Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 169

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 165 ← Archive 167 Archive 168 Archive 169 Archive 170 Archive 171 → Archive 175

Saccharo

Pearsonbrothers (talk) 17:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Wikipedia has an inclusion criterion called Wikipedia:Notabilitywhich is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it significant enough to write substantial comment about? See also Wikipedia:Notability (summary).
I presume that you are Pearson Brothers Winery and this is your new product. Please read Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and understand that Wikipedia is not for promotion of any kind.
You will need to ask for a change of username - see note on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Volatility Guard undeletion

Discussions ended at a point when the original proposers for article deletion had expressed satisfaction with the edition and direction of the article. -118.209.125.32 (talk) 23:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volatility Guard, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Titomirov

it is my personal page, I would like to keep it safe"Save page" button below -217.42.228.17 (talk) 02:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done. Wikipedia isn't a free web host for personal pages. Also the page was promotional and a copyright violation, and we absolutely will not restore copyvio material. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/California Coalition for Families and Children Family Court Racketeering Litigation

I, Californiacoalition, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Californiacoalition (talk) 07:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

We would like to continue development of the page for future submission for approval -Californiacoalition (talk) 07:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please note that Wikipedia doesn't allow shared accounts or usernames that imply same. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  Declined. @Californiacoalition: Who is "we"? Organizations aren't permitted to have Wikipedia accounts, only individual people can have accounts here. Go to WP:CHU/Simple to request a change of username that complies with Wikipedia:Username policy, and I'll reconsider this request. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:41, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

(Confused and uninformative title removed)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 172.56.39.64 (talk) 13:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

  Question: - IP user, what is the title of the page you want restored? Reply below here. JohnCD (talk) 17:02, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hanam Jungwon

I, Pine108, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pine108 (talk) 07:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@Pine108:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" JohnCD (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

REWORK (book)

This article should have been given enough time to be expanded before being considered for deletion. It was treated more like a malicious topic of which it is an important title that should have a page on here. -Sidewinder message me! 15:25, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@Sidewinder:  Y Userfied to User:Sidewinder/REWORK (book), though with only two sentences it was hardly worth userfying. We are rather more picky these days about obviously incomplete articles in the mainspace: people are encouraged to use the new Draft namespace or a Userspace draft to develop new articles before posting them. Check out WP:Notability (books), and please check with the deleting adminstrator, RHaworth (talk), before restoring this to the mainspace. JohnCD (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

genodynamics

i think this is a very important topic and this page should not be deleted under the course of speedy deletion if this page needs some change then i will do the changes but should not be deleted altogether -Dr biswas (talk) 04:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

The standard for all Wikipedia articles is multiple reliable sources that talk about it and have no connection to the subject or whomever came up with it. We don't regard one person thinking it's important as grounds for inclusion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
@Dr biswas:   Not done. As Jeremy says, an encyclopedia is not a place for announcing new ideas. See the fundamental policy Wikipedia:No original research, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery." JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greek Orthodox Folk Dance & Choral Festival

I, Nhendrickson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nhendrickson (talk) 03:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@Nhendrickson:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Male' Water and Sewerage Company Pvt. Ltd

I, Naufalu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. To edit the article to resubmit -Naufalu (talk) 03:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@Naufalu:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Urban Interaction Design

I, Brynskov, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hi, the draft is actually still in preparation. Sorry for being slow. It was never submitted, and, thus, never declined. Cheers, Brynskov (talk) 16:48, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@Brynskov:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:37, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

DJ Astro Black

This page was deleted before we were able to add any articles and write up that illustrates Astro's contribution to music and to young marginalized people. Astro does a lot of important work internationally and at home. We would like to be able to let others know about this work. -Wysinger Birds (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  • @Wysinger Birds:   Not done Hi Wysinger Birds. None of the issues you mention has any bearing whatever on the reason for the deletion. It is true that we require citations to reliable sources but the lack thereof did not contribute to the deletion basis, which was blatant promotion under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. What you wrote was a commercial – a transparent piece of advocacy, crowing the greatness and virtue of the subject. Writing like that has no place here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:49, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Vopop/sandbox

