Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Decrease
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
Click here to return to Requests for page protection. Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
| |
Remove Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing — The protection is not longer necessary because it didn't disruptive editing anymore by IP address is been a while for Semi protection since November 15, 2017 it has no expired set decreased protection needs to be done. 63.143.202.112 (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- This request verges on the incomprehensible. The argument seems to be that the protection is unnecessary because IP editors are no longer disrupting the page? Those IP editors wouldn't be able to edit the page; that's how semi-protection works. Not to say I'm against lowering the protection - I'm neutral - but this request isn't doing itself any favours. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done I think the middle of the playoffs is possibly the worst time to test unprotection for this article. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
