Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 January 23

< January 22	January 24 >

January 23 edit

Template:Universities in Tamil Nadu edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:11, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Universities in Tamil Nadu (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Education in Tamil Nadu}} Muhandes (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as redundant. All the articles using the "universities" template are also using the "education" template, so the use of the "unversities" one is redundant. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 23:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BECK: Mongolian Chop Squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BECK: Mongolian Chop Squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Small template with only a main article and two more, which are already linked in the main article. WP:NENAN. --LoЯd ۞pεth 22:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnecessary. – Allen4names 18:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Section template list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Section template list (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Hatnote templates documentation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Section template list with Template:Hatnote templates documentation.
Both are documentation for the series of hatnotes. Currently, both docs use similar lists of exemplary usage. Merging is aimed at ending up with one comprehensive and complete documentation for hatnotes. Good documentation will require more attention, but single page is preferable step forward. Each template can have individual text added. Fiuture, remaining name preferably Hatnote templates documentation.DePiep (talk) 21:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge -- I agree, let's merge section template list into hatnote templates documentation. — sligocki (talk) 21:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Wikipedia:Template messages/General also has an overview of hatnote and other templates. As for merging, only needed as a crosscheck (for completeness etc). imo, need not be merged. -DePiep (talk) 01:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree: agree to merge. "Hatnote" template makes more sense than "section" template. --Funandtrvl (talk) 04:18, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: all examples in the "Section" template are present in the "Hatnote template documentation" (added: 3). -DePiep (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Editnotice navbar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotice navbar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Doesn't appear to be any advantages over using the normal {{navbar}}. WOSlinker (talk) 20:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Last edit 2008, i.e. not maintained (so now grown different from hightly tested {{navbox}}). -DePiep (talk) 20:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

hatnotes CatPrevious & CatFollowing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CatPrevious (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:CatFollowing (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hatnotes for category pages. Already existing are templates {{CatPreceding}} and {{catSucceeding}}. These cover not only the temporal aspects of previous/following, but also more general logical and nominal sequences (like alphabetical and classifications). Also, Preceding/Succeeding is completed with a third hatnote {{Category pair}}. From here, there is no need to maintain another pair that only needs more clarification and researching (in help & documentation) to distinguish the terms and use them. Together they have no two uses in Category space, which indicates the level of need for them. -DePiep (talk) 19:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect useful names 64.229.103.232 (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect ditto — Robert Greer (talk) 03:49, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tim Johnson edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tim Johnson (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Director works for DreamWorks Animation and has only directed DreamWorks Animation films, so this is a 100% duplication of the DreamWorks Animation navbox. See this related TFD from December 31 where a similar decision was made to delete a similar template that was a complete overlap. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant navigation. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 22:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Superseded. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Flsrold edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Flsrold (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This information can easily be covered in prose in the articles that it is included in. Admrboltz (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Dough 48 72 23:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WRFenshaws edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WRFenshaws (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by {{Waterloo Road}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:01, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPfd2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was G2 non-admin closure.

