Grahamec

• User talk:Grahamec/Archive 1
• User talk:Grahamec/Archive 2
• User talk:Grahamec/Archive 3

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swiss Central Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

suggestions

thanks for your response - keep up the good work - and thanks for your persistence - we have so few like you left in the australian project - the committed and continual improvement of the place would be impossible without you imho !! JarrahTree 03:45, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Judge Advocates of New South Wales

Thanks for adding the talk page to the category. Its not the first time I have forgotten, nor the first time you have fixed it up for me. Find bruce (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

No worries.--Grahame (talk) 03:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Lal Lal Iron Mine and Smelting Works

The user who accepted this article from my draft is currently blocked. So, I cannot ask this question of them.and you were the next user (adding some categories). I have noticed that this article never comes up in a Google search, thougn its WikiCommons illustration does, and it appears in Revolry (which just requotes the Wikipedia article text). I cannot see any reason why it never comes up in a search. Do you have any thoughts on what might be happening? Thanks in anticipation.

This is more of a Google issue than a Wikipedia issue. I think Google catches up eventually. Grahame (talk) 08:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

it would be much appreciated

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Acacia_uncifera - what happens is that it doesnt take much to add the other bits, as it is it becomes a massive followup job, it all adds up over time... thanks JarrahTree 13:33, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

just back from OS. I will bear it in mind.--Grahame (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

very kind of you to respond that way - no big deal if you dont want to that, it is not a problem - it is just over the last 6 months a few of us have been trying to reduce https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unknown-importance_Australian_biota_articles down from 16,000 we are now less than 5,000 and we're getting there (ie biota articles that have at least as minimum default low importance), but as I say please dont bother if it is a problem, welcome back, hope os was ok ! JarrahTree 13:49, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

OS (Iran, Azerbaijan. Armenia, Georgia, Greece, Italy, Switzerland, France and Germany) were good, but with lost sleep and Canberra's winter I have come down with a cold or flu, although I seem to be recovering.--Grahame (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

grr, the flu, grrr, the flu is not that obvious here in Sydney at the moment... trust you get better soon JarrahTree 05:09, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mainz Hauptbahnhof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norddeich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Köln Hauptbahnhof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to SBB and Wien Meidling

Düsseldorf Hauptbahnhof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wien Meidling

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fitzroy County

A tag has been placed on Category:Fitzroy County requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:08, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Blaxland County

A tag has been placed on Category:Blaxland County requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dortmund Hauptbahnhof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SBB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

message

I had left a message that could have been easily misconstrued, removed it, trust all is well.. cheers JarrahTree 09:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

I must say that I see some point in tagging articles to the project but less for rating the importance of them to sub-projects, even though that importance is almost always "low". I could stop tagging them at all if that was more convenient.--Grahame (talk) 12:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

please dont say that - its very important what you do - the idea of simply adding importance=low if you could would be fantastic - but no big deal, the frustration is well beyond anything personal - the whole system seems disinterested in keeping things going - your work is very important - please dont get me wrong JarrahTree 12:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

have been thinking about all of this very carefully, any tag is better than none, its not the follow up tag as much as the first, however done - that is so important. It is hard to explain here, but it makes your hard work even more valuable as it is found. So thank you so much for your consistent and persistent work, there is real value to it, more than followup tags, I will try to articulate the reasoning sometime... JarrahTree 03:55, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

wow thank you so much for your recent batch of edits, you are so kind and generous to do that - appreciated very much (I know its just adding a bit of text to an edit, but you cannot imagine how helpful that is !) JarrahTree 02:39, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Würzburg Hauptbahnhof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

For services to talk pages

"Place without a Postcard" Prize

Thanks for your indefatigable trailing after me creating Talk pages. You will probably be relieved to hear that my "Place with a Postcard" project to get all Queensland localities and towns onto Wikipedia at least as stubs is almost at an end. I'm down to the last 20-30 to go and they are mostly tricky time-consuming cases, like islands in the Torres Street, Aboriginal Shires that take chunks out of other shires, abandoned towns beside abandoned railway stations that all need special thinking about, and hence will be much slower. Then all I have to do is expand all those stubs I've made ... but for you, the deluge is over! Kerry (talk) 15:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks.--Grahame (talk) 01:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leonard Edward Bishop Stretton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:History of Australia topical overviews

Category:History of Australia topical overviews has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. --Sm8900 (talk) 21:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Note re CFD

the editor who nominated the category above also wants to delete ALL such categories. please go there and comment. and please notify anyone else who might be positively inclined. thanks. --Sm8900 (talk) 21:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

thanks

a single edit like that means a lot, thank you (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Robert_Boylen) - appreciated. JarrahTree 10:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

but (but ...) wheres the { { infobox } } ? just saying Dave Rave (talk) 02:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC) (hides)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darmstadt Hauptbahnhof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eberbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Australian Labor Party officials

Thanks for populating that! I can't believe we forgot to do it for four years. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

No worries.--Grahame (talk) 07:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Australian biota project

Has got to a new stage of its progress in this confusing and chaotic world... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unknown-importance_Australian_biota_articles = 0. Please help by when creating new biota articles for australia, to make sure the unassessed page stays the way it is adequately tagged, or please ask for help in doing so... More on the next stages of the Australian biota project soon... and thanks for whatever you have done for the project in any way since 2006 - JarrahTree 06:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

A marked quota of quote marks!

Looks like they have 4RRed at Natasha Smith (diplomat) .. but I am moving on to better things ... Aoziwe (talk) 12:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

I also have better things to do to. Not that I am convinced that every minor diplomat deserves a page, although I am somewhat jaundiced having wasted 7 years at DFAT.--Grahame (talk) 12:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

For services to the Eurobodalla Shire

	Epic Eurobodalla!
	Great to see your articles on more NSW places! Kerry (talk) 22:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

"North Gippsland (disambiguatoin)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect North Gippsland (disambiguatoin) should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 23#North Gippsland (disambiguatoin) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Greg Mortimer

Hi, due to recent infection of pandemic into the ship and the name Greg Mortimer is popularly being known as the ship. it does not have article but is this draft okay? if not hoping for the help. see Draft:Greg Mortimer (ship). thank you. 181.53.12.204 (talk) 04:44, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

I have cleaned up the article concerned deleting a lot of stuff copied direct from the Greg Mortimer article which was not linked to. But I believe the article is unnecessary as the link to Aurora Expeditions where the coronavirus paragraph has been added, should suffice, although the text is still subject to further improvement.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:55, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm not an expert on ships or which ships are notable, but I agree that the Aurora Expeditions and the 2020 coronavirus pandemic on cruise ships articles are suitable places to discuss the coronavirus outbreak.--Grahame (talk) 06:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

well done

congrats on reaching the 200,000 edits ! well done, hope you still keep it going - good on ya ! JarrahTree 10:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks/--Grahame (talk) 10:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

and have a safe easter and all - JarrahTree 10:50, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Update

		COVID-19 Barnstar
		for updating the ship's articles related to the pandemic. IP 49 from PH (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

content

unclear explanation on the article, can you add on coronavirus quarantine section on Costa Deliziosa article this: On 20 April 2020, Costa Deliziosa docked at Barcelona as planned, letting off some of its passengers, including 168 Spanish nationals. It then headed off to Genoa, with 1519 passengers and 898 crew members aboard, where it docked on 2020.04.22. This ship is likely to be the penultimate cruise ship to unload all its passengers during the pandemic, with Artania being the only ship left with passengers on board at the time Costa Deliziosa docked.

References

Proposed deletion of Andrew Andersons

The article Andrew Andersons has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. HeartGlow30797 (talk) 04:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Solothurn–Moutier railway; have we met?

