Talk:Im Haarknoten wohnt eine Dame

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sam Sailor (talk | contribs) at 16:21, 5 August 2018 (→‎Combine content: Stop FORUMSHOPPING and edit-warring). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sam Sailor in topic Combine content
WikiProject iconNovels Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
WikiProject iconPoetry Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Combine content

The edit wasn't a pure redirection. The content was kept and copied across to the author page. Since the article isn't deleted anybody can expand it later down the line. I think we should redirect until such time. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 08:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

So your opinion can just override the outcome of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Im Haarknoten wohnt eine Dame (3rd nomination)? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:26, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Well I didn't mention that the content will be kept. And the AFD might be a bit confusing since the keep vote might mean they don't want to delete the article. Shall we do a discussion of the merge? Just to be clearer with the intent. Shall we do merge for now and let people discuss it in the talk page if they oppose? --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 09:59, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
That'd be this discussion, presumably. › Mortee talk 10:44, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
Any way works for me. I'm out and about and editing from a tablet. So I'm quite limited in what I can edit. I can't do any major edits. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 11:07, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
The outcome at the AfDs was "Keep". The discussion on the author's talk page has no consensus to merge. Until a different outcome emerges, I'm going to revert the REDIRECT. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:06, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Tyw7: Please stop edit-warring against the consensus at AFD, you are effectively WP:FORUMSHOPPING. Sam Sailor 16:20, 5 August 2018 (UTC)Reply