Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 March 23

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 22 March 24 >

March 23 edit

Template:Winston-Salem State Rams men's basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 21:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles men's basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 21:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I would also add that I question any presumption of notability for Division II coaches. So many of these folks won't have articles anyway. Rikster2 (talk) 13:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lenoir–Rhyne Bears men's basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two links... fails WP:EXISTING. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 20:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I would also add that I question any presumption of notability for Division II coaches. So many of these folks won't have articles anyway. Rikster2 (talk) 13:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:*mp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Seems like the transclusion counter was fooled. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template is supposedly deprecated and no longer in use (the past deletion discussion happened when it was still in use). Worth noting that if it gets deleted the listing on WP:CASC should be removed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I am not sure how you can say it is not in use when it claims to link to 34,000 pages.--Grahame (talk) 00:09, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Grahamec: That is just the documentation - but apparently WhatLinksHere shows transclusions when the tool doesn't. Huh? JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 07:38, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well it is used at "In the news" at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board and I am sure at many other places.--Grahame (talk) 07:50, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:InlineImageAnnotations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anywhere anymore. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ImageWithNotes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anywhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ImageNoteColors edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template does not appear to be in use anywhere, nor has it any links. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotice loader edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like this template was never put to use, as it has no transclusions and no sensitive links. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:54, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Documentation/links edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template appears to belong to an old form of {{Documentation}}, but is apparently no longer in use anywhere. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cockermouth & Workington Railway edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused duplicate of Template:Cockermouth and Workington Railway RDT. Useddenim (talk) 14:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If it really, really, really is unused then I'm perfectly happy for it to be deleted. As a human I can't be sure I haven't missed an instance of it being used. Can a machine do an exhaustive search? DavidAHull (talk) 23:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Just click on What links here (under Tools) on the left side of the page. Useddenim (talk) 10:41, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mentor Nestle Nesquik Torun Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless navbox, where all the listed pages (apart from the title) are redlinks. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HealthLine lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 19:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. It apparently relates to HealthLine (a bus service in Ohio), but that single-page tpopic looks fine without it. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Superseded by {{GCRTA lines}}. Adding the remaining non-redirect templates of the rail color box support system for HealthLine. — Train2104 (t • c) 13:53, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete it is obsolete. 128.172.32.16 (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Useddenim (talk) 10:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:World Series television announcers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 3. Primefac (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Super Bowl television announcers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 3. Primefac (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

NCAA Division II football coach navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 April 5. Primefac (talk) 01:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_23&oldid=773894376"