Hi Grahamec; I just stumbled upon the article Solothurn–Moutier railway translated by you in 2018, thanks for that! I live at that line, made some edits to the German article and also took the photos. When I saw on your user page that you're from Australia, I remembered that I talked to a railway enthusiast from Australia at Wikimania 2019 in Stockholm, but I didn't remember his name. That couldn't have been you by any chance? If it was you, then you might remember that we also talked about steamboats (although we in Switzerland call them "ships") on Swiss lakes. I wrote some German articles about Lake Lucerne's historic steamers, namely Uri, Unterwalden, Schiller, Gallia, and Stadt Luzern, and the Australian railfan who might have been you seemed to show some interest in translating these into English... ;-) Gestumblindi (talk) 23:21, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. No, I have never been to a Wikimania meeting.--Grahame (talk) 02:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, so it must have been someone else... still, I find it quite fascinating that a railfan from the other side of the world has translated that article about my local railway line :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 22:09, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

I use Google translate and then fix the translation so that it makes more sense. It is a way of learning a smattering of German. I like visiting Switzerland, Germany and Italy, where I work on translation on rail-related articles. I have travelled on some of the lines, but not the Solothurn–Moutier railway, although I have been down parallel roads.--Grahame (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

It is quite a nice line. Nothing spectacular, but on clear days, there can be a fine view of the Alps, first on the left side between Langendorf and Lommiswil, then after the big Lommiswil curve on the right side. Near Crémines, shortly before arriving in Moutier, the view of the Jurassic landscape is also beautiful. And of course, there is the aerial lift from Oberdorf station to the Weissenstein, which is now a bland gondola lift instead of the original chairlift, which I think is a pity, as the chairlift was the last of its type (Von Roll VR 101) in Switzerland, and there were considerable attempts to save it. You might find de:Sesselbahn Oberdorf–Weissenstein interesting. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Error fix

Can you correct the typo caption on the 2nd image of the Carnival Valor article. It says Liberty of the Seas when it is clearly Carnival Valor. 14.192.212.129 (talk) 09:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Actually it was Carnival Legend, not Valor, so I have deleted it.--Grahame (talk) 15:14, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freiburg–Colmar railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for adding categories to Inger Mewburn

Thanks for your help on Inger Mewburn. I didn't know how to add the categories and project boxes. --Jonathan O'Donnell (talk) 06:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited EV6 The Rivers Route, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danube Valley Railway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weiden–Oberkotzau railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hof.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

"New and improved Karlsruhe–Basel railway line" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect New and improved Karlsruhe–Basel railway line. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 1#New and improved Karlsruhe–Basel railway line until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 03:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

fyi

the oz com party category was queried by self at the oz politics talk page and no one turned up, sigh... I am sure there were 3 or 4 and there was never a single entity... which is why I didnt tag it... cheers... JarrahTree 13:10, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for that... JarrahTree 13:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Chinese HSR

Thanks for adding the route to Lianyungang–Zhenjiang high-speed railway, I've been meaning to learn how to do that myself! Is there an established convention for links, ie, instead of "Nanjing–Qidong railway" you've written "Ningqi railway". My preference is to use the full location names as I find it easier, especially when we're dealing with Pinyin rather than characters. NemesisAT (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for my slow response, so for the stations I used the first source for the names. I'll check over this again. And for the route templates, I'm not that fussed either - but am happy to format them one way or the other for sake of consistency. Best wishes NemesisAT (talk) 23:16, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Giinagay Way, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pacific Highway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bobadah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for taking the time to review & fix my edits, particularly when I make stupid copy/paste errors like I did at Electoral results for the district of West Maitland. --Find bruce (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

They happen. I have done the same.--Grahame (talk) 10:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Nuremberg–Cheb railway

Hi,

I saw your reversion of my recent edit to this page. I'm cleaning up CS1 errors, and the semicolon in the non-breaking space code (nbsp;) in editor parameters of two citations causes the page to appear on the list at Category:CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list. I understand why you reverted my edit, to keep the e and V from breaking up at the end of a line. I looked for Hofer Eisenbahnfreunde e. V. on the internet, and frequently found it with "e.V." no space after the period following the e. I don't understand German punctuation rules, but the lack of a space after a period is definitely a Germanism in this situation. Is it OK to re-edit the page that way ("e.V."), or can you suggest another way so that it doesn't generate a CS1 error?

