Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 134

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 130 ← Archive 132 Archive 133 Archive 134 Archive 135 Archive 136 → Archive 140

Film Scores

Required for project and then click the "Save page" button below -101.167.23.32 (talk) 09:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done That article is not up for deletion, nor has it been deleted. Your sole edit there was not accepted, but other than that, there's nothing to undelete the panda ₯’ 09:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Sabella (company)

Sabella is a well-known company in the (small) field of tidal energy. It is the only 100% French tidal turbine developer. It immersed the first underwater tidal turbine in France in 2008 and will install an industrial scale turbine in end of 2014 which could be the firt grid-connected tidal turbine in France. This article was providing useful information for people interested in the tidal energy sector and especially the french context. Many informations about Sabella from independant sources exist, unfortunately often in French. -Gourlen (talk) 09:52, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabella (company), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. the panda ₯’ 09:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thane Jain Yuva Group

I, Adarshmadrecha, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adarshmadrecha (talk) 07:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Lucas Browne

I noticed that when I recently created the Lucas Browne article that it was article that had been previously created, and then deleted as at that time, he was a minor Mixed martial artist. However, Lucas Browne has become notable in accordance with WP:NBOX, as he became Commonwealth Heavyweight Boxing Champion on 26 April 2014, i.e. an inter-continental title, with the Commonwealth Boxing Council being affiliated to the World Boxing Council. Best Regards. -DynamoDegsy (talk) 15:57, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done. The most recent version of the article clearly did not qualify for deletion under WP:CSD#G4 because the content was substantially different than the article deleted at WP:AFD. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:58, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rubin415

Streetartnerd (talk) 17:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Don't Let the Music Stop

I just have to let you know that I am not blocked anymore, because I am set free, so I created a new story behind Larry Santos' lost 1977 pop album, "Don't Let the Music Stop" and also I inserted an article of him when he was behind the big sheet music that nobody had before. can you please undelete the article that I already uploaded once for that story? Thank you. -Maitlandplace (talk) 19:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Take care and good luck. Laurie MaitlandMaitlandplace (talk) 19:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Ullanda McCullough (album)

I just have to let you know that I am not blocked anymore like I was back then as long as I read the directions carefully, so I inserted an article about an R&B/soul singer/backing vocalist, named, Ullanda McCullough, which can be used for the story about her second self-titled album. Can you please not delete the article that I already uploaded, which can be used for the story in the end? -Maitlandplace (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks and take care. Laurie MaitlandMaitlandplace (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Andrew Stone (footballer)

I nominated this page for deletion a month and a half ago, but the player now meets WP:NFOOTBALL since he played this past weekend. See here. – Michael (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done, article restored. Please insert the reference ASAP. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Is this appropriate given that User:Mikemor92 had already asked User:Spartaz who closed the AFD to delete it, and he declined, and asked that it go to DRV instead? (though perhaps better if User:Mikemor92 would stop wasting our time asking for the deletion of fully professional players just before the start of the season, who have just been signed, and are almost certain of playing soon). Nfitz (talk) 20:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Concerto for Pedal Steel Guitar and Orchestra

I, 71.189.126.157, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 71.189.126.157 (talk) 20:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

forgot some brackets then spaced out. Should be a quick fix -71.189.126.157 (talk) 20:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Mary_Jo_Foley

notability meanwhile achieved as technology journalist (for example : http://www.zdnet.com/topic-steve-ballmer-the-exit-interview/) -基 (talk) 11:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

If possible please move to a user subpage ( ...User:ChristophThomas/Mary_Jo_Foley) to allow reviewing / updating the article before publishing it. Thank you ! --基 (talk) 11:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

The page has been deleted on May 7 2008 : 00:44, May 7, 2008 Golbez (talk | contribs) deleted page Mary Jo Foley (A7 (bio): Real person; doesn't indicate importance/significance)

Ronnie Lee Smith

Mr smith Is a counterculture hero with a wide following. He has an imdb credit along with having run for political office and having a long career in civil disobedience. Because he was engaged in civil disobedience, some of which could land him in jail, he was not as highly publicized in life as he could have been. His friends and followers now respectfully request to allow him to continue to educate people after his passing in a more public way. ~breezy kiefair -Breezy Kiefair (talk) 18:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that we don't accept any wikis - including IMDb - as sources for anything. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronnie Lee Smith, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kinu (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:47, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

