Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 206

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 200 ← Archive 204 Archive 205 Archive 206 Archive 207 Archive 208 → Archive 210

Taxation Courses Overview

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nasim54321 (talk) 10:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC) The article is fresh and shows no violation to wikipedia act of content guideline policy. The article title shows duplicacy which I think can be edited .

@Nasim54321: Can you add your content to Income tax in India? If not why is your topic different? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Kattankudy City.jpg

We have received an OTRS ticket regarding this file. Please undelete with {{OTRS received|id=2015081110005726}}. Thanks -Storkk (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

    • Storkk, undeleted as requested but I am prevented by the software from adding that template as I am not an OTRS member. Please can you do this? BencherliteTalk 13:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks, Bencherlite. I have done so. I will nominate it for deletion again if copyright situation isn't cleared up. Cheers, Storkk (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Holiday Inn Presidential Hotel

I wish to have the article draft back up so I can edit the existing article with credible sources and resubmit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HI PRESIDENTIAL (talk • contribs) 17:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

@HI PRESIDENTIAL:   Not done I did undelete this, but having read it I deleted it again under speedy deletion G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion). This was the hotel boosting itself to potential customers: "luxurious Jacuzzi baths to relax in... this pleasant establishment gives off a nostalgic and romantic air of leisure... an exceptional dining experience... our friendly, knowledgeable service staff... " etc. That is not an encyclopedia article, it is an advertisement, and nothing like that is allowed anywhere in Wikipedia.
If you wish to try again, you need to start from a clean sheet and write from a neutral point of view, no opinions, no glowing adjectives, just plain facts, neutrally stated and cited to reliable sources. You are not writing for the hotel, you are writing for Wikipedia about the hotel, from outside. Read WP:Your first article and WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide for advice. You will need references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability.
Also, as requested on your talk page, please apply at Wikipedia:Changing username for a username which will represent only you as an individual. A username on the lines of "James at HI Presidential" would be acceptable and would serve to make the necessary declaration of interest. JohnCD (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Rexnord Corporation

The page for Rexnord Corporation is purely an informational profile of the products and offerings of Rexnord Corporation. It does not contain ad or commercial speech, nor does it compare itself against other competitors. It states public information about the company, including industries served, products offered, number of employees, etc. This page is not intended to be promotional; only informational. Previously Rexnord Corporation did not have a Wikipedia page. Several companies similar to Rexnord Corporation have a Wikipedia page, which served as precedent. It does not serve as grounds for speedy deletion. Emily.white89 (talk) 19:43, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

  Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Randykitty (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. You cannot use existing pages on other companies as "precedent" since our core inclusion criteria applies to all pages. I would also suggest reading WP:Neutral point of view, which is a mandatory content criteria. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Ben Riley

Deleted as a single-source PROD a couple of months ago; re-created as a copyvio and deleted again. Riley is a notable jazz musician (among others, he played with Thelonious Monk, Alice Coltrane, and Ahmad Jamal), and I have additional source material which can be added to a reconstituted article. I would like to request restoration of the pre-copyright-violation, prodded version. -Chubbles (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

@Chubbles:   Done. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Louis "Butchie" Peraino

The page was here about 2 years ago, now it is missing. -Bacchusm (talk) 21:09, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. The page was deleted because it had been left unedited for six months. Articles for creation and the draft space are not for indefinitely hosting material that isn't to be used for the encyclopædia. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. you will have to add content, there is/was nothing in there at all. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Cold-weather biking

The article had few references and too much OR but I would like to salvage the images and captions and the few parts of referenced text for my new version of the article, which I am working on in my Sandbox. The new version will have a source for every point.Thanks!OnBeyondZebrax • TALK 22:26, 22 September 2015 (UTC) -OnBeyondZebrax • TALK 22:26, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adam Buckley (Radio Personality)

I, 203.97.61.213, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 203.97.61.213 (talk) 23:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. — Earwig talk 00:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

