Content deleted Content added
Reply |
|||
Line 214:
Came here via WP:3O. The [https://www.theguardian.com/food/2021/apr/03/how-to-eat-shakshuka Guardian article] does mention Egypt. While this is not a highest-quality source, the sources that are used in the article to support the Maghrebi origin are of similar calibre (e.g., the Jewish Chronicle article). Therefore I think it'd make sense to call it North African dish in the lede. This information should also be added to the article itself, naturally. [[User:Alaexis|Alaexis]]<sub>[[User_talk:Alaexis|¿question?]]</sub> 12:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
:Technically, this is a fourth opinion. Apparently, the OP has has also approached another editor ([[Special:Diff/1219283397|their claim]] that they stopped edit warring after receiving the first warning is obviously incorrect, and judging by what they wrote, it's fair to assume that they still don't understand what edit warring is).
:Anyway, since claims about history that are made by non-specialists are worthless, the thing to do would be to rewrite that section using the highest quality RS we can find (like we do for similar articles). I already have one in mind, and while not ideal, it's still better than what's in the articles. I'll see if I can find another one. [[User:M.Bitton|M.Bitton]] ([[User talk:M.Bitton|talk]]) 15:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
| |||