I, Vopop, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vopop (talk) 16:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

@Vopop:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:52, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Manav Mahapatra

He is A Dubbing Director click the "Save page" button below -siddiqpatel (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

@Siddiqpatel:   Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people - see, in particular, WP:CREATIVE. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 09:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Mike Knight (boxer)

I, Undefeated123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Undefeated123 (talk) 08:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

@Undefeated123:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Slow Roast Records

hi, our image was deleted in June because I did not properly label it but we do indeed own the copyright to the artwork - it would be great if it could be added. I will check to add the proper copyright if it can be readded. Thanks! -Elmurphy9 (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

@Elmurphy9:   Done File:LudwigLogo.jpg has been restored.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:22, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Greenwill

its is not promotion or advertising also GREENWILL is a non-profit, global environmental initiative with members in over 60 countries. It provides free Green Policies and Green Guidelines to its members. "Save page" button below -80.98.71.86 (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. One can still promote an initiative, as you're doing above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:28, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Bioasis Technologies Inc

I, 142.103.207.10, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 142.103.207.10 (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done This was a blatant copyright violation of this and this and this and others. It was also so brazenly promotional that even as a draft, where we usually give some more leeway, it would properly have been deleted on sight.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/CFE_Federal_Credit_Union

I, 208.95.168.50, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 208.95.168.50 (talk) 19:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done This was a blatant copyright violation of this and this if not others (it was also brazenly promotional).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:34, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lewis Romano

I, Tee nme, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I wasn't involved with the creation of this article so don't know why it was rejected. Because I have successfully edited a related article (SpotJobs.com) I have been asked to re-write/edit this article. Thank you. Tee (talk) 15:18, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

@Tee nme:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:53, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LONDON Advertising

I, 31.221.85.250, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. article was declined due to lack of notability and the sources used being unreliable, I would like to restore the article so I can edit it in order to make the article fit the required criteria 31.221.85.250 (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Philip Schwalb

Page, entirely verified via major publications (NY Times, Sports Illustrated, Wall Street Journal) has existed for at least 6 years and was deleted by antagonist with a "personal issue" without bona fide reason -24.227.126.2 (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done The article has a long history with copyright violations, which is why it was deleted for the third time. In fact I've permanently salted it to prevent that from happening again. If the subject is truly notable then please create a draft via Articles for Creation so it can be checked before going live. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:John Meed

I, Johnmeed, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Johnmeed (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

@Johnmeed:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:49, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bicycle Alliance of Washington

I, BarbChamberlain, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BarbChamberlain (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

@BarbChamberlain:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:29, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Very Extreme Hacking

This article will be usefull to people and its not like promotional So Please restore my content i need to work on it -Jason Springfield (talk) 05:12, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done Even if the promotional concerns are resolved I can't see where this particular term would ultimately pass notability guidelines. Being useful isn't a reason to keep/have an article on Wikipedia (WP:ITSUSEFUL) and you'd have to show where this term and the linked website would pass notability guidelines as a whole. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Princess Clark-Wendel

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -71.62.105.84 (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

The Orbital

The Orbital is the student publication for Royal Holloway, University of London. The Wikipedia page contained a significant amount of historical information about the publication that's been in existence since 1989. This information is not contained or stored in another central location. For that reason its deletion is a disservice to the philosophy of Wikipedia. Your help restoring this page would be very much appreciated. -194.60.38.25 (talk) 14:20, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Orbital, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
  • On a side note, an organization's existence does not automatically mean that it is notable. Longevity does make it more likely that there will be coverage in reliable sources, but it is not a guarantee. Also, the usefulness of an entry (WP:ITSUSEFUL) is not a reason to keep a page in and of itself. If you do ask for its restoration on the admin's page or on DRV, you will need to provide sources to prove notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mario Camilleri (Senior)

I, CharlieTheCabbie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore and move this page to my userspace please, I do intend to work on it but other things have simply taken over on WP. Thanks :) CharlieTheCabbie|paġna utenti|diskussjoni 11:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:11, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Carsten K. Rath

I, 37.34.74.173, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 37.34.74.173 (talk) 08:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Terradise

Still Researching and editing -Djhaldeman (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

