Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 143

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 140 Archive 141 Archive 142 Archive 143 Archive 144 Archive 145 → Archive 150

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Henry Strozier

I, Migastacos, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Migastacos (talk) 23:34, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:20, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

TeamCity

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Encyclopedant (talk) 21:51, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

This page is about a product made by an important global software tools company with many wildly popular products (IntelliJ_IDEA, for example). The page is linked to from many perfectly valid pages.

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

User:117.240.183.161

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 117.240.183.161 (talk) 07:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Please tell us what you want. What your IP has done in the past is at Special:Contributions/117.240.183.161 but there are no deleted contributions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Marko Stout.jpg

Permission recieved via OTRS (Ticket:2014042910016486) ---Mdann52talk to me! 13:51, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

  Done and deleted again after file moved to Commons. --Mdann52talk to me! 15:23, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Intellectual Capital

I, GioCM, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GioCM (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

I'd like to return and edit this page.

I was looking for some references - had to buy two books to be sure - an then go distracted (By working on an actual case involving Intellectual Capital)

Gio GioCM (talk) 20:29, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done. @GioCM: What is the relationship between this draft and the now deleted Intellectual Capital? Did you use any content from that page (sentences, etc.) or did you not know that it existed? This isn't a trick question or something like that, I need to know because if you did, I have to restore the history to maintain attribution. Protonk (talk) 22:04, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Room Nine Unlimited

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Van dazull (talk) 02:07, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Room Nine Unlimited

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:04, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done It's copyvio from this source. Even if the content is given up as fair use, the promotional tone of the writing would still make it necessary for you to re-write the material from scratch. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:11, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Tim Leffel

Hello, my name is Andrea. I upload and edit articles in Wikipedia in Spanish, and in these days I´m trying to begin in English Wikipedia. The editor of a page that has been deleted, asked me to attempt to restore it. This page was removed by an administrator with the following message: Expired PROD, concern was: Appears non-significant. References are mainly to self-published reviews, and I have appears to have Been a "runner up" to the awards. The editor has no experience and did not claim on talk page, only tried to restore the same page, obviously, with no success. He asked me if I can restore the page, following 100% Wikipedia rules. I would like to recover the original text to improve it, because the publisher does not have the file. This is possible? Thank you! -Ane wiki (talk) 22:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Ane wiki,   Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.--S Philbrick(Talk) 22:51, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anna Jean Cummings Park

I, Stevepiercy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevepiercy (talk) 21:29, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 22:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Fertility_Check

I, SnakeDogDev, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SnakeDogDev (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

I have reedited it -SnakeDogDev (talk) 15:05, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done no changes were made the last time it was restored, so if you want it back propose how you will improve it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:53, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mindscouts

I, Bschwendimann, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bschwendimann (talk) 16:30, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aiden Flowers

I, MandyeFlowers, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MandyeFlowers (talk) 17:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Ezzat Assayed Ahmad

Walfenburg International College Walfenburg International College — Preceding unsigned comment added by Same ahmad (talk • contribs) 18:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The page included a substantial copy of https://sites.google.com/site/drezzatassayedahmad/. Copying this would be a copyright infringement. If this page is your writing, then you can add a post to say that all the content is licensed under CC-BY-SA-3.0 on that Google site. However even if you did write it, it is much better if you rewrite this to more resemble a Wikipedia biography than a CV. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PokeBay

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 58.168.151.131 (talk) 05:36, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:18, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jonathan Menendez Benavides

I, 108.192.17.5, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 108.192.17.5 (talk) 18:42, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pakistan Chemists & Druggists Association

I, Mohammadasimjamilsiddiqui, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mohammadasimjamilsiddiqui (talk) 09:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedia

above mentioned article's request for undeletion is on solid ground basis, because we did not submit any information which could not be verifiable and also we did not violates any copyrights, because i am fully authorized to put our Association's information on Wikipedia and having a designation of "Secretary General" in this association. so therefore kindly approve our request for undeletion and also request to you that if you have any objection on the content then kindly inform me, we will try our best to remove your objections.

