Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 11

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 10 February 12 >

February 11 edit

edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blank since 2012, no transclusions or documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SG/PLDP edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:12, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content is just a wikilink that is transcluded on only one page. Recommend subst and delete. An ambitious person might take a look at Special:PrefixIndex/Template:SG/ to see how many pages in that list are used in only one or two pages to show a link and/or a logo. At minimum, the templates could be merged into a single template with parameters for the party name and the logo, like {{Rugby union team}}. It does not make sense to have dozens of templates to perform a single function. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems that MOS:ICON, specially MOS:TOOMANY and MOS:DECORATION, would be against the use of these icons as they are currently used. And any political party name should be added to Module:Political party. Gonnym (talk) 09:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Explosive Dog edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Silly template, image is a copyright violation. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 03:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment not only that but something's screwy with the formatting causing everything under it to become centered (I know because the user who made it decided to test it on my talk page for whatever reason). ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 04:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Lately, it seems that some new editors think by tagging a page with a "Humor" template, they can get away with junky pages. Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete we don't need 100 increasingly-silly variations of {{trout}}. Elli (talk | contribs) 04:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per Elli I fail to see the use of ever escalating versions of {{trout}}. -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 06:07, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per recent discussion on {{Db-g0}}. Like many things on Wikipedia, they've got a habit of spreading. Nigej (talk) 06:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Exactly what Liz said. The {{Humor}} tag is seriously being misused. Gonnym (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no humorous and not useful Whpq (talk) 12:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per liz ― Levi_OPTalk 15:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Elli. The wet trout thing was always stupid but now we’re just getting into reducto ad absurdum. Dronebogus (talk) 01:47, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the above. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, harmless but we don't need any more trout variants. Stifle (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Things like this just antagonise people and don't serve any useful purpose to balance this out. Neiltonks (talk) 12:30, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Campaignbox Anastasian War edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Little used and not very informative template. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this template when I was removing deleted articles from the template, leaving only 2 pages mentioned. Liz Read! Talk! 06:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BardSoderqvist2002 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template is currently unused since I removed and replaced the only two occurrences. Having it added back anywhere would be detrimental to Wikipedia. It's intended to be used as a citation, but it ignores all the conventions of citations, combining two {{cite}}s and additional text. Furthermore, all of the (many) links are bad (dead, barely related, or duplicate, including the ISBN, which is incorrect). Lest anyone be misled by the template's active change history, all of the changes (since 2010) are changes to syntax only. Dan Bloch (talk) 06:22, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OverdoneStinkBomb edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary "humor" template. We don't need to have more ways for users to repetitively slap each other, and the existence of templates like this encourages such behavior. This hasn't gotten a significant amount of usage either (thankfully), so it's not like it will be missed. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:31, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Too much already. Nigej (talk) 07:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. A talk page message to the deserving editor should suffice and we already have multiple warning templates to address specific issues.Blue Riband► 03:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Since everyone’s got their own dumb trouting template these days:

BLORNK!

You've been BLORNKNOMINATED FOR BLORNKDELETION
you’ve been for doing something REALLY SILLY blornk lololol (not) you’ve been for doing something REALLY SILLY blornk lololol (not)