See above - the article Terradise has not been deleted and is not proposed for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Bhavna Limbachia

This page is NOT about myself it is about a UK Actress who starts in the UK BBC Comedy Citizen Khan I understand the rules of Wikipedia and have not created a page about myself. I would like to know how you came to this? -Limbachia (talk) 15:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

@Limbachia: this page is only for requesting restoration of articles that have been deleted, and Bhavna Limbachia has not. To answer your question: all new pages are looked at by volunteer New Page Patrollers in order to filter out advertisements, attack pages, copyright violations etc, and to flag articles that need attention. Your user name naturally suggests that you are the subject of the article, or are related to her. I suggest that you read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and explain on the article talk page what connection you have with the subject, if any. JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done The page has since been deleted as a G7 (after you posted this here), but I do note that it was also at AfD so if you do re-create this then you will need to show coverage in reliable sources to prove notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Southhindimovies:Manav Mahapatra

I, Southhindimovies, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. -siddiqpatel (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC) siddiqpatel (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  • I would also like to warn you that your username implies that you are involved with the person or a specific corporation. It's not so bad that I'll block you, but I would recommend a username change. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ebin George

I, Rajeevsujas, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rajeevsujas (talk) 10:38, 6 January 2015 (UTC) I want to modify the article as this person has more notability now -Rajeevsujas (talk) 10:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done I was going to restore this, but the issue I have is that there are several areas that are written in such a non-neutral point of view that they come across as promotional. I'd recommend against having an entire section talking about George's spirituality and how he wants to serve God, as something like that should only be a brief mention unless George's spirituality has been extensively covered in reliable sources independent of George. The same thing goes for the long sections about his personal background and upbringing: stuff like that should be summarized and really only covered in any depth if it is extensively covered in independent reliable sources (WP:RS). I'd also recommend avoiding headings like "NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE - Performance for the World Record" because those also come across as promotional in tone. Even if you do add more sources to show notability the article would still require a complete and total re-write to fit Wikipedia's WP:NPOV guidelines. I'd also like to give a slight warning: world records don't always grant complete notability- sometimes they can if they are widely covered enough or recognized by an organization that is trusted by Wikipedia, but the whole reliability thing is key- there are sadly a lot of places that will claim to recognize you for a world record but it's really just about putting money in their pocket. (The Guinness Book of World Records has come under fire for this as of late.) I also have to say that I'm somewhat concerned about his notability as a whole since I don't really see any true coverage in a quick search, but I have no problem with you trying to create a new AfC entry. I'm just skeptical that the guy would ultimately pass the admittedly very strict notability guidelines on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Marcus de Maria

I, Willr21, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Willr21 (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Cultivated Indian English

I do not want it to be deleted because some Indians do use this way of speech -202.142.115.70 (talk) 11:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

This article has not been deleted: deletion is being discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Cultivated Indian English and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. The article cites no references: these are necessary (a) because of the Wikipedia:Verifiability policy, summarised as "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and (b) because Wikipedia has an inclusion test called Wikipedia:Notability which looks for evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 12:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Animesh Tarodia

The page is on a great personality of Badnagar so I request you to undelete it.Please restore my page I want to work on it-Tarodiaa (talk) 12:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  Not done Hi Tarodiaa. This will not be restored. Wikipedia is not a social networking site. Your profile does not belong on Wikipedia at all, just like mine doesn't. Wikipedia only has articles on topics the world has written about. Since you aren't the subject of newspaper articles and sources like that, this page had no place here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Kappa Psi Epsilon

In addressing the reasons stated for deletion, the significance of the organization Kappa Psi Epsilon is it's standing on the Rutgers University Newark Campus as the oldest, still recognized, sorority on campus. Technically speaking, because the other two Rutgers campuses don't have recognized local sororities, it is the only remanding local sorority in the Rutgers University community. This can be verified through the 'Greek Life' pages of all three campuses. In addition, other Universities have their local organizations listed, with less significance such as Sigma Delta from Darthmoth College. It can also be reworded to address the issues of seeming "promotional." There is also the other Kappa Psi Epsilon which is located in California.-Aissalated (talk) 14:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Animesh Tarodia (2nd request)

