Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 13

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 12 February 14 >

February 13 edit

Template:M-Line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep and {{McKinney Avenue Transit Authority}} to {{M-Line}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused; superseded by {{McKinney Avenue Transit Authority}}. Mackensen (talk) 13:14, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rao Balaji Rathore edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Primefac (talk) 15:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article draft incorrectly created as a template GoingBatty (talk) 06:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kaptan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Scottywong (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article draft incorrectly created as a template - see also Template:Rao Balaji Rathore GoingBatty (talk) 06:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jalore1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Scottywong (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article draft incorrectly created as a template - see also Template:Rao Balaji Rathore GoingBatty (talk) 06:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GoingBatty: I have moved Template:Rao Balaji Rathore to Draft:Rao Balaji Rathore for now, since its not ready for mainspace yet. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Victor Schmidt: Very kind of you. The redirect Template:Rao Balaji Rathore can be deleted without deleting the draft. GoingBatty (talk) 06:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Its my standard behavor when I find article drafts in namespaces where they don't belong and they're evidently not ready for article space yet. Victor Schmidt (talk) 06:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boca Juniors squad/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 13:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doc page for {{Boca Juniors squad}}. However that template doesn't use it, the "format=" feature having been removed in 2017, making it a simple navbox Nigej (talk) 06:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Docs were removed from the template page in error. I have removed the defunct |format= information. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per User:Jonesey95. Debresser (talk) 21:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/India/Tamil Nadu medical cases by district/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:54, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parents have been WP:BLARed and these templates blanked. Nigej (talk) 06:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per the history of each template, each one is "unused and time-sensitive data outdated" since September 2020 (India/Tamil Nadu medical), August 2020 (Nepal PCR), and May 2021 (Nepal medical). It is unlikely that they will be updated and used again. I blanked the templates on Feb 9th and their related doc pages to see if any users request unblanking before proceeding with a delete request. So far there have been no unblanking requests. Jroberson108 (talk) 06:54, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Templates have been unblanked so editors can more easily view their content when deciding if they should be deleted. Jroberson108 (talk) 06:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete docs and parent templates; templates unlikely to be updated or used. Jroberson108 (talk) 09:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete parent templates and sub-pages as unused. Gonnym (talk) 09:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SJFA West Premier League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Scottish football related navboxes noted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 11#Template:SJFA Ayrshire District League. Nigej (talk) 07:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Saraburi F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused squad template from 2015. Club was dissolved and restarted at a very low level. We don't seem to have any articles for the current squad. May eventually get back to a higher level but currently seems best to delete. Nigej (talk) 07:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 11:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 11:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If unused, delete per nom. Govvy (talk) 14:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete none of the current squad are notable (as they play in a lower league than when template was created), so template would not have enough valid redlinks. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Savage Avengers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. There's a vast number of navboxes in this area and others are being used. Nigej (talk) 07:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Olympic Champions Bobsleigh Women's Monobob edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unused and unnecessary Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 08:04, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete First one in 2022. Won't be useful for navigation until about 2032. Nigej (talk) 08:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Templates for other 1st time events at 2022 Winter Olympics have been created:Mixed Ski Jump, Mixed relay short track, Mixed snowboard cross, mixed aerials. 2018 Winter Olympics also added 1st time events: mixed curling and alpine tema event.Tomrtn (talk) 13:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You're just listing other navboxes that need deleting too. See WP:NAVBOX which says a navbox is "a grouping of links used in multiple related articles to facilitate navigation between those articles in Wikipedia." So many of these are being used for decorative purposes. If they don't "facilitate navigation between those articles in Wikipedia" they should be deleted. Nigej (talk) 14:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about combining this with the other bobsleigh events like in snowboarding?Tomrtn (talk) 15:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and delete all others for first time events with one winner too. Templates are for navigation, there's no need if there's only 1 winner listed. The keep vote above is just WP:OSE. (Some other events have multiple winners, as they're team events, so should be discussed separately). Joseph2302 (talk) 13:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Screen Actors Guild Awards Ensemble TV Comedy 1994–1999 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:ScreenActorsGuildAwards EnsembleTVComedy. ✗plicit 13:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive detail. Covered by {{ScreenActorsGuildAwards EnsembleTVComedy}} which is a sort of composite of these. Listing entire casts in this sort of navbox is never going to work in the long run. Suggest merge to {{ScreenActorsGuildAwards EnsembleTVComedy}} with cast members removed. See eg {{ScreenActorsGuildAward CastMotionPicture}}. Nigej (talk) 08:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ScreenActorsGuildAwards EnsembleTVDrama 1994–1999 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:ScreenActorsGuildAwards EnsembleTVDrama. ✗plicit 13:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive detail. Covered by {{ScreenActorsGuildAwards EnsembleTVDrama}} which is a sort of composite of these. Listing entire casts in this sort of navbox is never going to work in the long run. Suggest merge to {{ScreenActorsGuildAwards EnsembleTVDrama}} with cast members removed. See eg {{ScreenActorsGuildAward CastMotionPicture}}. Nigej (talk) 08:53, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tranz Metro color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Tranz Metro. Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tranz Scenic color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/KiwiRail Scenic. Gonnym (talk) 09:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MTs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary station link wrapper. Gonnym (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SLML edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary station link wrapper. Gonnym (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SpeedwayTeam edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused speedway related templates from 2008/2009. Nigej (talk) 09:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UNTV Cup color cell edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sports color templates. Gonnym (talk) 09:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Speedway annual team templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Annual speedway team navboxes mostly from 2007 and 2008. Generally these are unsuitable for navboxes. While navboxes for "current" squads/teams are quite common, annual ones are not, except for exceptional cases, like winning the world cup. Also, although we have team articles but we don't have annual articles for the teams, so there's no content. Nigej (talk) 10:06, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. I think I only created one of these, which was the one for Leicester Lions in 2011, which was a significant season as it saw the return of the team after a 28 year absence. It doesn't really add anything that isn't already in the article on the team though, so I'm not really bothered if it gets deleted. I would have thought the same would apply to the others. --Michig (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rndpad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:51, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than a few old talk pages. Template:Round can and should handle any rounding when needed. Gonnym (talk) 10:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Philosophy of education sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:54, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The contents of this template has been merged into Template:Philosophy of education. There is no need to have two duplicates. As this one is labelled "... sidebar" (unnecessary) and not maintained by the WikiProject Philosophy, I propose that this is deleted. Sda030 (talk) 11:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Request stops in the United Kingdom edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A list of railway request stops in the UK. We don't seem to have an article on the topic. Fails WP:NAVBOX since the stops are basically unconnected. Basically this is an article List of request stops in the United Kingdom in the form of a navbox. Nigej (talk) 11:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rugby union positions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox showing Rugby union positions. Actually all the links go to the main article, so fails the navigational aspect of a navbox. Nigej (talk) 11:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per nom, this would be better as an image, and I wouldn't be surprised if one already existed. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Algol strict edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against userfication if page creator requests. Primefac (talk) 09:16, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a user sandbox in the wrong place. The main content is now at ALGOL 68#Program representation. Nigej (talk) 12:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The template was originally used to highlight Algol68 code samples and was used on 3 Wikipedia pages, so originally it wasn't just a sandbox. NevilleDNZ (talk) 07:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • As yet the standard <syntaxhighlight> extension (formerly known as SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi) does not otherwise support Algol 68's formal stropping. The similar 'syntax-highlight' effect was simply achieved in MediaWiki by using that template that imports an Algol_strict Cascading Style Sheet.
I cannot see another way of effecting 'syntax-highlight' stropping without using that template.
The alternative will be to get Algol68 support added to <syntaxhighlight> SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi , but that is unlikely to happen anytime soon.
In the mean time, I could update the "help" information on two particular pages https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SyntaxHighlight and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Algol_strict/styles.css, that may help. The 'help' on Algol_strict/styles.css seems to be particularly stark.
Similarly I could do a review of all the existing pages with actual Algol68 code samples, and reintroduce the Template:Algol strict: ... there are about 10 pages needing it. NevilleDNZ (talk) 07:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The proper way to add this, is at [1], [2], [3] and [4], and not manually add this to articles. Gonnym (talk) 06:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or move to userspace per above. We don't need the same boilerplate in 10 different articles. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ancestors of John Gielgud edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 21. Primefac (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Popular Democratic Party (Puerto Rico) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox of the List of presidents of the Popular Democratic Party of Puerto Rico. Was Tfded here Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 1#Template:Popular Democratic Party (Puerto Rico) but still an unused and now out-of-date. Nigej (talk) 12:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Olympic Champions In Mixed Ski jumping edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NAVBOX, this template only has one set of links and does not facilitate navigation between articles. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Olympic Champions in Mixed team snowboard cross edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NAVBOX, this template only has one set of links and does not facilitate navigation between articles. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Footer Olympic Champions 2000m Relay Short Track Speed Skating Mixed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NAVBOX, this template only has one set of links and does not facilitate navigation between articles. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I created it because I saw that all Olympic events had similar templates. For example (all Summer Olympics):
Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x100 m Medley Relay Mixed
Template:Footer Olympic Champions Men K-4 500 m
Template:Footer Olympic Champions Women C-1 Slalom
Category:Skateboarding Olympic champions navigational boxes (4 templates)
Template:Footer Olympic Champions 4x100 m Medley Relay Mixed
Template:Footer Olympic Champions Triathlon Mixed relay
Seven articles use this template. It can also be used to navigate between team members.