Ira

Ira Leviton (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

My main objection was that you can't have a rule that bans "& nbsp;" and similar. These are not banned in Wikipedia and if an alert system is picking them up as a fault it needs to be rewritten. I don't particularly care about this specific application.--Grahame (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Living people

Will you please stop putting Category:Living people onto band articles. Per that category, "This category is for articles structured as biographical entries for living individuals." Band articles are not "biographical entries for living individuals". You adding the wrong category screws up all sorts of downstream work in which there is a reasonable expectation that Category:Living people = person. --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:10, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, but I need more feedback

Södermanland runic inscription 140 passed the DYK process and was presented on 15 January, Wikipedias birthday, and I have spent a lot of time making it as good as possible. Your feedback was: "missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup." Could you please clarify the following issues, where relevant to your evaluation:

• What important content is missing?
• What parts contain much irrelevant material?
• What reliable sources are missing?
• What are the significant problems?
• What requires substantial cleanup?

I really appreciate that you paid attention to this article and that you took your time to evaluate, but I need more specific feedback here. Please answer on the talkpage and I will address those issues and try to improve the article.--Berig (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Yngvadottir has addressed your concerns. It would have been easier to leave the rating blank, but there are a lot of blank ratings in Wikipedia.--Grahame (talk) 04:30, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Help updating route diagram template

Hello, if you've got a spare minute could you update Template:Hangzhou–Ningbo high-speed railway to show Hangzhou South railway station as operational? I can't seem to get it working myself. NemesisAT (talk) 15:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Palm Island GA Reassessment

Palm Island, Queensland, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Whiteguru (talk) 08:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Some help requested with 'John McKenzie (colonial settler)'

First, thank you so much for reviewing this article. Now, could I ask you to assist me with a problem that I am not yet confident enough to solve myself? When I wrote the article, I started with sources that spelt the name as 'McKenzie' but now having published it and reviewed the cited material again, I have come to the conclusion that the descendants use 'Mackenzie', as do many other, but by no means all, sources. I now believe that he signed himself 'Mackenzie' and it is on his memorial inscription that way. Of course, spelling in those times was less stable than it is today, but in the end I had to go with 'Mackenzie',in a recent revision. However, that change leaves the article title inconsistent with the article. I know this can be fixed (redirected) but I have not done that before and I am conscious that I do not want to do any damage. Would you be able to assist me to make 'McKenzie' into 'Mackenzie' in the title. Thanks in anticipation.TrimmerinWiki (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Fixed. This created an automatic redirect.--Grahame (talk) 01:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nuremberg S-Bahn

Template:Nuremberg S-Bahn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 12:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

I don't take part in discussions in relation to Template:Rail-interchange. It appears to be a closed shop.--Grahame (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:ÖPNV Berlin

Template:ÖPNV Berlin has been nominated for merging with Template:Rail-interchange. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 12:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Categorization, can you please guide?

Maryvank (talk) 22:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Grahame, you removed Economist categorization onSaul Eslake I am new here, I am not understanding why Australian Economists are not Economists. Aren't they economists as well as Australian economists? Can you please guide how categorization work in Wiki?

as you get to the 211k edits

thanks for all your tagging, and diligent oz things - the project would not be as well kept up without your care of the things that need attending to. I was a bit sensitive about the short tagging of death from pneumonia tags - I had it (pneumonia) diagnosed last year - but seem to be still here, so assume I am still alive. Also, I have noticed from my edits from ten years ago and more - the lack of the biog tag on cats that are to do with people. Maybe I am as strange as I feel at times. Best wishes, keep up the good work! JarrahTree 05:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Allan, Queensland

Just FYI. I have emailed the Qld Place Names folk (with whom I regularly correspond about place name information) to get their views on the conflicting sources for the origin of the name, but they can take a long time to reply (they either reply within a day or it takes months). But the guy who normally replies quickly is on leave at the moment so I am not expecting a quick reply. Kerry (talk) 11:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MRB-RP color

Template:MRB-RP color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MRB-RP lines

Template:MRB-RP lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hesse-SE templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Hesse-SE templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 20:23, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt–Plochingen railway

Template:Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt–Plochingen railway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-NRW left/90

Template:S-line/RB-NRW left/90 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-NRW left/19a

Template:S-line/RE-NRW left/19a has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-NRW left/49

Template:S-line/RE-NRW left/49 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-NRW right/19a

Template:S-line/RE-NRW right/19a has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-NRW right/49

Template:S-line/RE-NRW right/49 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Featured Article Save Award