This page should be restored because Animesh Tarodia is a great personality of Badnagar,Madhya Pradesh,India.And one more thing I had to work on it.. -Tarodiaa (talk) 13:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

@Tarodiaa:   Not done and will not be done - see above. You wrote that you "can be founded in every social networking site", but Wikipedia isn't a social networking site, it's an encyclopedia, and that's why it's not a place for you to write about yourself. You should read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. JohnCD (talk) 14:47, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Paraytec

I, 217.40.44.169, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 217.40.44.169 (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Daniel van Niekerk - Financial Advisor Uganda

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -David Lettermann (talk) 17:31, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

I would like to think the content is unbiased and truthful in nature. I actually referred to his previous employers AES Iternational and that of Sam Instone WIKI to make sure it all adds up nicely.

The gentleman does much for the people in Uganda and Africa, and a simple GOOGLE of the same would provide an avalanche of further information ---he most certainly does not need my help or WIKI for that matter in the marketing and advertising universes as h clearly dominated his niche already. If there is anything you'd like me to remove in order to comply, kindly let me know.

Dave

I could move it to your userspace for further improvement, but an article that cites press releases, other Wikipedia pages, the subject's own works, etc. does not constitute significant coverage by independent reliable sources. The article was also written in a non-formal tone that appeared to be intended to promote the subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maulana Samiruddin Qasmi

I, Noman2677, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Noman2677 (talk) 21:43, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Draft:David V. Johnson

The submission had not been edited in 6 months, however the subject in question has new and recent sources to back up its noteworthiness -50.115.105.62 (talk) 20:20, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ARC Solutions

I, April Callahan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. April Callahan (talk) 19:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Please remove the promotional tone, terms such as "living proof" and "our ecosystems" make it like an advertisement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Larry White

I, Musicworldone, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Musicworldone (talk) 19:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:07, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Kevin Weston Fottball Coach

Enter your article was not deleted properly. "Administrator" did not supply proper reasoning for deletion. -Britannijt (talk) 01:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Britannijt (talk • contribs) 18:55, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done WilyD has responded on your talk page. The article you ask about is called Kevin Weston football coach. The administrator who deleted it gave the reason as "deleted page Kevin Weston football coach (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement)". It seems to have been crated by a user called " Britanni T" presumably you. Mr X gave a clear explanation at the talk page: User talk:Britanni T. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

User:FDLeyda/Highlandtown Lake, Ohio

(talk) 16:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Contemporary Aesthetics

I, Aberleant, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aberleant (talk) 15:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:38, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irving Wohlfarth

212.194.190.114 (talk) 14:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

User talk:200.104.240.11/Harassment

Deleted with the false claim that it was an attack page. In fact, it was a record of a sustained campaign of harassment against me. The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided it will be used in a timely manner. 200.83.101.225 (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC) -200.83.101.225 (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done as the tone of the page is inappropriate, being more than a record. Please record this in your own private file off Wikipedia if you are going to want to keep it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
I do want to keep it, but it's very difficult to record it in my own private file when it's been deleted. Had I had any warning that someone wanted to delete it, I would have saved it. 200.83.101.225 (talk) 04:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greek Orthodox Folk Dance & Choral Festival

I, Nhendrickson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nhendrickson (talk) 03:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

I am still working on this article.} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nhendrickson (talk • contribs) 03:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done The first article has not been deleted. I've removed the pledge from the article because while you are not claiming it as your own work (which would make it a copyright violation), adding the whole pledge does come across as promotion for the group. I'd like to ask that you not re-add it to the article because of this. There's no reason to add the entire pledge to the article. As far as the other article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Greek Orthodox Folk Dance Festival (FDF), that was deleted because it was a copyright violation. We cannot accept copyright violations in any format and we cannot restore them. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Maithripala Sirisena.JPG

I got this image on my camera. A mad person deleted this file. -Chamath456 (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