List of notable Star Wars substances

I would really like to access the article content and see if I can find any coverage of it before considering re-creating with proper citations. Could you provide me with a link to a downloadable version of the article or any link that would allow me to view the content. I'd also prefer a version that will give me access to the images in the article. I aim to re-write the article to meet wikipedia standards. An alternative option could be that the continent be sent to me on my talk page or email and I could develop on Wikipedia:Articles for creation for approval before publishing it.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 03:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC) -Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 03:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Nadirali, if you enable your e-mail I can send you a copy. The only images in the article were File:Deathsticks.jpg and File:Durasteel galv hole close up.jpg. However since it was deleted at AfD you would still need to run it by Postdlf prior to re-adding it to the mainspace or, if he declines to restore it, to take it to AfD. The biggest concern at the AfD was that it was listcruft, so you will need to show where these substances have received coverage in RS outside of the series' medium. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
    You can always check archive.org too. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Here's a cached version, albeit to the mobile version. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Tokyogirl79 and Amatulić, how do I check the archives? Can you show me. Thanks for the responses. I appreciate this.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 00:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Drew Garabo

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cenflamark (talk) 03:59, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Simon Jersey

Article had more than sufficient references and authoritative external links. If more detail is needed, I would rather be told what, so that I can supply these, than the page deleted. Thank you -Dcanders88 (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

@Dcanders88:   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Piotrus (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 09:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Madonna-Fever-15544.jpg

A sockpuppet uploaded the PNG version to replace the other image for Fever (Little Willie John song)#Madonna version. The JPEG version should be restored. -George Ho (talk) 04:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done the jpeg versions both have compression artifacts, and don't look good. If you can find a better quality .jpg file you can upload it, or convert it yourself from the .png. Since it is fair use it matters less who uploaded. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:ACT Foundation

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 70.113.91.73 (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I never touched this request, as far as I can see. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Now I check it was not you, you edited the revision after. It was Sphilbrick cleaning up the mess! I just ECed with Jeremy. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
It seems Sphilbrick forgot to remove the {{db-g13}} template (I've done that myself at least twice) and so it was deleted again. I've re-restored. @70.113.91.73: a standard message about the restored content appears below.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Yes I failed to remove the template. I spent so much time trying to cleanup the mess the editor left, when I finally got to the undelete part I was late for a meeting and bolted. I have a personal rule that I shouldn't do big deal edits just before leaving the computer which I failed to follow.--S Philbrick(Talk) 01:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Metal Mentiras y Motos (METAL)

I, 2620:0:1011:FD00:1F:7FDC:98E2:A9B0, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2620:0:1011:FD00:1F:7FDC:98E2:A9B0 (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IronCAD

I, Stevemc9, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevemc9 (talk) 14:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

@Stevemc9:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at IronCAD. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gateworks Corporation

I, Onthewater77, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Onthewater77 (talk) 16:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

@Onthewater77:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Triple Twist

The blog appears to be Wikipedia page notable -theworldgymnast1 (talk) 17:03, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

@Theworldgymnast1:   Done. I have restored the version before you blanked it. JohnCD (talk) 17:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:C2mtech

I, Cleverlyengaged, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. We have new sources for consideration -Cleverlyengaged (talk) 18:28, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

@Cleverlyengaged:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Mannoge Rajanan

This page was deleted by mistake, it has been on Wiki since 2009 and the reasons behind the deletion might be by error, also I have noticed unauthorized users were vandalizing, and adding non related information's. Mannoge Rajanan and the original owner of the page, created this in reference to the movies he acted on, and the company he created. Please restate his wikipedia page -Dj masha (talk) 00:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@Dj masha:  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannoge Rajanan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Davewild (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. The article in fact was not deleted by mistake or error and there are no owners of articles- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 04:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

MarketResearch.com page deletion

MarketResearch.com is a very credible, mid-sized provider of research services. We have been in business since the late 1990's and are leader in our market. We devote time and effort to maintaining our Wikipedia page to inform and educate people about the company. We have had a Wiki page since 2009 and have always taken time to make sure the article is informational and not advertising. If you allow other companies to inform the world about their business it is discriminatory to single ours out for deletion "Save page" button below -128.177.169.66 (talk) 14:24, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
But please note that since you are connected with the company you should not edit its article directly. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves, Please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and note in particular that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI. JohnCD (talk) 17:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MarketResearch.com. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

AWeber

The page gives information about the AWeber company and provides factual information about its history, services, etc. -Narolsonsd (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Topgrading