Dronebogus (talk) 01:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Enough now. Stifle (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. As per "explosive dog" above, things like this just antagonise people and don't serve any useful purpose to balance this out. Neiltonks (talk) 12:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Elephant edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary "humor" template that doesn't fulfill a need or improve collaboration. We don't need more ways for users to slap each other (or stomp on each other, I guess). Elli (talk | contribs) 06:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 07:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or G7 Userfy or delete as the creator and per Gonnym. This sounds pretty weird, but it was for humorous purposes only and I would have expected it to be deleted at some point. Thanks. It’s probably not suitable for the Template namespace, but you can always userfy it to my own userspace. Move it to User:3PPYB6/Templates/Elephant and suppress the redirect. Thank you. If you think userfying is not suitable, you can always delete the template. In light of the recent arguments, feel free to delete the template. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 13:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: I didn’t tag it for G7, since others might have different opinions. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 16:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Userfying a template that can then be used on other users' pages is not a proper solution. If it can be used on other users' pages, then it's still a public template. Template:Trout is available for that. Gonnym (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uw-nonazis/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Parent page was merged soon after its creation into {{Uw-derogatory}}, which uses a centralized documentation page, so there is no redirect target for this page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:58, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Clearly no need for a doc page for a non-existent template. Nigej (talk) 07:19, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This can be G8 (which I typically use) or G6. Gonnym (talk) 09:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:InuktitutCree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template from 2009 relating to Canadian Aboriginal syllabics. Adds a banner and adds the articles to four subcategories of Category:Canadian Aboriginal syllabics which are all empty and probably have been since 2009. Nigej (talk) 07:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IsLCOTW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Templates related to the short lived "Literature Collaboration of the Week" from 2005. Nigej (talk) 07:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Locations of the 2014 Finnish Championships teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first is a map of the team locations in the 2014 Finnish Championship League (rugby union). Could be added there. The second is an unfinished league table for the 2014 Finnish Championship League. Both created in 2014. Since this is the only season covered, another option would be to WP:BLAR the article to Finnish Championship League and delete both. Nigej (talk) 07:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both Not sure either of these are needed, the Finnish league is a non-notable league anyway. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lost to-do edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused to-do list for the inactive WP:LOST. Unchanged since 2016. No prospect of use. Best cleared out. Nigej (talk) 08:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:National Capital Territory of Delhi edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of Template:Delhi and above contains items which are already present in this one. Sandeep kumar 83j (talk) 13:53, 11 February 2022 (IST)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major estrogens marketed for clinical or veterinary use edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was used at Estrogen (medication)#Available forms but was copied there in September 2020‎ and has been trimmed down since then. Nigej (talk) 08:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Major androgens/anabolic steroids marketed for clinical or veterinary use edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was used at Anabolic steroid#Available forms but was copied there in September 2020‎ and has been trimmed down since then. Nigej (talk) 08:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mc6847 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and covered at Motorola 6847#Video modes, although the content is somewhat different. Nigej (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Whatever the "good" information is should be handled as regular edits by those editing that page. Gonnym (talk) 09:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Media in the Democratic Republic of the Congo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:43, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. We have a parent article and a handful of links. Was added to these articles but removed with the comment "template (generates red categories)" Nigej (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Megalopolises of China edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and perhaps unfinished since Megalopolises in China has a longer list. Could perhaps be expanded into something usable if anyone is interested, but as it is it's not useful. Nigej (talk) 09:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Members of the United States of Indonesia legislatives edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox relating to the short-lived United States of Indonesia (1949-1950). Much better covered by {{USI}} and the red links can be added there should articles ever be written. Nigej (talk) 09:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Universe Slovenia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the yearly articles were WP:BLARed in October 2021 and as a result this template is of no use. Nigej (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss World Continental Queen of Beauty titleholders footer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. All the individual years were deleted here: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Miss World Continental Queen of Beauty titleholders templates and 2019 previously, so this is no longer useful even if it was used. Nigej (talk) 09:24, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss World Continental Queen of Beauty titleholders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This award is the highest placed in Miss World for each continent. All the content on this has been WP:BLARed to Miss World so there's no actual content now on this. Nigej (talk) 09:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to comment: The navigation is between the winners and not the award article. So regardless of the fact that Miss World Africa was redirected, the title holders are still title holders. Gonnym (talk) 09:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's some implication from the BLAR that this is something of a made-up award, at least for some years, so it's not entirely obvious that they are title holders, especially since we have so little content and no references. Nigej (talk) 10:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If that is true, that is a completely different story. Gonnym (talk) 11:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mountain West Conference navbox/style edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Presumably Module:College color is used instead. Nigej (talk) 09:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NFL GM footer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused footer. These were intended to be used at {{Los Angeles Rams general manager navbox}} etc. The similar {{NFL staff footer}} is used. Nigej (talk) 09:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coordinator edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to this discussion Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 15#Template:WikiProject Manager where a similar template was deleted. Mainly used in user talk pages for those who received the "WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter: November 2016" Nigej (talk) 10:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per reasons for deletion for the above template. Usage is deprecated and future use is not likely. asoundd 15:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Self-harm edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary per WP:NODISCLAIMERS (which doesn't explicitly apply to talkpages, but a common sense interpretation says we don't need content disclaimers on talkpages any more than in articles). This doesn't help collaboration and contributes to banner blindness. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: I created this template for talk pages that commonly attract threats of self-harm and suicide. Per WP:SUICIDE, these are the resources and guidance we offer in response to such threats. I don't think it conflicts with WP:NODISCLAIMERS now that I have shortened it. If it does, I'd seriously invoke IAR, as the potential good this can do is greater than the potential harm caused by banner blindness. ––FormalDude talk 06:25, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • I still dispute that the edited version is at all helpful. It reads as patronizing and disrespectful to me, and I don't think there is a way to word this template that wouldn't, given that the goal of this is to convince someone of something. I think we should stick to the facts: we can describe in our articles how self-harm is damaging, how suicide is devastating how and most people who survive suicide regret attempting, etc; but when we talk down to our readers like this it lowers our credibility, and I doubt it actually helps to save lives. People who are undergoing a mental health crisis deserve access to accurate, non-judgemental, and non-biased information. Providing that is a far greater service to them than this banner. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • The goal of this is to comply with what is already determined by the community to be the appropriate response to threats of physical harm. It is not persuasive or argumentative, it is merely informative. And we are, after all, an informative service. ––FormalDude talk 22:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Who would ever use it and why? We're a bunch of amateurs and providing any sort of mental health advice is not really acceptable IMO. Nigej (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I would say that those who are considering harming themselves might use it so as to not harm themselves in the end. As for the rest, the template currently links directly to a page maintained by The Wikimedia Foundation Trust & Safety team and the content of that page is for hotlines and other resources, which I think is acceptable. As far as I can tell, the template isn't giving mental health advice, but giving people resources to get themselves help. --Super Goku V (talk) 04:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moving people toward resources they're looking for that are available elsewhere in the Wikimedia ecosystem is, generally, a good thing. Casting the impersonal imaginary voice of talkpage message boxes as a crisis counselor is not. I think the revised wording is a step in the right direction here, but it's still a bit too pointed. I would support keeping this with wording like The Wikimedia Foundation's Trust and Safety team maintains a list of crisis support resources. Simple, to-the-point, not assuming anything about the reader. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it's a talk page template, there are a bunch of disclaimers for talk pages. {{talk header}} contains disclaimers. The reworded template of Feb 2 is definitely much better than the one from Feb 1. WP:NOMEDICALADVICE is certainly something that should be kept in mind when writing anything, because of legal requirements of an entity based in the United States. Indeed, it may be a good idea to link to the general Wikipedia medical disclaimer in this temmplate. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per banner blindness. Attempting to assess whether someone will or won't use it probably falls in the "you as nameless anonymous person are not sufficiently smart about these topics to know", so probably should get tossed out by the closing admin. --Izno (talk) 18:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks to be leaning delete, likely needs more input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 10:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Just want to note for the record that this is not the first time a template like this has been deleted, see 2006 and 2017 discussions on similar issues. I was originally going to close this as delete citing those discussions, but upon re-reading the discussion is close enough to merit at least one relist. Primefac (talk) 10:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Its easy to say delete, because who is depressed and browsing Wikipedia talk pages? But then I remembered that is exactly what I do... The template has utility and so should be kept. //Lollipoplollipoplollipop::talk 02:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep with revised wording I agree with efforts to improve the wording. I also believe templates like these are beneficial and have utility, so in my opinion I'd keep it. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 07:16, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multiplanetary systems list/Middle edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. {{Multiplanetary systems list}}, {{Multiplanetary systems list/Top}} and {{Multiplanetary systems list/Bottom}} are used but not this one (which is presumably for adding an extra line of headings in the middle). Style has changed since it was last edited so would probably be easier to recreate from scratch. Nigej (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment these are written using HTML table tags, is there a reason this shouldn't use wikitable coding? -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 06:42, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pashto IPA chart vowels with audio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to Pashto phonology. Seems to an abandoned attempt from 2016 to create this chart with audio. Nigej (talk) 14:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Philosophy image of the week edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:27, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to the defunct "Philosophy portal image of the week". Seems we're in week 6 but there's no image. Won't ever be used again. Nigej (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pichilemu City Council members by term header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Part of a grand scheme to display the Pichilemu City Council members from 1894. The categories that were created were deleted: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 January 1#Category:Pichilemu City Council members, 1894–1897 and this template was left over. Nigej (talk) 14:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Political Territorial Division of Caracas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfinished attempt to make a clickable map of the divisions of Caracas. es:Caracas#Área Metropolitana has something better if it's ever needed. Nigej (talk) 14:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Politics of Kashmir edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar, perhaps unfinished. Seems pretty thin when compared to {{Regions and administrative territories of Kashmir}} which the same editor created. Nigej (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Political leaders of the European Parliament edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table giving the Political Group Leaders of the European Parliament, but not updated since 2007. Nigej (talk) 15:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Post-Reformation Roman Catholic archbishops of Tuam edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox, a duplicate of {{Roman Catholic archbishops of Tuam}} Nigej (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Republican People's Party Conferences edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox, a duplicate of the earlier {{Conventions of the Republican People's Party}}. Nigej (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SC East Bengal first match team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused picture. Was used in the history section of SC East Bengal but later removed. Confusingly the article refers to this as a "seven-a-side tournament" Nigej (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. S.A. Julio (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 21:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: As per nom. When I made this, I was unaware of the guidelines and polices.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  14:54, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SHL teams edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused article content now inline at 2020–21 SHL season#Teams (Swedish ice hockey) Nigej (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SJFA Ayrshire District League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navboxes relating to Scottish football. The leagues were reorganised in 2018: Scottish Junior Football Association, West Region#Roll of Honour, marking an end to these leagues. Nigej (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SJFA West Premier League and Template:West of Scotland Super League (referring to the defunct SJFA West, not the current WOS) could also be deleted, I have moved the season articles to the general Template:SJFA West Region. Crowsus (talk) 20:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SK RMs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. {{Subdivisions of Saskatchewan}} is preferred. Not really room for both. Nigej (talk) 17:35, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Playstation.com edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Little-used (only 3 articles) template that is busted: all links redirect to the playstation.com homepage. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete For an external link template 3 is a very small number. Not worth having. Nigej (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SK Slavia Praha departments edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar with the "Departments of Slavia Prague" in the form of pictograms. Covered by a navbox {{SK Slavia Prague}} which it not so domineering. Nigej (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Santa Maria, Bulacan Census edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:33, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template to produce a population table, replaced at Santa Maria, Bulacan by {{Philippine Census}} and {{Philippine census population}}. Nigej (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_11&oldid=1072681363"