On behalf of the FAR coordinators, thank you, Grahamec! Your work on Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory has allowed the article to retain its featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. I hereby award you this Featured Article Save Award, or FASA. You may display this FA star upon your userpage. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:04, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks.--Grahame (talk) 03:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to sign up as a AfC reviewer

Hi, I see that you have been manually moving articles from draft space to the main space. During such manual actions, there may be steps left out, i.e. clearing the drafts of comments (AfC comments, HTML comments, etc), setting categories, etc.). Consider applying to be a AfC reviewer, which will avail you the AFC helper script. The script semi-automates the draft acceptance process. – robertsky (talk) 01:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Stephen Housden

Thanks! I should have done that days ago. Good to see you picked it up.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks !!

I guess you know what I am thanking you for... JarrahTree 02:03, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

No worries. Grahame (talk) 00:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Possible help for a new Wikipedia editor

Hello! I am currently new to Wikipedia editing, having taken up a university course where we are encouraged to work on a stub article and turn it into a B- or C-class article. I have noticed that you are relatively active on here, and are a member of the Australian history WikiProject. I have chosen Peter Nicol Russell who was a Scottish/Australian engineer and philanthropist in the 1800's. If you had the chance, would you mind assisting me with providing some advice on the article via its talk page? I'm also looking for someone to review and grade the article per the Australian history WikiProject or the Biography WikiProject guidelines if you (/you know anyone who) can help Many thanks!! Chasseur99 Chasseur99 (talk) 07:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:MRB-RP templates

A tag has been placed on Category:MRB-RP templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:21, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-Bahn-NRW

Template:S-Bahn-NRW has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RRSB left/S19

Template:S-line/RRSB left/S19 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:35, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RRSB right/S19

Template:S-line/RRSB right/S19 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rostock S-Bahn

Template:Rostock S-Bahn has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-Bahn Rostock lines

Template:S-Bahn Rostock lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-Bahn Rostock stations

Template:S-Bahn Rostock stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock left/S2

Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock left/S2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock left/S3

Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock left/S3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock right/S1

Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock right/S1 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock right/S2

Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock right/S2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock right/S3

Template:S-line/S-Bahn Rostock right/S3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-Bahn-Hannover

Template:S-Bahn-Hannover has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:16, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MESB stations

Template:MESB stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:49, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-Bahn Mittelelbe

Template:S-Bahn Mittelelbe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 23:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Stadtbahn-S-U

Template:Stadtbahn-S-U has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/VGF left/U8

Template:S-line/VGF left/U8 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/VGF right/U8

Template:S-line/VGF right/U8 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Rostock S-Bahn succession templates

A tag has been placed on Category:Rostock S-Bahn succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ÖPNV Hamburg

Template:ÖPNV Hamburg has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:22, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:S-Bahn Mittelelbe succession templates

A tag has been placed on Category:S-Bahn Mittelelbe succession templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-RP right/18

Template:S-line/RE-RP right/18 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Trajectory of edits

Does this mean you will be in Perth soon? JarrahTree 10:48, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

@JarrahTree On 17th but we are travelling back east on 18th. Grahame (talk) 07:29, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

hey sounds like a very short turn around time - trust the weather isnt too cold and wet for you - safe travelling!! JarrahTree 14:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

@JarrahTree Yes. I was in Perth for a couple of days last year but people are in a hurry to get back to their lives. My brother and sister in law want to get back to Japan to visit their granddaughter.Grahame (talk) 23:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Grahamec!

Happy New Year!

Grahamec,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 23:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 23:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Elouera, Cobar, New South Wales

Hi Grahamec, I have noted that you deleted the hatnote from this article, and I understand your reason and happily agree. The only thing I ask is that the hatnote on 'Elouera Beach' is retained. There is a redirect page, just called 'Elouera', which redirects to the beach article. So, somebody looking for just 'Elourera' can be redirected to the beach article, hence the need to retain the hatnote pointing to the 'other Elouera'. TrimmerinWiki (talk) 21:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

No worries. Grahame (talk) 23:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/DB-IC left/95

Template:S-line/DB-IC left/95 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/DB-IC right/95

Template:S-line/DB-IC right/95 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Weird edits at Hefei West railway station

