Talk:Rock Hill, South Carolina

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Rock Hill initially was it's own city and did not feed off of Charlotte, instead relying on a prolific textile industry.

Potential Collaborative Project

edit

I would love to talk with anyone interested in forming a Wikipedia collaborative project to polish, revise, and extend any and all articles related to York County, South Carolina. If you are interested, please contact me through my Talk Page. Cheers! --Chuchunezumi 06:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

WI-FI

edit

Information needs to be added to the new city wide WI-FI project. It is certainly notable a Rock Hill is one of the few cities in the us to have this. It is interesting that it is in a city this small relatively speaking. --Connor401 15:18, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

York Technical College

edit

Could you include York Technical College [1] in the education section ?.

File:Civita and Gateway.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Civita and Gateway.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Rock Hill City Hall.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Rock Hill City Hall.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?
Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Downtown Rock Hill sc exit.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Downtown Rock Hill sc exit.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Rock Hill Skyline.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Rock Hill Skyline.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notable natives and residents

edit

In most articles, if the people already have a Wikipedia article that has appropriate citations, the cites do not need to be duplicated here. The editors could decide to include only those people who already have articles. Generally, the name appears first, followed by the notability/ID material. It's useful to put the names in alphabetical order by surname - easier to look up people. Parkwells (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Weather, climate data

edit

I just reverted the edit by an anonymous IP that changed some of the weather data in the article. I have to question a few things: that the info is really reliable and that it may have been promotional or conflict of interest for the IP to add it. That whole table needs to probably be cleaned up as some of the info is unsourced. Putting down the weather channel in the edit summary as not being most reliable for local weather is specious at best. Their data is probably much better vetted since they have many certified meteorologists on staff. I'd trust TWC, NOAA or some State of SC sources. Possibly even local TV station meteorologists. A free-hosted website that possibly non-certified meteorologists could post to doesn't really seem as reliable as TWC. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copy of Rock Hill - Center for Innovation Testing and Evaluation

edit
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rock Hill, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Rock Hill, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Rock Hill, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Deleted items under 20th century

edit

Offered deletion of "Rock Hill has had repeated conflict with its neighbors" as that sentence does not represent fact, but editorial opinion.

Offered deletion of info related to landfill, as the state supreme court declined to rule on an appeal. http://www.heraldonline.com/news/local/article12292355.html

Offered deletion of info related to sludge application as the City stopped sludge application in 2013. http://www.wsacc.org/vertical/sites/%7B882A65C1-FD06-4D68-8923-A89C4735F466%7D/uploads/October_17_2013.pdf 22:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)katieb411 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katieb411 (talkcontribs)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rock Hill, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply