Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 27

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 26 February 28 >

February 27 edit

Template:Chevalier of the National Order of the Legion of Honour edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All unused medal of honor templates that transclude just the image of the specific honor linking to the respective articles for it. These are unnecessary file and article transclusion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge all into Template:Medal Display/other, where these things properly go. (note: this is under reconstruction, there's a problem with South Africa and the entire world outside of the UK/US being lumped as one, as the South African subtemplate was merged with "world" at some point) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all per nom. Unused wrappers. Nigej (talk) 06:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bhopal Suburban Railway System edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused railway template with no mainspace for usage. Was created in article space before being moved to template space, but has no likely chance of being used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. We don't seem to have an article on the Bhopal Suburban Railway System. Nigej (talk) 07:28, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CIJM year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 12:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with no major edit or edits except for creation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cycling data La William edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused data templates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:55, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ExpandTemplates link edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved without redirect to User:Mathglot/sandbox/TemplatesExpandTemplates link with comment "Save for later." by Mathglot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused link to the special page for ExpandTemplates. Not sure what this template is going to do that's different from accessing the page through the Special pages link on the left side on Wikipedia. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to my sandbox area. If you're curious, it was to be expanded to allow inclusion of the text that goes in the main input box as a param, so it could be used as an example on Talk pages, and for certain kinds of tests destined for a Template testcases page which cannot use the standard templates and must use ExpandTemplates to test the use case. Anyway, moved. Mathglot (talk) 02:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2003 ISAF Sailing World Championships edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebars with no content to link to. Nigej (talk) 06:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Abortion methods edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused diagram already inline at Abortion#Methods. Nigej (talk) 07:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:American Samoa WGbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Polynesia/American Samoa work group related. Used in one talk page. the work group is inactive and there's no realistic prospect of further use. Nigej (talk) 07:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Antarctic English edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 12:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure whether this is a joke or not. Used in one talk page, related to the South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, which are a British Overseas Territory, so British English would surely do. Nigej (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely a joke. The sources I used in this article were so riddled with local terminology that I needed The Antarctic Dictionary: A Complete Guide to Antarctic English to understand them. The article in question, Rail transport in South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, did seem to have started as a joke with this edit, and it came to my attention with a proposed deletion. But after looking for sources I found that there was actually an article to write here. SpinningSpark 10:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arab Spring using EasyTimeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline for the Arab Spring. Unused in mainspace. Not a popular style nowadays and unlikely to be used. Nigej (talk) 07:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    •   Comment: Fine by me (as original creator), but best to check with @ERAGON:, who has put most work into it. Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 11:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Fine by me also; its old and no longer used.--ERAGON (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Area edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox for different orders of magnitude of areas. Half red links and the others all seem to redirect to Orders of magnitude (area), so it's useless for navigation. Nigej (talk) 08:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bad page for beginners edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used on Talk:COVID-19 pandemic but I'm not sure it's suitable. Is there any sort of policy/guideline/etc. for this concept. Nigej (talk) 08:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was created in response to the surge of newcomers trying to edit COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. I'm not sure it's needed there now, but there's a possibility it'll be suitable for some other page in the future, so I don't see reason to delete it. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 08:56, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's just that it seems to be a case of "Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia that Anyone Can Edit" but we don't want YOU editing this one. Nigej (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in mind that newcomers who see the template won't be seeing its name. The actual text of the template isn't framed as "don't edit this page"; rather, it's Welcome to Wikipedia; we're glad you're here! Please feel free to join discussions on this talk page, but be aware that this article is one of the more difficult places to jump in for newcomers. You may find it easier to help out with other tasks on Wikipedia. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the opposite of our editing philosophy and as per Wikipedia:Be bold and Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers.Moxy-  16:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree with comment above. I would like to thank Moxy for their articulate reply, whcih I totally agree with. --Sm8900 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    A friendly message is not a bite. And directing newcomers to types of editing where they are more likely to be contribute productively helps avoid bites. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 23:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete COVID-19 pandemic is extended-confirmed protected, so beginners can't edit it anyway and the template is pointless. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery, I've removed the template from the COVID-19 article; it should've been removed a while ago, as that article is different now than it was in 2020, when several editors praised it as exactly the right message for newcomers trying to jump into the chaos there. But it might still be helpful for other pages in the future, so the COVID-19 page is not an argument for deletion. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 23:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Then it should be deleted as unused. I find keeping templates based on unlikely speculation of the future to be counterproductive. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, we are supposed to be inclusive, not a clique of approved editors. This is sending entirely the wrong message. SpinningSpark 13:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. With all respect, this template has also been used in relation to items by experienced editors as well, and in a manner that simply argued against an item they had created. So I feel that diminishes the usefulness of this template somewhat in general as well, in my opinion. I feel this diminishes the openness of Wikipedia. --Sm8900 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On that basis, can we also please delete the related item Wikipedia:BADBEGINNER? This is simply a redirect, so its purpose is unclear; however, it seems to have a similar role. --Sm8900 (talk) 21:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. This is by no means a perfect template, but it has a particular use case. It's designed for talk pages of complex, major current events articles that have attracted a lot of newcomers who are ill-prepared to contribute to them productively. The editors above arguing that this is bitey fundamentally misunderstand the newcomer experience: the single most bitey common experience for a newcomer is the revert notification, and gently directing them elsewhere is the exact right approach if it helps avoid them getting reverted. It's no longer needed at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic, where it was used, but I do not see a compelling case above that we will never want to use it ever again elsewhere, or that it could not be adapted into something with a more helpful message. There is little downside to keeping it around, as it's not redundant to any other template, so I fall narrowly on the side of keeping it around. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 00:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to express my respect for your candor and your commitment to Wikipedia, in that you are voting in favor of a template that you originated, but you are being very open and forthright by voting "weak keep," rather than simply "keep." you have my respect for your consistent honesty and openness. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 02:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bold dark red edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Little-used template that was the subject of a TfD previously: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 12#Template:Bold dark red. Seems to fail accessibility ideas. Nigej (talk) 08:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only 3 current usages are used to convey information only through color which is against MOS:COLOR, as such all 3 usages should be removed. After that the template is left unused. Additionally, the color red is used on en.wiki to represent red links so while this might have a slightly different shade, this is still too close in color to be used with text. Gonnym (talk) 09:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no other "Bold ..." in Category:Text color templates so this seems non-standard and not really needed. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SMRT lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/SMRT. {{SMRT lines}} is only used in one old talk page. Gonnym (talk) 09:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chevrolet IndyCar engine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:15, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Little icons are commonly used for tyres (eg 2004 Formula One World Championship#Teams and drivers) but the idea of using them for engines never caught on. Nigej (talk) 09:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kuyper edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used in external links on many Dutch villages and towns. The external link points to maps from the 1860s with big watermarks even though it is clearly in the public domain. Of course an unmarked version is for sale at the site. There is literally no shortage of maps of Dutch villages and towns on Commons which do not watermarks. The external link and template are therefore obsolete, and I don't think it's wise to give this external site publicity. KittenKlub (talk) 10:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the template claims to be a reference template. If it's being used as a reference link in the external links section, those will need to be fixed. If it is being used in the references section, then deleting the template outright will remove the reference, creating a problem -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the transclusions, it is always in the external links section. There's also little purpose for it as a reference.KittenKlub (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Beer collaboration edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive collaboration since 2009. Gonnym (talk) 13:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BioCOTWnow edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:29, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive since 2009. Subst talk page usages of {{BioCOTWvoter}} and delete all. Gonnym (talk) 13:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brazilian Collaboration Notice edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive since at least 2009. Subst talk page usages of {{BC Reminder}} and delete all. Gonnym (talk) 13:09, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Location map/data/Indonesia Timor edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. ✗plicit 14:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Location map/data/Indonesia Timor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

