Committed identity: c95a739811fb004d63ac532409a62fe88d1b488ecd2ee6761396a60b590c81b0ba0b96c5eb0b9d2232bd45c418630dc425d48ffdb8067d83b9aacf367706384e is a SHA-256 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Reviewer granted edit

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled granted edit

 

Hi 98Tigerius, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Promotion of List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023) edit

Congratulations, 98Tigerius! The list you nominated, List of Music Bank Chart winners (2023), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hierarchy (TV series) edit unconstructive? edit

Why did you revert this edit I made to the page of the TV series Hierarchy as "non-constructive"? I was doing simple copyediting because the previous sentence wasn't written correctly (it was missing a verb to tie everything up) and adding a citation because the text in the lede didn't seem to be restated with a citation in the body. I see no reason as to why my edit would be unconstructive—I wasn't vandalizing or adding unsourced info or anything. Wuju Daisuki (talk) 21:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Because there's nothing wrong with sentence but I already modified it and apologize if I offended you with the revert. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women's Volleyball ranking for Olympics 2024 edit

Greetings, I did the modifications to the score because since the first week of the VNL is over, the ranking has changed. That is why I modified it using this website: https://en.volleyballworld.com/volleyball/world-ranking/women. 166.62.170.41 (talk) 23:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

There's no need to changed it as that's the rank of the 24 teams that competed from last year's Olympic qualification tournaments. If you want to modified then do it in FIVB Senior World Rankings. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 08:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply