Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 11

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 10 February 12 >

February 11 edit

Template:England conurbations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 19. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ontlaseating edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete it. Kevinhanit (talk) 17:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Steel1943, If you delete it, then what would you substitute it with? Kevinhanit (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Kevinhanit: Please see this edit for how "substitution" works. What I mean is that I don't see a need for this content to be in the "Template:" namespace since it is used in only one article. So, with "substitution, the code of the template would be placed in the article instead of the transclusion of {{Ontlaseating}}. Steel1943 (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks for the update. It is a transferable template that goes with the article of the Current Ontario Legislature. It makes it much easier to read the article while updating it as this section is extremely long when edited. Kevinhanit (talk) 18:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This template is ugly to look and and difficult to read even on a computer, let alone a phone. That said it's better off as a template as it would make editing the article very difficult. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete The markup stored here is no more complicated than any other article with a wikitable directly in the wikitext, of which there are many, so this is just like any other single-use template. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 01:52, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete Seems to me that this is much too detailed stuff for Wikipedia. Substitute back in and then there can be a discussion there as to whether this is needed or not. Either way, it shouldn't be a template. Nigej (talk) 09:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PIE-OInd-Av edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:57, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep seems to serve a useful purpose being separate from the article, making editing easier --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:39th Canadian Parliament standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This one should be substituted and deleted Kevinhanit (talk) 00:51, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 09:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ICS 2004 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Specific-source template with no article-space transclusions and unclear future use. Delete. Steel1943 (talk) 23:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Even more one-transclusion election templstes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Election templates with one transclusion each. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 10:23, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UK Customs rank insignia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of full-size iPod models edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:40, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Largest Metropolitan Areas of Mexico edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. There's no good reason not to transclude it elsewhere, so I've added it to several other articles. Nyttend (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as it is in use on other articles now and is encyclopedic content Atlantic306 (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IBL edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Map with one article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:36, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete - Map showing the location of the 6 teams in the 2007 Israel Baseball League, a league that only lasted 1 season. No other possible use. Nigej (talk) 10:32, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Croydon and Gatwick weatherbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gunpowder plotters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to remove the <imagemap>...</imagemap>. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:45, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image map with one article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete; small image-map without a lot of code, so there's no reason to keep it separate. Nyttend (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace with image and delete - the image with a clever facility so that you can place the cursor and the name of the person pops up. However, the name are on the image anyway, so seems pointless, especially since when I try it the wrong name often pops up. Nigej (talk) 10:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fb pl ESP 2007 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Specific-source template with one transclusion and no obvious ability to be used elsewhere. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:13, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete per nom. {{Fb pl ENG 2007}} "Squad size is unlimited." has 4 transclusions and seems similarly abandoned. Nigej (talk) 16:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Al-Maliki Government edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Queensland Legislative Assembly edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ediacaran biota timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This will break all the old versions of the articles in the history, though. My memory of these are that they were common at the time, because the code is so easy to break if they're editable in article space. One stray character and they break. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.3% of all FPs 05:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete per nom. "This will break old revisions" is not generally considered a reason to keep something, unless the template was very widely used. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 02:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Are we even allowed to do that? It breaks attribution history. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.3% of all FPs 09:55, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep part of a series of similar geological timelines at Category:Graphical timeline templates. Nigej (talk) 08:59, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Graptolite timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep the coding is complicated and will make editing the contents, and editing the article, more difficult. Better kept as a separate template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom (LT) (talk • contribs) 08:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Florida Election Recounts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:36, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TaipeiFest Best Director edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

navigation template for an award without article The Banner talk 19:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TaipeiFest Best New Talent edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

navigation template for an award without article The Banner talk 19:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom. Does not merit inclusion on linked articles therefore no point. --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Taipei_Film_Awards#Individual awards lists some of the winners (last column). The template is similarly incomplete. Only three blue links if we ignore the ensemble cast. Rather minor award, so seems excessive. Nigej (talk) 11:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Golden Horse Award Audience Choice Award edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

navigation template for an award without article The Banner talk 18:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Metro system of the World edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:32, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant as discussed here Cards84664 (talk) 08:50, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, agree with nom, the linked discussion indicated most people were in agreement that it is unnecessary and does not have any meaningful relationship to link all metro systems together in such a way Heights(Want to talk?) 00:31, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Hindu leader edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was procedural close. The previous TFD still stands - if the merger hasn't been finished then it should be added to WP:TFD/H so someone can take care of it. Primefac (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Hindu leader with Template:Infobox religious biography.
Already a wrapper, No distinct parameter, WP:INFOCOL. Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 03:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Christian leader edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 February 18. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 07:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PH 16 cities edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:31, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is content hiding out in the template space without any obvious reason, and seems to have quite a bit of unnecessary complexity. It should be substed into each of the articles as appropriate and then deleted. Izno (talk) 02:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Xslt-box edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused template Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update after Andy Dingley WP:BOLDly reverted my change: Template with nothing but an image that can and should be moved directly to the article. There is not reason for an infobox template to house a single image for one article. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It's only 'unused' because you're going around removing it first! [1] Andy Dingley (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Andy Dingley: oh FFS you have got to be kidding. The template contains nothing but an image. It seemed like a pretty open and shut case. You're vote (see WP:!VOTE) doesn't address the point of the nomination which is that the infobox contains nothing but an image that is used on 1 page. Why on earth does that need an infobox template? --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • So make an honest nomination. Not an obviously untrue one. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Andy Dingley: it was honest... I made a totally legit and valid edit, placing the image on the page and removing the template. Then I nominated the template. You chose to revert my edit for absolutely no reason. It has nothing to do with the merits of the edit, you just didn't like my process. So that is YOUR issue. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete - this is a plain image without any code at all added, so the template is actually a wasted template call. Also, semantically, the template is using a table (Infobox) to show an image, which should not be the way that information is presented. --Gonnym (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete per nom and Gonnym. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems that you can delete. Krauss (talk) 15:05, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete XSLT seems to use the image directly. Not clear why XSLT/Muenchian grouping can't do likewise. Nigej (talk) 19:06, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete without substitution. Use a simple image instead. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Venus crater edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete Template:Infobox Venus crater after replacing with Template:Infobox crater data. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Venus crater with Template:Infobox crater data.
Only a couple of extra params that can be easily passed directly. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:03, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_11&oldid=884164891"