Just redirect module. OktaRama2010 (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wrong venue, should be at RfD. One the merits, Speedy keep per WP:SK#1, since no argument for deletion has been provided. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

COVID-19 data by district in each Indian state edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tables of cases/recoveries/deaths/active cases by district in each state of India. All created by the one editor and nearly all edits by the same editor who abandoned the project in August 2021. Personally I'm not convinced that updating these is a useful exercise. If anything is every required at this level of detail (which seems unlikely to me), I don't think the content here would provide anything useful. Nigej (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Kerala medical cases edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to the above but by a different editor. Abandoned in 2020. Nigej (talk) 15:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Maharashtra medical cases edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charts of cases/recoveries/deaths. Abandoned in 2020. Nigej (talk) 15:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Conj edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template is pointless. If used to conjugate text in English, then it is redundant to Template:Separated entries, and the creator has still failed to establish a use case for conjugating text in other languages. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment {{conj}} is a horrid name. It looks like it should be for verb conjugation, considering it is linked to a module named "linguistic"; if this is kept, both module and templates need renaming, as the module seems to only make lists -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the "the creator has still failed to establish a use case for conjugating text in other languages", you didn't read the comment at the top of the module. It was just english. There was remaining non-english code that should be removed, as the comment said. The Linguistic, I put it in the same name to avoid confusion, and the seperated entries I didn't know existed. Delete it Anpang01 (talk) 01:06, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Nigej (talk) 06:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Russo-Ukrainian War edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Campaignbox Russo-Ukrainian War. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Russo-Ukrainian War with Template:Campaignbox Russo-Ukrainian War.
I propose merging Template:Russo-Ukrainian War with Template:Campaignbox Russo-Ukrainian War. The two have the same titles but use different sidebars (Campaignbox for "Template:Campaignbox Russo-Ukrainian War" and Sidebar with collapsible lists for "Template:Russo-Ukrainian War"). I think a Campaignbox is better suited for a conflict like this. I also counted eight overlapping links between the two. lol1VNIO (Talk • Contrib) 17:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge to Template:Campaignbox Russo-Ukrainian War. One of these should not be a sidebar, but instead be a navbox, per the usual naming practices -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 22:50, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge the colored one into the campaignbox. Otherwise, leave the campaignbox as is. Curbon7 (talk) 23:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft Keep/Rename (or Rewrite) as the Impact of the Russo-Ukrainian War for the sidebar version. While I'm somewhat agreeing with you, if they don't have any civilian topics, before proposing to merged. But they do, as the sidebar version does has some civilian topics that won't clash well for the Campaignbox version. As, it tells the impact within Ukraine prior to the invasion by Putin's Russian Federation, since days ago. Through only the military-related topics can moved/merged to the Campaignbox version, while keep the sidebar for the civilian impact-related topics. Chad The Goatman (talk) 00:50, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nomination. Don't change the name. Just let it be called Campaignbox Russo-Ukrainian War and articles about the impact of the conflict can be added with a section of its own. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nom. --WellThisIsTheReaper 01:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge merge 'Template:Russo-Ukrainian War' into 'Template:Campaignbox Russo-Ukrainian War' template. Chongkian (talk) 08:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to campaignbox per nomination. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 08:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Air Medal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template relating to the Air Medal. Nigej (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Autism edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navboxes superseded by {{Pervasive developmental disorders}} and {{Autism resources}}. Nigej (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ayoub Amer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A memorial biography. No article or red links to one. Creator's edits were on this page. Suggest deletion. Nigej (talk) 18:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BC Khimki current roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused roster for a Russian basketball team. At least 3 of the 4 players mentioned no longer play for the team. See also BC Khimki#Current roster which only has 1 player not noted here. Nigej (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only if articles exist for them. Because if not then there is no need to keep the template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. No useful content. Nigej (talk) 06:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BPL Result edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template relating to the Bangladesh Premier League (Cricket). Nigej (talk) 19:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BVBQ2020OG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Table of qualifying teams, already inline at Beach volleyball at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's qualification and Beach volleyball at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Women's qualification Nigej (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:B class destroyer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 March 8. Primefac (talk) 15:09, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jews and Judaism category tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 15:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used on over a thousand talk pages, mostly category talk pages, this is being used on the wrong spaces and takes up a majority of the space on the pages it's used on. There is no useful navigation this template provides and is very intrusive. Ironically enough, it's transcluded on its own template talk page which makes it pointless. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's better to navigate through category space. You're gonna have to provide evidence that this has been useful aside from the fact that you created it. And you're the only one who has been adding this template to the various category talk pages. What is there to improve? Let the categories be there without a need for a template. And you're invoking of Not Paper isn't relevant as this template does take up unnecessary space on the talk pages. It's very obtrusive. You call it a navigational template and yet it's not per Wikipedia:Navigation template. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiCleanerMan: That I created the navigational template is not some kind of "crime" since I am trying to help users who are not familair with this vast subjecty matter. You are the first one to complain in the more than eleven years since I created it [1]. Let me ask you a question, did you just happen to bump into this category tree and decided you hate it, or have you really been trying to get into the complicated categories of Category:Jews & Category: Judaism & Category:Jewish history that have so many overlapping and confusing sub and sub, sub categories that makes navigating them very confusing? Seems to me you are just doing a hatchet job based on WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT which is no excuse at all to start this deletion discussion. And yes, WP:NOTPAPER does apply. Kindly withdraw your nomination please! Thanks, IZAK (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on the template. Keep your PA's to yourself. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. and reformat. It would be trivial to condense the space that it occupies, and its not necessary to use color. DGG ( talk ) 01:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless a new style is actually helpful. The current setup offers really no assistance in any way. It just lists the parent categories, which a user can see by clicking on the parent categories. I truly doubt that anything here can be useful as we don't use this can of "help" system for any other subject, and I doubt this specific topic is the most complicated subject to exist. Gonnym (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a helpful navigation guide through the category structure related to the topic and one that I've used multiple times over the years. Alansohn (talk) 08:16, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is a helpful tool, used only on talk pages. Needs some formatting so the squares and texts will be distributed evenly. gidonb (talk) 12:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Baku raions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox, now superseded by {{Baku}} which has a line Districts of Baku. Nigej (talk) 20:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FlagRGF edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused that only transcludes [[File:RGF team flag (2021 WCh).svg]]. This image is already being used across dozens of articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Banff class sloop edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Navbox superseded by {{Lake class cutters}}. Nigej (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bestof7 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:10, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace, template for displaying scores in a best-of-7 event. Only usage is User:Jonpin/Stanley#Automaticizer from 2007. Nigej (talk) 20:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Before-after DST edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Time-related template that automatically changes text about DST depending on the time of year. Been around 10 years and no ones using it. Probably no real requirement. Nigej (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Before hour edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Time-related template from 2006 that lets you produce different text depending on the time of day. No obvious use in an encyclopedia. Nigej (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Borino edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:04, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox for a Bulgarian Municipality but only 1 article Borino. Nigej (talk) 21:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Communalism sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet the WP:SIDEBAR criteria. The articles largely do not refer to each other, apart from their general connection with Murray Bookchin (whose navbox is already sufficient for that purpose). czar 23:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It may seem to be of somewhat lesser importance, but considering that Wikipedia has entries on (almost) every tv sitcom, every major music recording, every video game, every train, every car, and every airplane ever sold commercially.... this template does seem to meet a basic standard of usefulness, to be retained. --Sm8900 (talk) 20:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. As noted the key articles are more related to Murray Bookchin and we already have a Navbox {{Murray Bookchin}}. Other articles like Institute for Social Ecology don't mention Communalism. The other issue is that the area is overloaded with sidebars. Murray Bookchin already has three, indicating that we need consolidation in this area, not more similar ones. Nigej (talk) 10:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hindu festival date (English) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Template:Hindu festival date. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete If there is a requirement for this feature it should be added as an option to the template noted. No need for two templates. Nigej (talk) 06:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IPT Aeronaves edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and only two links. Fails navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not enough links to be useful. Nigej (talk) 06:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LACMTA Platform Layout L Line Elevated edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No major edit except for creation. Not sure where this could be used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_27&oldid=1075952412"