I was going to create an article and it says that only administrators can create the article. I am not sure if it was deleted previously or what needs to be done but I would request to be able to create the article. -CommonHMC (talk) 22:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

I just followed the log and see it was deleted 5 years ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Topgrading. I am hoping that I am in the right place then. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CommonHMC (talk • contribs) 22:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@CommonHMC: I would recommend you work on a Draft copy at Draft:Topgrading once you believe it is ready for the main space you can ask for a review by an experienced editor. If the experienced editor feels the article meets our inclusion criteria they will ask for the protection to be lifted and move the article to the main space. A passing administrator may also restore the old article to that space. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Waa Kuma Macalin Axmed Omaar

it is my personal profile and then click the "Save page" button below -Macalin axmed omaar (talk) 17:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Fixed link to existing article, currently tagged for speedy deletion per criteria A7 and G12. Please remember that article titles are case-sensitive. --Finngall talk 17:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
  Not done Wikipedia is not a host for personal profiles. Articles have to be in English and satisfy the inclusion guidelines. You may be wanting to use Linkedin instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:33, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Greater Cincinnati World Affairs Council

I, 192.122.237.11, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 192.122.237.11 (talk) 13:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Eddie Martin

I, Nujewiki, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nujewiki (talk) 09:51, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:40, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Daniel Baca

this is my dads page, and i think that it is important that his legacy be know . -Skyhart1357 (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. —C.Fred (talk) 00:45, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
  • You made a page at Talk:Daniel Baca saying "this is a test". There is no need to restore that. You can write at Draft:Daniel Baca, but first find what others have written on the topic, rather than relying on what you know. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Mark Meets

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) MusicMan2013 (talk) 08:18, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

JEEVAN SMRITI

Significant wiki value considering the fact that it is a docu-fiction by internationally acclaimed director Mr.Rituparno Ghosh on the life of Poet Rabindranath Tagore -Sujoynag75 (talk) 08:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Hugh L. Carey, Sylvia Dwyer, and Vincent Vita, Feb 1962.jpg

An OTRS ticket has been received regarding this image. Please provisionally restore. Thank you. -Storkk (talk) 10:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done Please apply otrs received template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

NintendoFuse

The reason stated that this website does not exist, but it clearly does exist. It was down for just a few days, though. Please reinstate the NintendoFuse wiki page. Thank you! -50.136.34.90 (talk) 19:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Actually the reason given was non-notable website. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Madegray/sandbox

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Madegray (talk) 01:59, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Madegray, this was restored at one point and while you did edit it, the page was declined due to a lack of sourcing. Do you have any new sourcing to provide that would show notability? The draft article relied heavily on WP:PRIMARY sources including a press release - do you have any independent coverage in WP:RS? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:49, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes, Jane Bordeaux is also featured on IMDb.com. She has starred in several episodes of Star Trek Enterprise , 40 episodes of Gideon's Crossing, the movie "Phone Booth" and has moved into singing and song writing. She acted under the name Cecilia Conn and has been romantically linked to Robin Thicke which is verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madegray (talk • contribs) 09:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Is there any more sources than IMDb? We don't count that as a reliable source, since anyone can write there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Allama Rafaqat Ali Haqani

real man -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tayyabmiladi (talk • contribs) 03:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Tayyabmiladi , The second time around it was deleted by Shirik as G3, Article that has no meaningful, substantive content. What you will need to be able to show these admins is that this person has received coverage in independent and reliable sources per WP:RS. Coverage does not have to be in English, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:Cfd result/testcases

It was speedily deleted at my request per WP:G7, but it is now useful to me. -~ RobTalk 03:54, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Scott Lussier

Person seems to have accumulated notability since page deletion -Prisencolin (talk) 18:50, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Lussier, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Alphachimp (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 19:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Hasteur, the admin that deleted the article is only sporadically active nowadays (Alphachimp has made only one edit since 2014) so we may need to make a bit of an executive decision on our own or the user will have to go straight to DRV. Prisencolin, can you give us examples of coverage that this person has received since 2006? If you can make a good enough case then we might be able to restore it to AfC/draftspace rather than for it to automatically have to go to DRV. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:59, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Pantech ProEd Pvt Ltd

Actually I'm new to wiki article, and i wish to create a article about a company Pantech. i request you to undelete the article Pantech ProEd Pvt ltd or allow me to create a article on the same title, i'm sure it won't be a promotional activity. due to i'm new to article creation, it may be looks like a promotional activity. but i'm keep on editing it to be a good and needful article. so kindly accept my request to create the article on same title and kindly add some more options to checks the article status (ex., whether any content of article violates wiki term and conditions. thank in advance for your consideration) -Ksamy473 (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

@Ksamy473:   Not done. Wikipedia is quite selective about article subjects: it does not expect or want to have an article about every company that exists. The test is called Wikipedia:Notability and is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Youtube, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary) and WP:Notability (organizations and companies). There was nothing in the articles you posted to indicate that this company is notable enough to have an article.
If you are connected with the company, you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and should carefully read that page and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. You are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI.
In any case, since you are new, the best way to proceed is to work on the draft you have at User:Ksamy473/Pantech ProEd Pvt Ltd and re-submit it for review only after you have added independent references to show notability. Read WP:Your first article for more advice. JohnCD (talk) 16:58, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Request to userfy Number One with a Bullet

The article was deleted after an AfD slightly favoring keep (5-4). The article is in the logs here and was deleted "17:53, 29 March 2008". Can I have this article and its history userfied into my userspace? --Bensin (talk) 16:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

@Bensin:   Done to User:Bensin/Number One with a Bullet (album) - I presume that is the title it should have if restored. Since this was deleted by AfD, and the closing admin is no longer active, I suggest you apply to WP:Deletion review when you think it is ready to go. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Okay. Will do. Thank you! --Bensin (talk) 18:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Margaret Hannan

This was apparently BLP prodded and then nominated for speedy A7 two minutes later, and speedied 7 minutes after that. The subject is a poet, and possibly Thespian, who won a significant prize, therefore there is both an easy to find reference, and a claim to notability.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 22:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC).

  •   Done But please add info on the prize and some references. The A7 speedy does look to be appropriate given what is there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ātmaprajñānanda Saraswati

I, Stallion444, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stallion444 07:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:06, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Theodore Kost

I, 99.240.170.91, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 99.240.170.91 (talk) 16:54, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:02, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Fannydin/sandbox

I, Fannydin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fannydin (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Alexander Hahn (electronic media artist)

I, Lxji Murga, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lxji Murga (talk) 22:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Alexander Hahn (electronic media artist)

I would like to continue editing the page and submit it for review again -Lxji Murga (talk) 22:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Aldag

I, LisaAdamsWalter, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LisaAdamsWalter (talk) 00:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

  Not done This was a blatant copyright violation of this page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Maryann Krieglstein

I, Dkriegls, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 05:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:06, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! The subject has already been approved as notable by multiple editors, I just lost the time to deal with cleaning up the issues. Plan to address them now and get it launched. --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 05:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Naman Chopra

I, Artdaily112, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The page is still under development, we are still adding more credible, verifiable sources and for that the page must remain live -Artdaily112 (talk) 04:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The page will remain live as long as you are working on it; it wwas deleted only because you left it untouched for six months. JohnCD (talk) 09:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Ossett Town Ladies FC

This is a valid informational article regarding a womens association football club in Wakefield, England. The associated mens club has their own page also. This is similar to Arsenal FC and Arsenal Ladies and Leeds United FC and Leeds Ladies FC. The article was put forward for speedy deletion in the very limited time I had to finish writing it! The article is now fully complete. -Minnowfire (talk) 08:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 14:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Hupy and Abraham, S.C.

I would just like the copy that was used for the page. and then click the "Save page" button below -Devoncarrots (talk) 16:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

@Devoncarrots: I will email a copy to you if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the page, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab enter your email address (which will not be visible to me or to anybody) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users." JohnCD (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Appayya Swami Aigali.jpg

An OTRS ticket has been received regarding this image. Please provisionally restore. Thank you. -Storkk (talk) 12:38, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

@Storkk:   Done. I have reset the timer - over to you to update the OTRS details, I'm not sure which is the appropriate template to use, JohnCD (talk) 17:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
@JohnCD: Thank you. It seems I may have misinterpreted a statement in the email. I thought it might be a statue covered by C:COM:FOP#India. It seems I was wrong. My credulity is certainly stretched now that I can see the photo, but will give it a couple days before nominating it for deletion. Storkk (talk) 17:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Best Arcade Script