Fox example the Template:Footer Olympic Champions Curling Mixed template was created in 2018, no one bothered that it existed with similar content for about 4 years. I think there's no problem with the existence of these templates, and I could care less about the Navbox rules. The template will probably be recreated in 2026, when next event will finished (99% that this event will included in the next Winter Olympics). Tomcsy (talk) 00:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I agree.Tomrtn (talk) 01:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I agree, and it has also 6 interwikilinks to other wiki-languages. --Migrant (talk – contribs) 04:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Volleyball in Estonia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no transclusions and no main article. Delete or userfy until an article is ready. Category:Volleyball in Estonia links the relevant articles together for now. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. There's almost enough links but the lack of a parent article is a big downside, since it's only that article that would show that the other articles are truly "related". Nigej (talk) 17:03, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Just added the template to the relevant articles. I don't understand why didn't you do it yourself, rather than start a deletion discussion? See all similar templates [5]. Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The trouble is that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (in Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions) is just as much an argument for deleting all the others. Nigej (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I would have done so except that the navbox fails WP:NAVBOX items 4 and 5 at a minimum. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You don't understand why another editor didn't add the template instead of starting this discussion? Well, you could ask yourself why you, the creator, didn't bother doing so until now, almost two years after you created it. Gonnym (talk) 09:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Probably forgot. It has 7 links, which should be enough. Pelmeen10 (talk) 23:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Welcomeen-es/doc and similar doc pages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The parent templates of these doc pages have all been modified to use the centralized {{Welcome-foreign/doc}}, which works well. The dedicated /doc subpages are no longer needed or usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tennis kit edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. Only edits were creation in 2017. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Testosterone metabolism edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is just a file wrapped in a navbox wrapper. {{Testosterone metabolism mini}} appears to get the job done in relevant articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Axolotls edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G8 by Slon02 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. This is a WikiProject template for a WikiProject that does not appear to exist. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject G-Unit Records edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, does not appear to be usable. This is a WikiProject template for a WikiProject that appears to have been merged in 2011. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject G-Unit Records. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/RB-NRW left/35 and related rail templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Presumably replaced by Module:Adjacent stations. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gendered fooers from Northern Ireland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Given this template creator's active and productive work with categorization and related templates, I'm guessing that this template's function was somehow incorporated into {{Fooers from Northern Ireland}}, as shown at Category:Female field hockey players from Northern Ireland. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indian reserves in Alberta edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Seems surplus to {{First Nations in Alberta}}. Nigej (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indian art history edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar. Most of the links are simply sections of Indian Art. {{Indian art}} seems a better way forward, covering a broader range of topics. Nigej (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox album/No cover edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Until 9 March 2008 there was an option in {{Infobox album}} to upload the album cover. However this option was removed with the comment "As noted before, there cannot be a default "No cover" image, because of pages where the copyright holder has requested the removal of the image, etc., the upload of which we cannot encourage", so the use of this template was removed. Nigej (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox broadcasting network convert edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to Template:Infobox broadcasting network/convert Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused wrapper for {{Infobox television channel}}. Nigej (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I use this for conversion of appropriate pages. It's designed to be substed, so it'll never have transclusions. My end goal is to get rid of Infobox broadcasting network altogether, which I've been chipping away at. Not every use of it should be converted to Infobox television channel...some are quite peculiar. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:09, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to {{Infobox broadcasting network/convert}} to make it clear that this is a subpage that can be removed once the template conversions are completed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move per Jonesey95. Better to keep related templates together. Gonnym (talk) 07:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Slavic microlanguages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Surplus to {{Slavic languages}} which has a section "Microlanguages" Nigej (talk) 19:07, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Somalilander clans edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Seems to be a subset of {{Somali clans}}. Nigej (talk) 19:11, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Apple hardware between 1998 and 2020 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused templates surplus to {{Apple hardware since 1998}}. I'm assuming there's no consensus to split. Nigej (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Unnecessary extra template already covered by the one mentioned in the nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC Nyva Ternopil Squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{FC Nyva Ternopil squad}} (small s). Nigej (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The same editor created both templates on the same day. This appears to happen because editors don't know that they can move pages instead of recreating them. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 11:16, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 11:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FIDE Grand Swiss series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of {{FIDE Grand Swiss Tournament}}. Nigej (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Japanese House of Representatives election maps edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and fails the purpose of a template linking to images of election maps instead of articles. No navigational benefit here. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Navboxes are specifically for navigating between articles. {{Japanese elections}} covers this area. Nigej (talk) 22:04, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the original author of the template I wouldn’t mind. I think getting rid of the template would be a good idea.—沁水湾 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 22:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sheikh Hasina sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 21. Primefac (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_13&oldid=1073164784"