Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 273

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 270 Archive 271 Archive 272 Archive 273 Archive 274 Archive 275 → Archive 280

Draft:Chicago Toy & Game Group

I, 2602:30A:2E01:4FB0:5CED:A64A:37B9:7368, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:30A:2E01:4FB0:5CED:A64A:37B9:7368 (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Devin Mroz

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Myoldring (talk) 22:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC) please recheck IMDB for this actor. thanks you kindly

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Mroz, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. IMDB is not counted as a reliable source for Wikipedia to show notability. More independent reliable references are needed to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Media Rights Capital

Article of a notable company, deleted by User:Spartaz because it was apparently created by a sock of the banned user User:Benjiboi. Personally, I feel that it runs afoul of the criteria that the page must have not "substantial edits by others". A long-standing article should not be deleted only because of its association with one user. —ViperSnake151  Talk  00:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Dorothy K. Burnham

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Kjorgen (talk) 11:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. (assuming you mean Draft:Dorothy K. Burnham.) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tyk

I, AndrewMeola, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AndrewMeola (talk) 11:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

HIP Video Promo

Attempting to update page —2603:301B:408:F600:B9CC:A092:A173:BB46 (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. SoWhy 09:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Nazim hussain Pak/Z.H. Rehber

I want this page be undeleted because I am in need of its content —Sinner (talk) 04:44, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. No such page existed. Please check the link and request again. Also, please remember that per WP:SIG your signature should include your username in some form or another. Regards SoWhy 09:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
For your information, Nazim hussain Pak, if you just want to test what something looks like, you start a new draft and you can use the preview button. Then if you don't like it you can keep editing, and not save it. Then you won't have to ask for a deletion after a quick test. (I checked your contributions, and deleted contributions and I could not see anything on Z.H. Rehber either). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Obama bin laden

The redirect page was previously deleted as a hoax/vandalism, a blatant ad, and an attack page. However, consensus has changed. Per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 4#Obama Bin Laden, this page should redirect to Osama bin Laden. —George Ho (talk) 17:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

  • There's nothing stopping you from creating it. The two 2008 deletions were not redirects, one was a political rant and the other was a short article about a site selling T-shirts. The 2007 creation was by a vandal who redirected it to Barack Obama. Hut 8.5 20:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
    • Thanks. Created the page. --George Ho (talk) 20:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Show case of Uniti steer-by-wire system at the 2016 CeBit.jpg

OTRS agent: a ticket 2017061210010987 was received from the correct copyright holder which provides the appropriate free license release for this file. Could you kindly {{ping}} me when the restoration is complete? Cheers! —seb26 (talk) 13:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

2015 St. Francis Brooklyn Terriers men's soccer team

The 2015 team was nationally ranked by the NSCAA, thus meets notability. Additionally, I intend to further improve the article. —El Mayimbe (talk) 14:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy Meeks

Article was deleted in 2014 via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Meeks, but has been revived recently. —Jax 0677 (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done Currently it is only been revived as redirect, and the other revisions have had serious issues. If it becomes a stable free standing article, then history could be restored for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

angatmakabago

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Acejabel (talk) 05:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done There was no claim of importance, which is why it was deleted with A7. If there are multiple independent and reliable references written about the blog, then you can start on a draft Draft:angatmakabago. But if no one else has written about the blog, then it is better to write about something else here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:52, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Doe Boy/Freebandz

I am Doe Boy's Brand/Marketing Manager, and was only half-way finished with the adding,deleting, and editing of my article that was not even live yet. I am requesting to get the article back to make necessary changes that also meet your guidelines in order to post and go live. Thank you. —Ben RBMG (talk) 02:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  • The article itself was deleted as clear advertising which is not restored here; instead the best alternative would be to show what can be used for a non-primary article, without using any copypasted copyvio either. Relevant policy is WP:What Wikipedia is not. SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Style of writing is different on Wikipedia as this is an encyclopedia. You will have to not be a marketer or brand manager if you want to contribute in the style needed here. Example of text that should not be included in Wikipedia articles includes "sharpen his craft " "garnered the intrerests" " and more." "countless " and "alledgely has been tied". Also text that says or suggests negative things about the person need to be individually referenced. I am commenting on User:Ben RBMG/sandbox, as that is what I think you want back. Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure applies in your case. If you think you can write an encyclopedia entry in a style for an enecyclopedia, and there are other writings out there to base a page on, you can start again in your sandbox. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Allan McKay

I, V Chernysheva, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. V Chernysheva (talk) 08:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Pfenning, BizWest, Cue Ball, Budhoo, Omallur, NextGen, Fagan, and Chase

The following pages should be undeleted and restored to their former locations in the userspace. They were all moved to the mainspace by a user other than their creator then found to be unsuitable for the mainspace for reasons which would not apply in the userspace. The consensus at WP:UP/RFC2016 (B4) was If a userspace draft is moved to the mainspace by a user other than its author, then found to be unsuitable for the mainspace for reasons which wouldn't apply in the userspace, it should be returned to the userspace. See Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 229#Unicity Productions, Play It Strange Trust, and Hack n' Smack Celebrity... for a precedent. Pinging Graeme Bartlett who participated in the related discussion I started at WT:Requests for undeletion. Courtesy ping to the administrators who deleted the pages: David Gerard, Explicit (3), Iridescent, Kudpung, Lankiveil, and Malcolmxl5.

Proposed deletion:

Criterion for speedy deletion A7:

Articles for deletion:

— Godsy (TALKCONT) 21:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Godsy: As regards to David Fagan, I offered in my close to userify it if someone committed to working on it. Are you or the original article creator going to keep working on this one with a view to getting it to the mainspace eventually? Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC).
@Lankiveil: I have no plans to work on it at this time. I cannot speak for the creator, i.e. Ben.zarsky, who has been inactive since mid-2010. I'm here because the community overwhelmingly supported the restoration of pages to the userspace under these circumstances (their rationales can be read here; numerically it was ~23 in support and ~2 in opposition). — Godsy (TALKCONT) 23:28, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
In that case, I'm going to decline to restore an abandoned draft to user space unless there is some indication somewhere that it will be worked upon; a restoration would be pointless wonkery for the sake of process. No opinion on the other ones. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:34, 21 June 2017 (UTC).
  • Decline Per Lankiveil. 1) Process wonkerei. 2) The Draft namespace is not webhost. 3) When the Draft namespace was created it was done to replace the incubator which had become a graveyard for abandoned articles. 'Draft' was not conceived to become another graveyard for perma-drafts. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
@Kudpung: Just to clarify, I'm requesting these be restored to their former locations in the userspace (as that is what the community decided was appropriate), not the draftspace. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Still process wonkery: neither Draft nor user sub pages are web hosts or repositories for abandoned work. You would need to demonstrate that 1) The creators have asked for a refund, 2) demonstrate very clearly that these users are intending to continue developing the articles, and 3.) demonstrate that these articles will stand a good chance of surviving AfD.
I see all that as just making work for yourself, and then unnecessary work for the admins who are gong to have to delete them all over again. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC).
@Kudpung: You deleted Government Higher Secondary School Omallur due it being put up for proposed deletion, while Lankiveil deleted David Fagan (educator) due to an articles for deletion discussion. Very different. Even after it has been deleted, anyone may have a PRODed article or file restored through a request for undeletion, Any page which has been deleted as a result of a proposed deletion will be undeleted upon request (unless there are other reasons for keeping it deleted, such as a copyright infringement), and An administrator may decide on their own to restore a page that has been deleted after a proposed deletion without having to make the request at Requests for undeletion. WP:PROD. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:44, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
  • I have restored the ones deleted via prod, but I have not moved the pages. Move them to draft or userspace if you wish. Even better if you improve the articles. Note if the article was at AFD then my opinion is that the AFD forum can decide deletion or move back to userspace. Since I was a discussion participant I won't act more for the more controversial restores. But others can work on them if they wish. Certainly if creators want their pages back, or someone wants to improve the page then a restore can be justified. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
    • I moved the articles that were restored back to their former locations in the userspace as you said I could if I desired. Thanks, — Godsy (TALKCONT) 02:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
This procedural nonsense is exactly what Iead to my concerns about Godsy's behaviour. Expressing those concerns turned into him bashing me all over the site then to him hounding me repeatedly. If restored, each of these pages will need to be run through yet another deletion process for no good reason at all. I don't see Godsy working AfC or WikiProject WP:ABANDONED he is just adding to administrative load needlessly. Legacypac (talk) 02:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
I think that a third party who [moves someone else's abandoned userspace draft to the mainspace] should take responsibility for the page, and if it does not survive in the mainspace, should arrange for it to be returned to the user space rather than let it be deleted for reasons which would not apply in the userspace. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 03:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
User:Godsy, User:Legacypac, cut it out. Both of you. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC).