  • @Chamath456: It looks like this was uploaded onto Wikimedia Commons and was deleted for copyright violations by User:INeverCry. If this is your image then you will need to do something to prove that this is your original work. Also, since this was deleted on the Commons I don't know that we would be able to specifically undelete it through here unless we have admin privileges on that site (I don't). I've tagged INeverCry so they can respond to this request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I'm pretty certain that it would need to be reuploaded locally. You can't move images between projects, I believe. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
The deletion rationale for c:File:Maithripala Sirisena.JPG was:

{{copyvio|1=This is a photoshoped version of an election poster - see http://regex.info/exif.cgi?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2F5%2F5d%2FMaithripala_Sirisena.JPG see this also https://www.facebook.com/maithripalas/photos/pb.365053451326.-2207520000.1420571533./10152931889656327/?type=3&theater}}

@Chamath456: you need to post an undeletion request at c:COM:UDEL. Some of the other mad people over there can have a look at it.   INeverCry 08:22, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Ubud Writers & Readers Festival

The page was speedily deleted being classified as promotional. However the information provided in the page is factual and correct, as taken from sources including the UWRF partnership report. -—Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC) -Hollyreid (talk) 03:26, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

  Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a G11. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Promotion is less an issue of sources and more an issue of the article's content. I expect this to be deleted again and the earth salted as this will be the fifth time it has been deleted. If you continue re-creating this article, you will very likely be blocked for the repeated re-creations. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  Not done too promotional Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Troll Station (YouTube Channel)

The article was unfairly and abruptly deleted without a sufficient, conclusive consensus. Also, I intend to work on it. -Edfilmsuk (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll Station (YouTube Channel), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user User:Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  • FWIW, I have no problem with the guy userfying the article to work on it if he wants, although obviously I did not close the AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Monday Nights with Tim and Anthony

I, Fourbytes, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fourbytes (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:18, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Turf HD

Turf HD is a notable company to the central Virginia area. It is providing unique, organic lawn care solutions that are new and innovative to this area. It should be considered as a wikipedia page. Please note that this page is not being used to advertise in any way, shape or form. -Decr8199 (talk) 14:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Not done there was no claim of importance or promotion on the page. However this request does have a promotional tone! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kristine Cecille Isidro

I, Russianrgsuperstar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Russianrgsuperstar (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tipovers, a game from the 1980's

I, Kjb14086, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjb14086 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Cannabis Science Inc.

Deleted by PROD, but the company is notable and I can provide refs. Please userfy. -Kindzmarauli (talk) 19:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

PRODs are generally restored as-is, no questions asked. (It's treated as if you were challenging the PROD.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
That would be fine too. Whichever is easier. Kindzmarauli (talk) 21:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Medical Marijuana, Inc.

Deleted at AfD. Company has become notable in the meantime. Please userfy. -Kindzmarauli (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adler bug

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)


Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Note to all of these requests by Hasteur. Admins may first wish to view the ongoing discussion at the admin noticeboards before deciding. Thanks! EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:20, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
    • So what you're saying is I'm not allowed to request G13 refund... What a totalitarian world we live in. Hasteur (talk) 04:22, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Hasteur, I'm willing to restore all of these but I want a promise that you will work on improving them (at least just a passing look for sources) so that they run a chance of passing notability guidelines. My concern is just that by all accounts the original editor appears to have abandoned the entry, so I doubt that they will be back any time soon to edit and improve the article, so I'm just worried that I'll be restoring the article just for it to sit for 6 months without any attempts to improve it (essentially re-abandoning and already abandoned AfC draft). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:38, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
    • Tokyogirl79 I'll make you a deal. I'll go through every single one of these drafts and give them a proper review (which I would wager some have not recieved). Any that have a chance at succeeding I'll do what I can to try and boost them to acceptance. Any that are not possible, I will put up for CSD/MFD/etc as applicable. That EoRdE6 still sees these as things that should be removed indicates that an editor experienced with AFC should look at. Hasteur (talk) 04:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Hasteur, good enough for me. I just want an assurance that they'll be looked at. I'll restore them now. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:43, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  •   Done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:45, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adobe FormsCentral

I, Hasteur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Procedural inquiry/request as user improperly nominated this for G13 when the last page edit prior to the user nominating was less than 6 months before. If this is not the case, please disregard. Hasteur (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_169&oldid=1141881584"