Regard,

M. Asim Jamil Secretary General of the "Pakistan Chemists & Druggists Association.

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I noticed that you had previously requested that it be restored back in December but did not work on it. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a place to permanently host articles and if another six months passes and the article has not been worked on in that time, you will likely not get the article back the next time it is deleted (assuming that you do not work on it). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dark Nova (band)

I, HamSaw, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HamSaw (talk) 12:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

  •  HamSaw Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

afrocurio

the page was my original work and not advertising in any manner, and the page was still under construction. and then click the "Save page" button below -Pizzel (talk) 13:54, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done and will not be done I don't think you understand the meaning of the word advertising, as that draft was pure advertising.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Collection Workflow Integration System (CWIS)

I, Cdwirz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cdwirz (talk) 16:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

I would like to add more sources and information to meet the Wikipedia standards for publication -Cdwirz (talk) 16:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Talk:The Seventh Brother

The page was deleted per "G8: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page". However, the article now exists, and the option to create a talk page for the article does not appear to be available. Not sure who locked the talk page from being created, but I would like to add this article to the relevant WikiProjects. Thanks! -Fortdj33 (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank You! Fortdj33 (talk) 18:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Rathnam

"Thomas Rathnam" wiki page is hosted in the Wikipedia site more than a year.

It has more than forty links to the websites. Most of the links are in working condition.

This wiki page was edited, corrected, updated by many Editors. Since it shows that the person is a notable.

Few Editors may updated the new and forthcoming projects.

As for my concern, "Thomas Rathnam" is a well known upcoming Music Composer. His films also released in 'Tamil, Kannada..." And his albums also released in "English, Tamil, Hindi...

So, it is not a fake one.

Wikipedia is appropriating the new up-comers and achievers.

Thanks to Wikipedia for hosting such a pages.

Hope Wikipedia won't delete this wiki page. Please consider my obligation. -Praisewinner (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)--Praisewinner (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

I.V.Chalapathi Rao

I.V.Chalapathi Rao is a renowned educationist in the state of Andhra pradesh in India. His literary contribution is amply given in the deleted page. -— Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.98.177.34 (talk) 14:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

  Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title! Are you sure that the page's title is correct, including the namespace prefixes (User:, Wikipedia talk:, etc.)? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ohio College Personnel Association

The article was deleted before because I was unable to edit it based on the idea that I was not able to gain a password from a person who had this position before in my organization. I would like to have it undeleted because now that we have a stable person to edit it and others to contribute we will be able to update this article often about our organization. -Ulbricak (talk) 20:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done I've restored the draft page. Please take a look at the comments left by the reviewing editor for what needs the most improvement before it may be moved into the mainspace and be an "article". Thanks. Protonk (talk) 20:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The 406

I, NSCRtruckFAN, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NSCRtruckFAN (talk) 02:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Please Undelete my article. I will be able to complete the page within the guidelines of Wikipedia.

Thank You

Scott

  •   Not done I'm declining this for two reasons: the first is that the deleted version is very promotional in tone and would require a complete re-write to meet our guidelines for encyclopedic-ness and NPOV. The entire thing would have to be scrapped. The second is that this reads like it is WP:COPYVIO from somewhere, although I can't find it at this point in time. I have no problem with you writing a new AfC, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Simon Hinton

I created the page Simon Hinton 5 years ago as this published writer and esoteric researcher is of major interest in the genre. The page has undergone a number of changes through the years and remains of public interest. Simon Hinton has a notable public profile and is regularly interviewed on radio, television and other media on his writings and work and ideas on the esoteric matters and the occult. The A7 deletion is unsatisfactory and I request the page be immediately restored. -Lucywills (talk) 00:22, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

  • You might be able to ask User:Seraphimblade to send a copy to your userspace. The only thing to remember is that before restoring this to the mainspace, you will have to show how the person passes notability guidelines by providing links to the interviews and coverage of Hinton and his work. Be aware that not all media sources are seen as reliable per Wikipedia's guidelines. Since Hinton writes about things that are considered to be fringe theories per Wikipedia norms, it is likely that many of the sources won't be considered to be reliable sources. Don't take this personally, as it doesn't mean that any given person has a bias against the writer or his topics, just that in many instances those websites/news outlets/etc don't undergo an editorial/verification process that we can vet. Sometimes even the most visible places can be seen as unreliable, as in the case with Coast to Coast AM, which cannot be used as a RS. As a result it's usually very, very difficult to find coverage for anyone that isn't extremely mainstream, which can be frustrating. A good idea, if you're looking to gain a userspace copy, would be to provide the deleting admin with sourcing to show notability. In many cases admins will be willing to userfy, but if they think that there isn't a good chance that the subject passes notability guidelines or that there aren't RS out there (in other words, that there isn't a reasonable chance that anyone could improve it), they will decline to userfy a copy. In any case, I recommend running sources through our reliable sources noticeboard at WP:RS/N, as that's an area where people frequently go to ask whether or not a source can be used. I would also recommend that you introduce yourself at Wikipedia:WikiProject Occult and ask if anyone can help you look for sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

List of Neighborhoods in Lincoln, Nebraska

I, Hanyou23, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. This list was moved from the main article, Lincoln, Nebraska and made as a separate list in order to simplify the main article. I'm a little baffled why it's been removed. Please restore and thank you! Hanyou23 (talk) 23:17, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The page hasn't been deleted, not really, it's just been moved to Neighborhoods in Lincoln, Nebraska. If you object to the new re-titling of the article, the proper place to bring this up would be at WP:RfD. But first, it would be better to talk this over with the person who moved the article, User:CrunchySkies. It looks like this was done due to naming conventions and the expectation that the article would move beyond a list-type article, so discussing this with CS would be a good idea before doing anything else. I've tagged them so they can be aware of the request, but the discussion should take place on the article's talk page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jennifer Lazlo Mizrahi

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Crmarx (talk) 14:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC) 16:06, 4 September 2013 Sphilbrick (talk | contribs) deleted page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jennifer Lazlo Mizrahi (G13: Abandoned AfC submission – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND/G13)

  Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SETINVESTIGATES.COM

It is total crap that someone deleted the page for SETINVESTIGATES.COM. Most likely it is because mainstream media doesn't like being challenged by an upstart Web based news service that has kicked their ass for the past two years. The fact that a page about a legitimate news agency is deleted by Wikipedia shows that Wikipedia isn't as great a resource for information as it touts. Yes, I am upset because I worked to get someone to try an resolve this issue a year ago. I don't understand all of the coding crap and I tried to get the jerk who deleted the page to help. That didn't work. Hopefully, someone will take action and restore the page. Maybe, you can go to the Web site and look to see that it is real. Maybe you can freaking Google "SETINVESTIGATES Awards" and see that the site have ben recognized for its work. But I doubt it.Btnbilliards (talk) 13:34, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done. The page was deleted because it hadn't been edited in 9 months and article drafts are not an indefinite holding space. I can't see where you "tried to get the jerk who deleted the page to help" but if your message to them conveyed that sentiment I can't imagine they felt too compelled to help. There's no grand conspiracy to bury this site or any others, just a draft process where an editor determined that the page was not likely to meet our notability requirements. Protonk (talk) 13:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 91.193.144.113 (talk) 13:44, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Which article were you trying to have restored? I don't see any article in the contributions for 91.193.144.113, deleted or otherwise. Did you edit it under a different IP or an account? Protonk (talk) 13:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/F.C WILD ROVERS

I, Marco aust, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marco aust (talk) 20:46, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done Marco aust - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:12, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jewel A Rob

I, Jewelarob, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jewelarob (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

  • @Jewelarob: Am I assuming correctly from your username that you are editing an article about yourself? Protonk (talk) 19:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
      Done, draft restored. It's obvious this is a vanity autobiography. In which case, WP:AFC is the proper place to work on it. On the remote chance that the subject might actually be notable at least regionally, I recommend that Jewelarob refrain from submitting the article for review until the promotional puffery is expunged and until it complies rigorously with Wikipedia:Golden rule. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
    Cool beans. I was planning on restoring it after finding out for sure w/ the standard disclaimer about the rough road for autobiographies in the mainspace, but the order of operations doesn't quite matter here. :) Protonk (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/Isn't It Romantic? 2013 Short Film

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Isn't It Romantic? 2013 Short Film GCinCT (talk) 00:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 00:40, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Spirit of the Rainforest: A Yanomamo Shaman's Story

I would like to edit further -HodgeBrad (talk) 02:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. see previous entry. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spirit of the Rainforest: A Yanomamo Shaman's Story

I, HodgeBrad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HodgeBrad (talk) 02:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

WP:REFUND/G13

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 31.168.103.115 (talk) 10:50, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

We cannot help you unless you tell us the name of the page your are asking about. There are no deleted contributions from this IP. JohnCD (talk) 13:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Vladimir Yarets

Article was prod'd in 2007 for lack of reliable sources. I'm recreating the article with sources that are currently in my sandbox. Would like to see prior text as a crib. -Brianhe (talk) 06:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. You can build on top. The PROD reason was "lots of blog entries but no reliable sources attesting to the notability of the subject", but that was 7 years ago. JohnCD (talk) 13:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Academia De San Bartolome De Taguig

Pls Do not delete this article because this is my school and this is my second school and I want to show this article to my classmates and other. thank you! click the "Save page" button below -LorenzGabriel (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done LorenzGabriel Sorry, but that is not a good reason for restoring an article which has no references, and many other problems. Consider trying again in the Draft name space, and asking for help at the WP:teahouse--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Miradore Ltd

194.136.136.165 (talk) 06:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Procserve

I, 217.68.73.180, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 217.68.73.180 (talk) 08:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This has been undeleted before and abandoned. If that happens again, it is less likely the deletion request will be honored.Save a copy offline, in case you are unable to work on it soon.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

"Jewish Motifs" International Film Festival

i was sure that the content of article was self-explanatory to the context of being 10-years old initiative in the important context of restoring Jewish culture in Poland. adding more references to article is a different thing and i agree. but it was deleted far too fast! - especially considering it was without discussion, only warning to me as author and it's summer time - people (even Wikipedians) go on summer holidays! :) i haven't had opportunity to react to warning message suggesting deletion. This is important initiative and with 10 years of history and proving its importance. I strongly believe it shall have an article on wiki, but also if it the article that had been there already (written by myself) demands improvements - please suggest which - please do revert it to my sandbox so i could work on it but not from scratch - this is too hard. so can i request undeletion ..or in worse case at least ask for userfication? please.. -Lantuszka (talk) 12:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Helly Luv

Please undelete so that proper page can be constructed. Was speedy deleted twice in the past 18 months. This artist has been covered by Reuters, Guardian, and Finnish, Turkish, and Kurdish papers. There is a DE wiki article. We would be well served to have a well sourced EN wiki article, and would have been better served by expanding the article instead of speedy deletion! -William Allen Simpson (talk) 11:40, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • The article was speedily deleted, partly because one edit accidentally removed all the content except for an image. However, the version with the text was proposed for deletion, so I have userfied that version. I Moved it to Draft:Helly Luv2. Please note the existence of Draft:Helly Luv, perhaps some collaboration is in order. --S Philbrick(Talk) 15:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dan Raveh

I, Anibator, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anibator (talk) 16:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Anibator: Needs a lot of work, including explanation of why subject is notable S Philbrick(Talk) 16:26, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

gamara construction

Gamara Construction Company is a leader in providing value-added construction services to our customers by creating a successful partnership with them throughout the construction process.
Our pledge is to establish lasting relationships with our customers by exceeding their expectations and gaining their trust through excepti
-Apurv vasvelia (talk) 16:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  Not done and will not be done. You have got to be kidding. That article was not an encyclopedia article, it was an advertisement, clearly violating Wikipedia's policy prohibiting promotion. Your undeletion request here is also an advertisement. Your "pledge" is irrelevant.
You clearly have not read, or failed to comprehend, Wikipedia's guideline about conflict of interest. You also should read Wikipedia:Golden rule to learn the basics of what is required by a Wikipedia article.
This isn't Facebook or MySpace. It's an online encyclopedia. Not a business directory. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nishita Goswami

I, Mask2blu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mask2blu (talk) 16:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Previously I didn't have all the materials regarding the article. I want to continue with the article and update it with the necessary content. -Mask2blu (talk) 16:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ShowSlow

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Shashank.Superone (talk) 18:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 18:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Nimrod_(programming_language)

-204.128.192.32 (talk) 18:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Nimrod is a programming language of growing relevance and popularity as evidenced by its recent front-page appearance on Hacker New. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8048014

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Netcom, Inc

I, Illinois60614, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Illinois60614 (talk) 18:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

@Illinois60614:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Netcom, Inc

I wish to edit, update and expand upon article - It was deleted because it was not edited soon enough. -Illinois60614 (talk) 19:00, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done It was never an article, only a draft that you have already requested above the panda ₯’ 19:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

FlexRAID

This page needs to be restored as it was deleted due to lack of understanding of the technology presented. The software is being used by more than 10,000 users worldwide. It is not well known only because it spread word of mouth and isn't publicized. However, it represents a significant technology innovation that should be documented. Google "FlexRAID" and/or visit its user forum to understand that it is a real technology representing a valuable approach to storage data protection. If something needs to be well known before it can be on wikipedia, then the site has little informative value. Please restore the page. -Spectwiki (talk) 04:11, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

  Not done Understanding of the technology is irrelevant to whether it warrants an article. It being a significant technological innovation is irrelevant to whether it warrants an article. That it's real is irrelevant to whether it warrants an article. Being well known is also irrelevant to whether it warrants an article. The issue is that an encyclopedia is a tertiary source and as such it details what is already known through previous publication in the wider world – not "well known" – but already published in reliable sources. That is absolutely necessary because a tertiary source encyclopedia can only report on existing knowledge, and is never properly for announcing new things or the platform for original publication. If sufficient reliable sources unconnected to the subject do not exist from which a verifiable content can be written, then Wikipedia should not have an article because of the very fabric of what it is. In any event, this page is only for requesting uncontroversial undeletion; no article deleted after debate on the merits at a deletion discussion is ever undeleted here, as is prominently announced at the top of the page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:28, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

I think it is important to understand that the page was deleted without participation of those that understand and know of the technology. Why is it okay to document BeyondRAID and Drobo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drobo) but not okay to document FlexRAID? FlexRAID is documented on many external sites (http://assassinhtpcblog.com/server-flexraid/, https://wiki.amahi.org/index.php/FlexRAID, http://www.havetheknowhow.com/Configure-the-server/Install-FlexRAID-v2.x.html) and even compares against technologies such ZFS and others (http://snapraid.sourceforge.net/compare.html) and heavily discussed in many forums (a simple Google search will bring many). Again, it is an important technology being used by more than 10,000 users around the world. To say, should not be documented in an Encyclopedia is short sighted. Every other technology is competes against (ZFS, BeyoundRAID, unRAID) is on wikipedia. The very simple fact that it is misunderstood so far as to delete its wikipedia page itself demands that it be better recorded. Please restore the page. If edits are required, they will be made. FYI, FlexRAID has several patents pending. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spectwiki (talk • contribs) 21:05, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. As Fuhghettaboutit says, and is it says at the top of this page, this is not the place to dispute the results of a deletion discussions. This article was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlexRAID. If you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you should contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Lankiveil (talk). After that, if your concerns are not addressed, you may apply at WP:Deletion review.
The question is not whether the technology is understood; it is whether other people, independently, have thought it significant enough to write about it in reliable sources, see WP:Notability (summary). In regard to all the other products, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. JohnCD (talk) 22:03, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

For reference, this is the third request posted by Spectwiki.

Each time, Spectwiki has been informed that the proper procedure is to take the case to WP:Deletion review if the deleting administrator declines to restore the article. And each time, we have a case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT from Spectwiki.

@Spectwiki:, be advised that repeating a request that has already been denied multiple times will not result in the article being restored. Your vexatious requests have crossed the line into WP:Disruptive editing and WP:Tendentious editing, and will lead to a long-term block on your account. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

If something needs to be well known before it can be on wikipedia, then the site has little informative value. The editor obviously has no idea how Wikipedia works, which might be the reason for the repeated requests. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Again, this is the first true follow up on the topic. I am not familiar with wikipedia procedures and never got notice of the previous responses on the request. In fact, I thought no one was replying. The whole system is confusing and these discussion need to take place under a much better collaborative platform where history of discussions can be properly tracked. So, "vexatious requests" is an overreaction on your part. So, enough with the dramatization of the facts. You might have access to the history of the request, but I don't (or at least don't know where to access it). I have never gotten a response from Lankiveil (talk) (at least I don't see any record of my request on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lankiveil). I will try contacting him again.

The statement that I did not provide a response is false, last time this was requested I responded within 24 hours at my talk page, the discussion which has now been archived. I don't really have anything more to add, unless reliable sources have turned up in the last couple of months since I last looked at this in depth, it would be inappropriate for me to restore the article as it will just be deleted again. Unfortunately it seems that WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT is the order of the day here. If anyone thinks I'm being unreasonable here I'm happy for this to be restored by another admin or to be listed at DRV for a wider view, but I believe both courses of action would lead to the article rapidly being deleted again and wasting everyone's time. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:16, 17 July 2014 (UTC).