I just wanted to provide some context since he is pinging all these admins and posting links to this discussion. I'm not going to fight over it. Legacypac (talk) 15:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

I provided links to this discussion in a couple places for context when you started making mischaracterizing statements like "restored by Godsy and moved to WP:ABANDONED stale userspace ... Godsy evidently saw value in this page so submitting it to AfC for comments and potential approval." — Godsy (TALKCONT) 16:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ELFIO

I, 85.250.138.4, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 85.250.138.4 (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

File:TommyOliverDinoThunder.jpg

I wanted this image restored because I believe it was unfairly deleted. I think it can still be useful for the article it came from and I believe it should be restored immediately. —Angelgreat (talk) 13:45, 24 June 2017 (CST) —Angelgreat (talk) 18:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done We already have File:DinoBlack.jpg, so we don't need another image there. Why do you think another unfree picture of the actor is needed? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  Not done. (e/c) Hi Angelgreat. This image was not deleted unfairly. But I think you might mean that the image should not have been removed from the article it was used in – which removal was what resulted in its deletion as "orphaned". You need background on certain rules about fair use, and how it's interpreted here under the non-free content for the distinction I'm drawing to make sense.

Images that are not suitably-free of copyright restrictions can only be used here if they meet the non-free content criteria, which are a bit complex in letter and application. Some summary points here are that we can only use one fair use image for the same encyclopedic purpose, only in the article mainspace; the single image must stay in use to remain; and generally we cannot use fair use images at all of living persons because they are replaceable while the person is alive by someone taking a photograph. We also can't use any fair use image where there's a free equivalent. What happened here is that in this edit, User:NeoBatfreak removed the image you are here about, and replaced it with File:Tommy Oliver (Jason David Frank).jpg. Since that orphaned this image, it was properly deleted as unused after an eight day waiting period.

If the images were equivalent and there was no living person issue, and no free equivalent in existence, then the question would have been, was there a good basis to remove the old image and replace it with the new image, remembering that only one can be used; one had to be deleted?

But the problem here is that the image that was removed, and then deleted, would have had to be deleted anyway, if reviewed, as clearly failing the non-free content criteria on two grounds: because it was an image of a living person with no suitable exception to the rule I can see, and because there are free images of this person, at Commons:Category:Jason David Frank at the 2013 Wizard World New York Experience. The image that replaced this one has a much better claim to meeting an exception to the rules, because unlike this image, it is of him in the power suit, but I think the image that replaced it need to be deleted as well. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Muneer Abdul-Munim Al-Ali

Changes and further information are being added. I would say that introducing new innovative surgical procedure, and co-founding one of the international medical societies have to be indications of notability for any doctor —Widmun (talk) 21:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muneer Abdul-Munim Al-Ali, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. I have also deleted the re-creation of the page. LinkedIn is the place to write about a person's career. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:T.A._Talbott

I intend to fix the problems that caused the denial; delay was due to inattention to page actions; —Sdowler (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. References are needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Elliot Leung addresses the press during the Shenzhen Arts Festival.jpg

OTRS agent: a ticket 2017052510014415 was received which alleges permission for this file under a free license. Could you kindly {{ping}} me when done so I can investigate it? Cheers! —seb26 (talk) 00:00, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Surrogate mother and child.jpg

OTRS agent: a ticket 2017052310001978 was received which alleges permission for this file under a free license. Could you kindly {{ping}} me when done so I can investigate it? Cheers! seb26 (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done @Seb26: note that we cannot put on a genuine OTRS permission ticket, so please update the files permission. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Waldon Approach

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Pondswimmer (talk) 09:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Although it was stated that the article had not been updated for 6 months I had updated the request for revision of the reference section about two months ago and had not received any further review

I notice that Draft:The Waldon Approach has not been deleted. EricEnfermero (Talk) 09:06, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Global Reports on Adult Learning and Education (GRALE)

Seems to have been prodded without proper consideration of alternatives to deletion. WP:CONTESTED states "Any page which has been deleted as a result of a proposed deletion will be undeleted upon request". —Andrew D. (talk) 09:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I should point out that in its current form the article is entirely taken from a UNESCO report and would need serious work to bring it up to scratch. Hut 8.5 13:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dee Dee Chan

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Harrywind (talk) 15:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nippon Bearing Co. Ltd.

