Content deleted Content added
JackkBrown (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
Line 162:
::{{Ping|Reywas92}} I didn't say chicken can't be put in pasta (it's not illegal), I said it's an objectively wrong combination; I don't want to list the reasons here (if you like eating it, I'm happy for you). The Americans have their strengths, such as '''cinema''', just as we have ours, such as '''cuisine''', so if we Italians say it's an objectively wrong combination, we're very, very reliable. Anyway, let's go back to the original topic, which is not that. [[User:JackkBrown|JacktheBrown]] ([[User talk:JackkBrown|talk]]) 01:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
:::{{u|JackkBrown}}, you have been an editor long enough to know quite well that your personal opinion is utterly irrelevant on Wikipedia and that a statement like {{u|we Italians say it's an objectively wrong combination, we're very, very reliable}} constitutes [[WP:OR|Original research]] which is ''forbidden'' on Wikipedia. Who appointed you the spokesperson for "we Italians"? Hundreds of millions of people worldwide frequently eat chicken and pasta dishes without being poisoned or vomiting, so your objectivity in this matter is in question. All that matters is what reliable sources say, not what anonymous Wikipedia editors say. You know this. [[User:Cullen328|Cullen328]] ([[User talk:Cullen328|talk]]) 02:37, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
:::The article describes the closely related fettuccine al burro and fettucine Alfredo, both invented in and still served in Italy. It is objectively correct to say it's Italian cuisine, and then we can say the heavier recipe with cream is an American variant. Just because your nonna makes it a certain way doesn't mean this can't say how these recipes are related. [[User:Reywas92|Reywas92]]<sup>[[User talk:Reywas92|Talk]]</sup> 02:55, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
| |||