EnerSys

Page was deleted for highly promotional tone in some aspects which could have then been deleted themselves instead of the page. Also it was deleted for no secondary sources but it linked directly to the companies website. What second sources would exist for the company that don't direct to the website? I did not know of any so I assumed it would be acceptable. This could have be rectified without deleting the entire page and by suggesting recommendations instead. All of the edits could have also been reversed to delete the information added could they not? The information was taken from the companies website description which may have led to a promotional tone. This is something that I can rewrite if the page is restored. This was my first edit so I guess I was unsure about some of the qualifications of being a page on Wikipedia but I think the company should be listed on there. -Rcblankl (talk) 18:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

The company is a primary source (A secondary source is a source with no connection to the subject what-so-ever). Please see WP:Identifying reliable sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

American Best Locksmith

I want to edit my article. Please, you can specify why the article was deleted -Ablocksmith (talk) 11:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done, because the article is irredeemably promotional. WP is not for promoting your company. --Randykitty (talk) 11:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/1000Bulbs.com

I, Tungstenlightbulb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tungstenlightbulb (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

  • After a quick web search, I don't think this unremarkable web-based retailer has any chance of becoming notable. They have not won any awards, they are not profiled in industry magazines, etc. The deletion should stand. Binksternet (talk) 15:45, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Caesar Augusta

This was new text on the Roman site that is not dealt with in "Zaragoza" which is already too dispersed to deal adequately with this important site. It will be derived from the Spanish site which has much on this topic -Rjdeadly (talk) 19:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done Actually the page you mention was a redirect (now deleted), the page I assume you are requesting undeletion for is Caesar Augusta (Zaragoza). That said, there is basically nothing to undelete, it had an Expand tag pointing to the article in the Spanish Wikipedia and two categories. There's no prejudice against creating this article, reading through the es.wiki article it seems it's a valid topic. But that's less than a stub. It's not uncommon to delete or redirect titles to more developed articles. So what I'd recommend would be to use your sandbox for example, or the draft namespace, work on perhaps a translation of the Spanish article, and then move it to Cesaraugusta, which would be the correct title. It's OK if it's a stub, but not just a tag saying "someone else should translate this". §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dee Dee M. Scott

  •   Not done As this person is living, we have certain standards and requirements for sourcing. None of your references meet those requirements. If you can indeed find suitable sources, please either create a new WP:AFC or a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT the panda ₯’ 23:00, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Proxy Robotics

This topic is evolving rapidly and will eventually meet the Wikipedia publishing criteria -Spinlock55 (talk) 22:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done. There does not seem to be a deleted article with this name. --Randykitty (talk) 11:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Apparently you meant Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Proxy Robotics · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. the panda ₯’ 23:15, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Proxy Robotics

I, Spinlock55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spinlock55 (talk) 22:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done, article restored, but it needs a lot of work. I made some changes to the lead section and minor formatting. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Need page restored to make adjustments needed for G13

I have previously relied on my in house administrators to manage my page please kindly restore my page in order for me to make adjustment to suit Wikipedia's G13 requirements. Thanks -195.78.19.66 (talk) 23:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done – You must specify what page you are talking about. EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Only just begun

this is an actual single released officially by the artist for her upcoming album and the itunes link IS used as a reference -Kesha Watson (talk) 20:42, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done – Unclear what you are requesting. There is an existing article at Only just begun. You have not identified any deleted article for us to restore. EdJohnston (talk) 23:58, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/the PettyBreakers (Tom Petty Tribute Band)

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Pettybreakers (talk) 22:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/the PettyBreakers (Tom Petty Tribute Band)

  Not done and will not be done – The requesting user has been indef blocked for spam. EdJohnston (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Naquib Haziq

I think this may be a good way for me to express more about the biography behind myself.Besides that,I would also want my page to have bigger impact on most people to have more self-confidence and follow their dreams,like I did. -Naquib Haziq98 (talk) 16:59, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