Template:WPfd2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. This is almost a CSD G2 test page. But I'm assuming good faith. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--NortyNort (Holla) 12:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WNBL 2009-10 Position Ladder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WNBL 2009-10 Position Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. There do not appear to be season articles for the WNBL. So I don't think this is going to find any use, particularly as it is incomplete (teams only playing 1 match, etc.). — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sailor Moon sectstub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:09, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sailor Moon sectstub (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused topic specific message box. {{Expand section}} would probably do. WOSlinker (talk) 10:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, unused weeaboo-ism. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Even if this template was being used I would simply have it replaced with {{Expand section}}. – Allen4names 18:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WMATA Purple Line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WMATA Purple Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by BS-style map at bottom of infobox in Purple Line (Maryland). — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WC24 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WC24 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:WFC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Unknown purpose. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WB Election 2006-Summary edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WB Election 2006-Summary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Incomplete; the information exists at West Bengal state assembly election, 2006. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:15, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:W-League 2009-10 Position Ladder edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:W-League 2009-10 Position Ladder (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Seems to be superseded by 2009_W-League_(Australia)#League_table. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User icon clubpogo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete as G8. Image used in template was deleted long ago and without it, there isn't much left. WOSlinker (talk) 19:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User icon clubpogo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No longer useful, given its reliance on a now-deleted fair use image. No mention of "clubpogo" at WP:KIS anyway. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I know this is a "user" template, but I don't see it as a userbox, so I think this is probably the right venue (not WP:MFD). — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vtap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vtap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. This external link template appears to refer to a mobile video search website, which is hardly a useful external link. We try to avoid linking to YouTube, for goodness' sake. Also delete redirect {{VTap}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:25, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vsoetime prim edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vsoetime prim (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Volcanoes in Peru edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Volcanoes in Peru (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Superseded by {{Andean volcanoes}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Viva line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Viva line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unuesd. Purpose unclear (I mean, I can understand the general topic area of the template, but not its specific use case). — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vincennes University Campuses edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:40, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vincennes University Campuses (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Vincennes University (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one link should be in both of these very similar template. The city links definitely should not be here. WP:NENAN. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:02, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Visual effects edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Visual effects (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The question that this unused template asks is a very good one, and forms the basis of this nomination. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:View main article edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:View main article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Too specific - what is "the full layout"? One of the many diverse hatnote templates would do the job. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:40, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vienne edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vienne (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Overly specific hatnote. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Givesalad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. I was getting a little over-zealous here. Apologies to all. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Givesalad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WikiLove in salads? Really? This message was used once. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Exactly how does this qualify the template for deletion? Any WikiLove template can be used any number of times; it's there for those who want to use it. If you're going to go that route, why not nominate every WikiLove template for deletion? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Based on what I've said above. There are many WikiLove templates, and many of those involve food and drink. There are hundreds of Wikipedians who believe in using these templates, based on the numbers of those who give and gratefully receive them, and as I recall, Jimbo Wales is also in support of WikiLove templates. I'm quite sure that this template has as much right to exist as any other WikiLove template. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 05:49, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Okay, maybe my nomination was a little harsh. I'm tempted to withdraw it. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Victoria Justice Singles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Victoria Justice Singles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN applies to this unused template, as it is probably meant to be a navbox. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Victims of massacre in 1951 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, now in use. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:05, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Victims of massacre in 1951 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. All but three links go to Massacre of 1951 in Albania. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused. By the way the first two links redirect to Massacre of 1951 in Albania. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 13:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, used in Jonuz Kaceli. Template will be used more if more articles will be opened about these people, you can help (NOTE: I wasn't even notified) --Vinie007 17:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- My apologies, Vinie007. You were not the creator, but I see you ere a significant contributor. Unfortunately, Twinkle does not cater for this kind of situation. I will endeavour to notify substantial contributors in the future. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vgrabbrv2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vgrabbrv2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used in the lists where it is supposedly used. Probably obsolete. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I created it, I assume it was used at the time. I deleted it now. I have no idea why a TFD was opened for this. — Carl (CBM · talk) 01:15, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vevent date edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vevent date (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Obscure template whose purpose is highly unclear. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:VertScale edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:VertScale (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Unclear purpose. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Verror4im edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 02:36, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Verror4im (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

According to WP:WARN, {{uw-generic4}} should be used instead of this. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since no concerns have been expressed, this non-standard, redundant template should be deleted. (It is redundant to {{uw-vandalism4im}} as well as the one above, depending on the "uw-" series that has been used previously.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:44, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Veerashaiva edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G7 (author request). Airplaneman ✈ 20:06, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Veerashaiva (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Superseded by {{Veerashaivism}} and {{Lingayatism}}. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi dude u can delete the template.actually i created this because the original template was repeatedly vandalized.please continue.thank you. - SunilShamnur talk —Preceding undated comment added 06:29, 23 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vb team AZS Częstochowa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 07:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vb team AZS Częstochowa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Vb team Iraklis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. These are the only two "vb team" templates. Not needed. Also delete categories Category:Vb team templates Greece, Category:Vb team templates, and Category:Vb templates. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Variable line demo edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 05:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Variable line demo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No longer used by Help:Template as stated on template talk page. Co-template deleted. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:45, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vancouver Whitecaps FC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman ✈ 05:52, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vancouver Whitecaps FC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. "The Club" section has hashlinks. The rest of it suggests WP:NENAN, especially as the articles are pretty well inter-linked. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete superseded by {{Vancouver Whitecaps}}. Reso lute 16:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vampire: The Requiem edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 06:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vampire: The Requiem (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. All links eventually go to one of two articles. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Valuedpicturethumbs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Gone per WP:G7. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:04, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Valuedpicturethumbs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. WP:VPC is gone. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see I created this, but as VP has been retired, and this no longer is used in any meaningful way, I see no reason to keep it. So Delete if that's the done thing. --jjron (talk) 04:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Valgamaa-cat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Concensus. Zsinj^Talk 17:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Valgamaa-cat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

See earlier nomination. Maybe we need a mass nomination of these ~~Finnish~~ Estonian municipality templates. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:32, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the same reason as here. And what kind of "Finnish"? I don't see any. Flying Saucer (talk) 10:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep When did Finland and Estonia merge? 134.253.26.6 (talk) 23:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. Estonian language looks a lot like Finnish; I made a guess just by looking at the names involved. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:19, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.