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Marvinwest (talk) 14:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

CPC character set

Non-notable, should becomes notable if needs more sources —Rowan03 (talk) 21:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Please write more introduction as well as adding references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy Meeks (model)

Article was deleted in 2017 via speedy deletion without WP:AFD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

  • I see you have consulted the deleting admin and straight out restore was declined, though userfication was offered. So if you want to turn this into a draft or a userspace draft, then we can do this for you, else you can go for a deletion review. However, to give a you a clue if it is worth starting all over, or building on what was there before, the total text on the deleted page said this: "Jeremy Meeks is an American model and former criminal. Meeks first came to prominence after his arrest in 2014, when his mug shot went viral due to his attractive physical appearance.[1] Meeks was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm.[2] Upon his release from prison in 2016, Meeks began a successful modeling career.[3][4][5]" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

ELOT 927

Non-notable, should notable to match ELOT 928/ISO 8859-7 —Rowan03 (talk) 22:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

NEC APC character set

non-notable, needs additional sources —Rowan03 (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

$1000 (disambiguation)

I'd made this and the following two redirects in error as I'm trying to use a userscript to speed up disambiguating links. I'd tried using it on the target of this redirect as well as those of the two listed below, only to find nothing to apply it to. I thought nothing of it and left, but somehow the script created these redirects in the process. I had them deleted under WP:G7, but now I'm told having pages like these is the standard practice per WP:INTDAB. I apologize for giving people the runaround here. —Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:51, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

2K14 (disambiguation)

Please see previous —Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:51, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

2K16 (disambiguation)

Please see previous —Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

File:MTV Canada logo.svg

This was a logo for MTV (Canada) between 2006 to 2012. It had NO "Music Television" tagline, as licence reason. However someone replaced them with File:MTV Logo.svg that had tagline. —John123521 (Talk-Contib.) RA 09:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done Please use it and remove count down to delete if you do. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Largest patent settlements

I, Mattojgb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattojgb (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Bubbyism

Page Was Deleted —DesertedProject (talk) 02:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Financial Fortitude Radio Show

I, Leaddog1969, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Leaddog1969 (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

I restored this for you last year and there was no improvement made. What work do you plan this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
@Leaddog1969: I am waiting for you to respond here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello and thank you for the response and question. Previously, I was personally unable to provide what was needed in order to have the page published. However, now the show has continued to grow and another producer was added who believes she can indeed create it in a way that would meet the requirements for approval. Thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leaddog1969 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Adam Kolarek

Was just called up to the majors leagues, making him notable. —Yankees10 03:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Why undelete though? It was valid at the time, if he's notable now shouldn't you just recreate it without the old edit history? – Muboshgu (talk) 03:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
If it was deleted years ago, I would agree, but was only deleted at the end of 2016. I don't think it hurts to bring the history back.--Yankees10 03:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Then again, if there isn't an extensive history then it probably isn't necessary. Oh well, we'll see what an admin decides.--Yankees10 03:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Yeah my thought is that there probably wasn't an extensive history, it wasn't a controversial delete, it was the right call at the time and things change to make the subject notable which should make it a new start. But the admin will decide. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:44, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. These are undeleted automatically if someone requests them, but there is substantial content here that may be useful in the future. Hut 8.5 06:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

WiGLE

A search of Google News for wigle wifi shows the subject of the page is newsworthy/notable, Several other Wiki pages linked to it, or to WiGLE_(WiFi), which I believe had forwarded to WiGLE. —PTMY (talk) 23:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I strongly suggest you add further/better references to the article to avoid it being deleted again. Hut 8.5 06:42, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Theodore Roosevelt Council CSP.png

driveby/vandalism edit to article not on my watchlist removed image long enough to become deleted —Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Scouting for Food.png

driveby/vandalism edit to article not on my watchlist removed image long enough to become deleted —Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

National Cotroceni Museum

Is important for National Cotroceni Museum to have a wikipedia page. Cotroceni Palace and National Cotroceni Museum are different things. —Anonim2016 (talk) 06:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