I, Kireerike, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kireerike (talk) 22:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@Kireerike: This was restored for you back in February and nothing happened to improve the draft. What are you planning to do to improve it this time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
@Graeme Bartlett: Thank you for your question! I am planning to finish the final draft article and publish it for review. I am really sorry, but I can not go into details, because I can not see the draft article now. Although I remember I was done with the core parts of the article. So I only need to add some additional information here and there to extend the article. Thank you for your assistance in advance! Kireerike (talk) 21:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
@Kireerike:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Caleb N. Ginyard jr.

Expired wp:PROD, concern was: No individual notability, no sources. Sources will be added -ktotam (talk) 01:10, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Jean-Marc Soboth

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Geodisa (talk) 05:11, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:06, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Zanata (Software)

I, Dychen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dychen (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Michigan Auto Law

I, Gyitsakalakis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gyitsakalakis (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Note Fixed link to correct title which was deleted as G11 (Unambiguous advertising or promotion) not G13 as indicated above. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Surrealistic Madness

I, Lmc1127, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lmc1127 (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

@Lmc1127:  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Lee (Roseberry)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Davidleeiselvis4u (talk) 02:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Lee (Roseberry)

  •   Not done The deleted article history was fairly promotional and a quick search shows that portions of it were taken from other places like here and here. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material. You can file a ticket at WP:ORTS giving the site permission to use it, but you'd still have to re-write it since it was too promotional for Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Davidleeiselvis4u, It looks like the current article also has copyrighted information in there as well. Please understand that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material and that in most cases the content is too promotional to use. In the case of the current article, you direct people to places to purchase Lee's work. I also have to assume that you are likely Lee himself, so you need to read over Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy at WP:COI. You can still edit and try to create an article via AfC, but you will need to be very careful about inserting promotional tones since it is very easy to do this with a conflict of interest. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:14, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Edward Carson, Canadian Poet

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -128.100.234.106 (talk) 17:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Links and sources exist in the entry. Edward Carson has pubished three books of poetry and deserves a wikipedia page. I don't understand why I am meeting such resistance in creating one for him.

  •   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Jimfbleak (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. I also note that the page you're asking for back was created by Gowanlee who has attempted to get extremely similar articles created for the same subject. While I can't view the contents, I would guess that they were substantially similar. Some were deleted for Copyright Violation reasons. For this reason I strongly suggest you reconsider your request. Hasteur (talk) 18:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
  • It looks like this was also deleted as a copyright violation at Edward Carson (writer, photographer, businessman). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Brian O'Shea

I, Oeano, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I was waiting for clarification on facts in the article. They have now been clarified and I am ready to publish the page. -Oeano (talk) 08:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Oeano:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit and submit it as soon as convenient. . Check out WP:Biographies of living persons and WP:Verifiability - what the article says needs to be backed up by reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 08:45, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Logo Products

Company is legitimate and linked to from other Wikipedia articles. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_in_the_Chicago_metropolitan_area -Qlpbret (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Those aren't exactly serviceable arguments. Please read WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:29, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Qlpbret, if this was restored it'd likely be brought to AfD, as most of the sources were WP:PRIMARY (released by the company themselves) or were in places that would not be considered reliable per Wikipedia's guidelines, like this site. I'd feel more comfortable if this was in WP:AfC, the articles for creation process, since that would give you more time to work on the article and would also help assuage concerns over the conflict of interest. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:George Becker (Musician)

I, Repercreek, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Repercreek (talk) 09:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done Repercreek, this is somewhat taken from this bio. It's very short, but it is directly taken from there so I have to decline this. However that said, I don't mind e-mailing you a version of the article if you enable your e-mail. It's fairly short, so not restoring it won't really cause you to lose a whole lot. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:36, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Jenn Colella

I, Tayetaye, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to continue editing again and address issues to get it published -Tayetaye (talk) 13:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Tayetaye:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Please give careful attention to the comments from reviewers. JohnCD (talk) 14:01, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:NetCure

I, Thill101, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thill101 (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Thill101:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_206&oldid=1138663996"