Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/New article announcements/March 2006

March 16-31, 2006 edit

Move to The Prayer of Russians? Brand 13:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Go right ahead. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 00:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Roslavl by Darwinek. Brand 20:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Muslim Magomayev, by me, upgraded from a stub to a full article. Grandmaster 19:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nikolai Bryukhanov, a biostub by me. KNewman 19:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Varteres Samourgachev by User:General Eisenhower
  • Soviet playground stub by me. Cmapm 17:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry, CTAPT, but this article is притянута за уши and высосана из пальца. I'd vote for its deletion. Unless I see an article on Bulgarian playgrounds or something like that :). And don't forget to take out the Soviet playground reference from the Playground article. KNewman 19:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Please vote. Cmapm 20:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • Actually, this article could be a part of a bigger article about Soviet urbanization and city-building policies. A certain number of playgrounds was mandatory for each microdistrict, just as there was supposed to be a certain number of shops/schools/kindergartens, as well as a дом быта, and a palace of culture covering a certain area. While the article just about a playground is viable, it is poorly titled (although I am having trouble coming up with a better title) and badly needs references (which as Cmapm indicated are hard to come by).—Ëzhiki (ërinacëus amurënsis) 20:09, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I admit, that generally it may be not important at all for most of other people, although it's important for me. I am not "the truth in the last instance". Actually, I'd compare it to hypothetic article about Soviet automats of aerated waters. :) But you should refer to community to ask/vote, whether it's important or not, not to me. Cmapm 20:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be an another siege in 1736, but I'm not sure. Brandmeister 02:37, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

March 1-15, 2006 edit

Shouldn't they all be with the -y at the end instead of the -iy? KNewman 14:50, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does it really matter? I prefer -iy. -y is used for -ый.--Kuban Cossack 16:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Probably should be just -y... Cf. Dolgoprudny, Pavlovsky -- Goudzovski 15:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article has been nominated for deletion.--Rockero 06:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]