The Wikipedia is not like Facebook, it is an encyclopedia that makes use of external sources to reference its articles. Are you famous? Have you been covered by actual media for things which we can check to see if it was notable enough? If not, then no, there is not reason to have an article on you here. Your time would be better spent contributing to existing articles within topics that are of interest to you. Tarc (talk) 17:08, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  Not done – Per Tarc. EdJohnston (talk) 00:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Talk:OpEdNews

Main page was deleted by AFD and restored after another AFD; talk page was not restored at the same time, and a new talk page was later created. Old talk page history should be restored for merge from history into new talk page, and for page background. -Frieda Beamy (talk) 21:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done – If you check the talk page history, you'll see that the missing revisions have been restored. It's up to consensus whether the old material should be put in the main talk page, in a talk archive, or just left in the history. EdJohnston (talk) 00:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

ADDLite

Hi, I am sad as I had payed toward wilkipedia as a general public. And today I am developing a site to help SME called 'addlite' I thought to place it in wilkipedia and it was reported spam. It means that wilkipedia only promote big companies and not a small one. I have nothing to contest please delete my contribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devastotra (talk • contribs) 09:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done The article was written in an extremely promotional manner and there were also issues with notability. Articles must be written in a neutral manner and have sourcing to show that it passes WP:CORP. As far as you thinking we favor large companies, there are multi-million/billion dollar companies that fail notability guidelines quite spectacularly. Also, we are not here to promote anyone- we are here to write about subjects that pass our very strict notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:53, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

The Courtesans

Unfairly deleted by malicious user with personal vendetta against the band -Lstudholme (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. Note that the page was not deleted, just redirected. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:11, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Xoviell El Enviado x Cristo

Because I did not have no reference "Save page" button below -Xammy1986 (talk) 14:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Also note that we don't accept non-English articles (as this is the English Wikipedia).   Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a G11. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The article was deleted as I was typing the struck section above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:13, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Freeletics

Hello again! Please undelete and userfy. I seem to be finding a lot of these lately, and this one may have nothing salvageable, but at least I found RS (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung) that indicate 500,000 users, contrary to the deleting admin's information. Thanks, I trust you to use your judgment. -Frieda Beamy (talk) 17:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eagles & Aliens

I, Erykwithay, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Erykwithay (talk) 17:36, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NASROLLAH MOGHTADER MOJDEHI

I, Ammojdehi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ammojdehi (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

  Note: I've talked to Sphilbrick (talk · contribs) about the deletion; according to him it's a bog-standard G13, so it is restorable. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:35, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
I've restored it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Junior Red Cross,Maharashtra State Branch

The page has not violated any copyright matter of Any Website.The Website puneredcross.org/jyrc is a branch of The Junior Red Cross,Maharashtra State Branch and has full right to use the Article.So the Article shouldnot be deleted. -Cpmalkani (talk) 05:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done There are several issues. First is that we cannot accept copyright violations. You can say that you have the right to post it here, but until a ticket is submitted to WP:OTRS, the content is still considered to be a copyright violation. Secondly, taking the content directly from the website also makes the article read as a promotional article for the branch. Even if the Red Cross gives up complete and total rights to everything they wrote on their website as fair use, it will still need to be re-written to meet our standards for neutrality per WP:NPOV. Finally, I didn't see anything to show that this specific branch of the Red Cross is particularly noteworthy. Not every branch of the Red Cross is notable and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by it being part of the Red Cross. You need to show where this specific branch has received coverage in secondary sources to show notability. Notifications of events or WP:TRIVIAL coverage does not count. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Glenn Cooper

Glenn Cooper is a full time author. He has published 7 books in 40 countries and 36 languages. He has sold over 6 million copies world wide. At the time this Wikipedia Article was written Glenn was a part time author who was the CEO of a Massachusetts biotechnology company. My understanding is that the page was deleted because it did not have substantial evidence that he was in fact an author. Here are some links proving this fact.