Lankiveil, apologies if you replied. I must have not gotten to your reply till it was likely archived. Again, the platform is confusing to me. I provided some sources on your page. These are independent companies write ups on the technology. If these don't qualify as reliable sources, can you please explain why and what constitute reliable source? On your page, I provided an Open source site where it is being compared: http://snapraid.sourceforge.net/compare.html Custom system vendor where it is being explained: http://assassinhtpcblog.com/server-flexraid/ The company's site: http://www.flexraid.com Yes, many of the references when doing a Google search are on forums and blogs (all independent). Again, the page was originally created by this user: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smurf-IV/Toolset FYI, I am keeping a browser open on the topic as to properly follow it up to avoid what has happened in the past. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spectwiki (talk • contribs) 14:24, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • @Spectwiki: there's no need to keep a browser tab open. You can see the contributions for your account at the top right of the page (looks something like this. Clicking on that will bring you to Special:Contributions/Spectwiki. Each of those may point to a page that has been archived (if you wait too long in checking back or replying), but even then you may look at the page history to find a reply. I realize that's a pain sometimes but it's a function of the software and not likely to change in the very near term.
  • You should look at our guidance on reliable sources which generally excludes forums and blogs. As such, noting that forum and blog posts exist about the subject isn't going to change anyone's mind. I'm also not sure you've been reading what Lankiveil has said carefully enough. The article was deleted through a deletion discussion, which means we can't just unilaterally overturn it. Adding more evidence here (unless it was incredibly strong) doesn't change anything and waiting for a reply here to change that will be pretty fruitless.
  • Your best bet is to make a draft article (see articles for creation on how to get started with that) on FlexRAID and try to resolve the issues at hand in the deletion debate, namely that there don't seem to be enough independent, reliable sources to build an article which meets our core content expectations. If you want help doing that or understanding our guidance on sourcing, let me know. Protonk (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

@Protonk Thanks a great deal. That was very informative. As mentioned, I was fairly loss navigating through the platform and really did not see the replies to the inquires until now. I will follow your advice and work on creating the draft article and attempt at addressing much of the raised issues. Where do I submit the draft article for review when ready? Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spectwiki (talk • contribs) 21:10, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

@Spectwiki: Left a note on your talk page. We can continue the discussion there so this section can eventually be archived. Protonk (talk) 21:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiabulls_housing_finance

As per your message for deletion of our page due to marketing content, we would like to tell you that the page doesn't have any content that promotes the Company or its services. We have created the page by referring to the content of other players in the Industry for instance HDFC and SBI. Infact we have taken idea from the said pages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Housing_Development_Finance_Corporation, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Bank_of_India)and drafted our content in a similar way.

The content is purely based on the facts and figures of Indiabulls existing wikipedia page. We would appreciate if you could help us exactly locate the words/phrases/sentences that is not according to the guidelines of the wikipedia so that we can revise the same and submit it again -Sachin wiki123 (talk) 11:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The existence of other content doesn't justify your content; your article still has to abide by Wikipedia's policies (such as WP:Neutral point of view). If you have any affiliation with the subject, you are obligated to disclose that affiliation. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:28, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
@Sachin wiki123: I'll also note that Housing Development Finance Corporation should not be viewed as a good model. State Bank of India is somewhat better, but neither resemble the version that was deleted. For better models, look to Wikipedia:Good_articles/Social_sciences_and_society#Economics_and_business, which includes several banks. You do not have to match the work done on those articles to be accepted, but better to look to a good article than a borderline one as a "template".--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Furthermore, because Sachin wiki123 clearly has a WP:Conflict of interest regarding the subject of the article, it would be best to write a draft article and submit via Wikipedia:Articles for creation rather than attempting to publish it in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Rathnam (2nd request)

1. This wiki page is hosted in Wikepedia more than a year. i.e for a long period, 2. It has more reliable web links. 3. Most of them are Third party web links 4. The person is already a popular figure. His films were released in theaters and run successfully in Tamil, kannada... 4. His English albums were released in MTV, SS music channel and so on.. 5. You may see it in video channels, news links.. 6. This pages were edited by many authors, may be due to interest to update the page. The edit itself shows the notability of the person. 7. May be few updates may be done by their own interest. If it don't have viable links that paragraphs only to be deleted not all. That is the whole page. 8. Wikipedia is keeping the records for reference to the public, to the honour.. 9. so, pl avoid the deletion and re host it -Praisewinner (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)--Praisewinner (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

  Not done It was already explained to you above why this won't be restored. Requesting it again serves no purpose. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_143&oldid=1138663718"