  • We would need someone to write an acceptable article, that is one that is not a copy of the palace article, not a copyright violation, not an advert and actually has some content. There is nothing in the history that is useful. I suggest you have a look at some other museum pages here to see how they are structured. They should not look like the web page of the museum. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Constructium

non-notable font, needs sources —Rowan03 (talk) 23:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Fairfax (typeface)

non-notable, meant for text editors and terminals, needs sources —Rowan03 (talk) 23:15, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Neither this nor your previous request strike me as good rationales for restoring deleted pages. This sounds more like a rationale for getting rid of them in the first place. "Needs sources" is the only thing that sounds like a petition to restore the pages, with the implicit promise that it will be rectified soon. Are you perhaps saying these were the reasons it got deleted in the first place? If you're planning on making them better, it might just be best to start a new article where the old ones existed, with the problems fixed as early in the edit history as possible, or perhaps you can ask for userfication of the deleted content per WP:USERFY. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 04:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Khushbu Thakkar

Please restore my draft as want it to resubmit this article. I have removed unsourced informations and added few more project on which the person is working on. I have also added new citations for the same. [[[User:Sdhakray|SuryaDhakray]] (talk) 11:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) SuryaDhakray (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

  • I have added the submit banner for you. The page was not deleted so we did not need to restore anything. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Exploring.svg

driveby/vandalism edit to article not on my watchlist removed image long enough to become deleted —Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

It's not deprecated, still in use.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:03, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
OK,   Done Hut 8.5 17:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Spinner (game)

This article was previously prodded in 2006 and deprodded. This means that the 2016 prod (10 years later) was invalid, and AfD is required. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@GeoffreyT2000: I'm not sure where you got that from, I can't see any PROD in the edit history at all, and the only edit from 2006 is the one which created the page. We can undelete anyway as a contested proposed deletion, do you want that? Hut 8.5 17:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

1.8_Renwick

We at OTRS have received an OTRS permission from Studio Echelman related to content allegedly under copyright on that deleted page. Please confirm: Ticket#2017062810019931 . I would higly appreciate if you could ping me when this request is answered, so as to provide an answer to the donor. —Darwinius (talk) 18:48, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Darwinius:   Done can you tag the article talk page appropriately to confirm the permission. Hut 8.5 20:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
@Hut 8.5: -   Done, thank you very much for your help.--Darwinius (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Complete Vocal Technique

Complete Vocal Technique is the largest vocal technique in the world, and has been published in several academic high ranking journals. The article on Complete Vocal Technique explained the content of the technique, with an overview of the 3 overall principles of singing, the 4 vocal modes, sound colour for changing the sound of the voice, and finally how to add effects to singing. Several principles of singing have been detailed by the technique, and the article should be elaborated upon the reflect the most recent science in the field of voice. This is not possible as the article has been deleted rather than updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathiasAaenThuesen (talk • contribs) 14:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Since @Anthony Appleyard: speedy deleted this, you should ask him what you have to do to make this non-promotional, and to get it recovered. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Jana Franziska Poll

Germany women's national volleyball team international player, silver medalist of the European League, has played for some of the best German clubs and is currently playing for CEV Women's Challenge Cup runners-up Olympiacos. She has pages in the Greek, French, Italian, Polish and Japanese wikipedias as you can see here: Jana Franziska Poll This article should be undeleted without a doubt and it's really difficult for me to understand how this article could have been deleted in the first place. Thank you very much and I'm looking forward to your help. Gtrbolivar (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Gtrbolivar:: the page was deleted because the person who created it is banned from editing Wikipedia. Banned users aren't allowed to edit and content they add is routinely removed. This should not stop anybody else from writing an article about this person, as long as there isn't anything else wrong with it. Hut 8.5 20:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
@Hut 8.5:: Thank you for your reply. I would like to access the content of the article. I will check it myself and make sure that its content is fully sourced and verifiable. Can you please put the content of the deleted article in a draft page so I can edit it? It would be a huge help. It's gonna take me forever to start the article from scratch. Thank you in advance Hut 8.5, I'm waiting for your response. Gtrbolivar (talk) 22:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett::Thanks man. I will edit it, make sure that everything is 100% sourced and verifiable. Should I move it from "draft" to "article" when I'm finished?? Gtrbolivar (talk) 22:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
  • If you determine it is worth keeping, the topic is notable, it is free of copyright infringement, and add some substantial writing yourself, then, yes, move it to an article. Once you make non-minor additions then G5 is inapplicable. The problem is if you don't want to modify it, then the speedy delete criterion applies. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the all the help man. The article is back on: Jana Franziska Poll. If you like, have a look at it. Take care Graeme. Gtrbolivar (talk) 00:38, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Youville_Centre_(2)

