: Housing department broke the law with $40,000 furniture purchase for Ben Carson". CNN. Retrieved 2019-05-22.
- Armstrong, Thomas H. (May 16, 2019). "U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development—Compliance with Statutory Notification Requirement and the Antideficiency Act" (PDF) (Letter). Letter to Susan Collins and David Price. Retrieved 22 May 2019.
- Levin, Bess (February 28, 2018). "Ben Carson Thinks His $31,000 Office Redesign Was Totally Reasonable". Vanity Fair. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- "Ben Carson and the Trump lifestyle". The Baltimore Sun. February 28, 2018. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- Wright, Tolly (March 1, 2018). "Late Night Blasts Ben Carson's $31,000 HUD Office Dining Set". Vulture.com. Retrieved 1 March 2018.