Obviously, Line 1 and Line S1 of Hefei Metro are different lines. (You can read the articles of the two lines in Chinese wikipedia. ) Your weird and possibly Spam edit on Hefei West railway station is reverted by me. Please don't do these spam edits in future.27.124.38.198 (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

What a rude person. He should learn the meaning of spam.--Grahame (talk) 01:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

He's been edit warring across multiple IP addresses on the article for Tianjin–Weifang high-speed railway. Is your template Template:Tianjin–Weifang high-speed railway RDT accurate and are his edits on the template page accurate? It feels like he's trying to claim ownership. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

The map and the Tianjin–Weifang–Yantai high-speed railway articles are translations from the Chinese Wikpidia, which has articles for the Tianjin–Weifang–Yantai HSR, the Weifang–Laixi high-speed railway and the Qingdao–Rongcheng intercity railway (250 km/h), which has a branch to Yantai. OpenStreet Map does now show a separate HSR under construction between Weifang and Laixi but the Chinese Wikipedia does not have a map it yet. I don't see any point in designing a map for the extension in advance of Chinese Wikipedia. Perhaps the IP might put together such a map.Grahame (talk) 01:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

So, does it mean it should be displayed regardless of what this IP says? If the map is halfway finished then it still shows accurate information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I think the map we have is better than no map.Grahame (talk) 03:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Well, there's two against one. I'd recommend you do it. I'm tired of the back and forth. If he reverts just report the IP's that have been removing the map. Considering how he call you out for "spam" shows very little consensus-building on his part, it might be best to probably request page protection. But thanks for your insight. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

The reference to "spam" seems to relate to a minor edit I made to the Hefei West railway station article, which was in fact wrong on further investigation. I have reverted his reversion.--Grahame (talk) 03:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andernach station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norddeich.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-RP left/15

Template:S-line/RE-RP left/15 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/DB-IC left/75

Template:S-line/DB-IC left/75 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/DB-IC left/76

Template:S-line/DB-IC left/76 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/33

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/33 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/52

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/52 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/56

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/56 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:43, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Würzburg–Aschaffenburg railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karlstadt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/22

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/22 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/51

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/51 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/58

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/58 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/60

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/60 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/61

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/61 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/63

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/63 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/66

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/66 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/51

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/51 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/53

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/53 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/58

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/58 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/60

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/60 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/61

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/61 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/66

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/66 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/69

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/69 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:31, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/42

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/42 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/94

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse left/94 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/42

Template:S-line/RB-Hesse right/42 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/20

Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/20 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/50

Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/50 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/54

Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/54 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/55

Template:S-line/RE-Hesse left/55 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse right/50

Template:S-line/RE-Hesse right/50 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse right/54

Template:S-line/RE-Hesse right/54 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-Hesse right/55

Template:S-line/RE-Hesse right/55 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:49, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-RP left/65

Template:S-line/RB-RP left/65 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-SL left/73

Template:S-line/RB-SL left/73 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-SL left/74

Template:S-line/RB-SL left/74 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-SL right/74

Template:S-line/RB-SL right/74 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RE-RP left/17

Template:S-line/RE-RP left/17 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:54, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of railway routes in Lower Saxony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norddeich.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-RP left/26

Template:S-line/RB-RP left/26 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/RB-RP right/26

Template:S-line/RB-RP right/26 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Münster Hauptbahnhof, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SBB.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RB-SL templates

A tag has been placed on Category:RB-SL templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject proposal you may be interested in

Hi, there is currently a proposal for an Australian Transport Wikiproject. I thought you may be interested due to your edits and interests in transport in Australia. The proposal can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Australian Transport. If you are interested, add yourself to the Support section of the page. Thank you! JML1148 (talk | contribs) 10:34, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-Bahn-Tessin

Template:S-Bahn-Tessin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello Grahamec!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:49, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks.--Grahame (talk) 05:50, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Berlin Stadtbahn

Berlin Stadtbahn has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:01, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Skin names has been nominated for merging

Category:Skin names has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

well done!

clearing 227k with such consistent and generous (German railways specially) editing! JarrahTree 11:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks.--Grahame (talk) 11:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)