I, Pk1849, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pk1849 (talk) 15:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:MIPI I3C sensor interface standard

I, Burt Harris, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Burt Harris (talk) 15:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

ownabbas

the page belongs to a real notable person and the links in the information are basically for proofs and references. There might be some mistakes in making this page but the person is real. Please help me out. —Ownabbas (talk) 04:46, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Ownabbas: the article Ownabbas has never existed and no page you've edited has been deleted, which page are you referring to here? Hut 8.5 06:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Referring to User:Ownabbas, maybe? --Finngall talk 23:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

WiGLE (WiFi)

It's a redirect page for/to WiGLE, which was already restored. Not a big deal, but WiGLE WiFi has been used before, and a few, mostly user or talk, pages still link to the now missing redirect page. I expect someone might re-create the page again eventually, so why not restore the deleted redirect now. —PTMY (talk) 23:45, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done You could have recreated this yourself as it was a small effort! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Kreative Korporation

non-notable company, needs sources —Rowan03 (talk) 23:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user SoWhy (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. I can't see any claim of importance, or any independent reference either. Why do you want it undeleted? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

avinashi road flyover

Actually avinashi road is different from avinashi road flyover.its a bridge road.so i created a wiki pedia for it "Save page" button below —Balaji Ananthanarayanan 07 (talk) 03:15, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

  • It was not actually deleted, only nominated for deletion. I have changed it to a redirect. However when I look online there do appear to be newspaper stories on this flyover, so there is potential to write an article that proves notability. So when you are ready to write more you can reverse the redirect change I made and add the new facts and references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

SM City Calamba

Please restore the page under a draft under my user name. I found a few sources but I'm still waiting for more. I also intend to work on it. —BugMenn (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Global Land Ice Measurements from Space

Would like to (re)create page, fixing issues from before. —128.138.64.148 (talk) 19:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Stanislav Holý

Was PRODded. In fact it is a rather notable Czech artist. I was going to write the bio, bus saw the deletion log. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC) —Staszek Lem (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Democratic Services

I, TheGarratt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TheGarratt (talk) 20:17, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Walter Mart Santa Rosa

Please restore the page under a draft under my user name. I found a few sources but I'm still waiting for more. I also intend to work on it. —BugMenn (talk) 04:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Rawat_Public_School_CBSE

sir please let me know the reason why my page rawat public school & rawat public school cbse is redirected and deleted again and again. Now i have follow up all your guideline but don't know the reason behind deletion .Please Let know the Exact reason for deletion. How i can improve my page article ? How i can Make my page UnDeletion.Thanks —Ayushjain772 (talk) 05:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

In this case there was a deletion debate here:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawat Public School, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. You can add information about the school to the locality perhaps Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. Otherwise I suggest that you start a draft at Draft:Rawat Public School, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur and use what newspapers and magazines have to say about it to show it is notable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Global land ice measurements from space

I, 128.138.64.148, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 128.138.64.148 (talk) 19:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

  •   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Someone moved it to Draft:Global land ice measurements from space. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Rawat_Public_School_CBSE

My article was deleted through the deletion process please let me know the reason so i can improve my article —Ayushjain772 (talk) 04:21, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

@Ayushjain772: The reasons for the deletion can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawat Public School, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. —C.Fred (talk) 04:23, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Sharmaraj123 is the one that wrote the article and there are either socks/meats here. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rawatschool/Archive.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Adam Scime

I, ARtismene, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ARtismene (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

@ARtismene:   Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Petra Pudova

Hello, page Petra Pudova was deleted unreasonably. Someone has tagged this page this page "Speedy deletion nomination of Petra Pudova". So we used "Contest this speedy deletion", have explained that we are the holders of all rights and also send attached permissions by email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org [Ticket#2017070210006526]. I am a creator of this texts and holder of the rights and I would like to grant permission to Wikipedia to use their own previously published work. I am author of all published texts on the website www.petrapudova.com a wiki page Petra Pudova. What we can do more so that the page is restored? Panther PRG (talk) 20:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

  Not done. See relevant discussion at my talk page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:57, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Walter Mart

Please restore the page under a draft under my user name. I found a few sources but I'm still waiting for more. I also intend to work on it. —BugMenn (talk) 10:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_273&oldid=1142568533"