Talk:Breadwinners (TV series)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Hot Stop 08:39, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

---

Breadwinners (TV series) → Breadwinners – There is no other article on Wikipedia entitled "Breadwinners," so the parenthetical is unnecessary disambiguation. A "see also" hatnote to "Breadwinner" should be suitable. -- Wikipedical (talk) 08:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

• Oppose - breadwinners means Breadwinner model, but current redirect to the breadwinner dab works just fine. Btw the argument "There is no other article on Wikipedia entitled _____" is contrary to WP:DISAMBIGUATION. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose due to Breadwinner model, though surprised how underdeveloped that article is. Zarcadia (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose. The nomination is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of policy. WP:DAB says A "topic covered by Wikipedia" is either the main subject of an article, or a minor subject covered by an article in addition to the article's main subject. The primary topic for "breadwinners" is the plural form of "the member of a family who earns the money to support the others", which is covered in the article Breadwinner model. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:52, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
• Strong oppose this clearly is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The primary topic of "breadwinners" is as the plural of breadwinner, specifically the topic covered in the Breadwinner model article. Both "breadwinner" and "breadwinners" should redirect to that article. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 08:37, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose as it is per above. The dab Breadwinner is meaning a Breadwinner model and it is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, although the Breadwinner model reads like a stub. JJ98 (Talk) 21:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose. Breadwinners should continue to redirect to Breadwinner. The TV series is not the primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Ketta

Two questions about the character Ketta from this show. 1. Who is she voiced by?

2. Is she a duck or a goose? She looks kind of like Swaysway, but she sometimes says "HONK!" in the middle of sentences which makes me believe she is a goose. She is also white, and Buhdeuce and Swaysway are green, so...does that mean she could be a goose and not a duck?! 67.85.241.84 (talk) 20:37, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Ketta is voiced by Kari Wahlgren. I am also unsure of her species. SalmonCat (talk) 14:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Question?

Are you sure Breadwinners is on Disney? I tough it was on Nick? Remington Tufflips (talk) 22:13, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

 Fixed - Vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Article title

I see that the page "Breadwinners" redirects to "Breadwinners (TV series)." Shouldn't the article be renamed "Breadwinners" rather than "Breadwinners (TV series)" then? The note about other uses of the term Breadwinner should be kept. --Squiddaddy (talk) 01:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Series ended

Per instructions at Template:Infobox television#Parameters last_aired - need a reliable source from a reliable secondary source or one year since the last episode aired to mark the series as over. Private web pages and IMDb are not reliable sources. A news article or announcement from the network are what matters. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Adding category

Since it has been a year since the last episode ended, it is now considered silently cancelled. Someone has forgotten to add it to the category 2016 American television show endings, so someone with the ability to edit this page should add that in.96.240.131.237 (talk) 22:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

I don't know if we'll include it yet but let's see MechMaster Katzenstein (talk) 22:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

The co-producer is not the producer

Just to note that those are different job titles. The infobox producer attribute is for the person(s) with the producer job title who also actually acts as the producer for the series, the person in charge of production. Just as the executive producer attribute is for people who have the executive producer title. co-whatevers are assistants and somewhat minor crew credits that do not belong in the infobox. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:39, 21 October 2018 (UTC)