www.GlennCooperBooks.com

http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/2902232.Glenn_Cooper

http://www.amazon.com/Glenn-Cooper/e/B002L10BFU

http://www.harpercollins.com/authors/35000/Glenn_Cooper/index.aspx

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glenn_Cooper

http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Keepers_of_the_Library.html?id=ItgRG_WbgqQC

http://eurocrime.blogspot.com/2009/05/review-library-of-dead-by-glenn-cooper.html

http://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/book-deals/article/45462-glenn-cooper-an-american-writer-only-europeans-can-love.html

http://www.randomhouse.com.au/authors/glenn-cooper.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.118.27 (talk) 03:16, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Cooper, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
  • On a side note, I'll say that getting published doesn't necessarily mean anything. We would still need coverage in reliable sources that are secondary of the author himself. Blog sources cannot be used to show notability except in extremely rare circumstances, such as it being the official blog of someone/someplace we'd consider to be a RS. For example, an article or review on the official ALA blog would be usable. A standard book blog review would not be usable. WP:PRIMARY sources such as the publisher page or official author website cannot be used, and we also cannot use database listings or social media-esque sites such as Goodreads. The Publishers Weekly article is really the only usable link out of the ones you have posted. The problem is that an author can sell extremely well and be popular, but that does not give or even guarantee notability in and of itself. It might make it more likely that someone will receive coverage, but it is never a guarantee. I've seen people land on the NYT bestselling list, yet still fail notability criteria overall. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:51, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Hispanic Choice Awards

The page was deleted after 6 months of inactivity and we'd like to resubmit it now -72.69.232.33 (talk) 15:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
  • I removed one problem section that came across as promotional. The term "robust and influential" comes across as WP:PUFFERY and doesn't fit our WP:NPOV policy. Other than that, the tone of the article is fine- but it still needs to be sourced. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Wendell Hines Jr.

I, Muzakpipe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Muzakpipe (talk) 20:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)==

  •   Not done - this page is a copyright violation. A good portion of it was copyvio, as you pasted one of his poems into the article. Please understand that no matter how good your intent was, we cannot accept or restore articles that contained copyvio. There was also a small amount of personal reflection on the poem, which doesn't fit our WP:NPOV and WP:OR guidelines. There was a very small section about the author himself, but as a whole this would need to be completely re-written and it's just better to start from scratch with this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:AFC article on "International City Theater"

My apologies! The article in question has since been posted on its own page as "International City Theater." I did not realize that I had left the earlier draft on the Articles for Creation page. 68.111.73.129 (talk) 00:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/International_Organic_Inspectors_Association

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 72.36.56.182 (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done This is awfully promotional in tone. It's not so blatant that it was an immediate "no" from me, but the article as a whole came across as a press release from the company. The further I read, the more I saw that the article would have to be re-written almost entirely to remove all of the weasel words and phrases that peppered every section. I feel slightly bad since a lot of work was put into this, but this really would be better if you re-wrote it from scratch and with help from Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

r.parthipan

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Opasa (talk) 02:38, 22 May 2014 (UTC) I have provided relevant references to support my contribution.

Articles for creation/Brian Peddie

  This was requested by 165.125.176.9 (talk · contribs), but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:12, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Some deleted uploads by User:Crankelwitz

Can you review the below deleted files, they were all uploaded by user User:Crankelwitz. Some of them were deleted as there was confusion as to whether uploader was creator. I take it this OTRS ticket relates to some of his artwork/uploads: PermissionOTRS|id=2012081210001617 as it was added on File:Fugue_for_the_Pepper_Players-2.jpg, and there's also ticket #2009092110050758 which was added on File:Curie_in_the_Kitchen.jpg for instance. It might confirm the identity of the uploader, which based on comments on the uploads and his talk page, I presume is Dave Baldwin. I am eventually looking to move them to Commons.

Files that were deleted - (list compiled from communications on his talk page):

and likely also

  • File:Amanda's Trail.jpg - a note on user's talkpage states: Re: /* File permission problem with File:Amanda's Trail.jpg */ the owner of the copyright, Greg Scott, sent an email message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org on 14 March 2013 stating that he has agreed to release the file under the given license. Crankelwitz (talk) 23:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Deadstar (talk) 08:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Those two tickets you mention are permissions from David Baldwin, but they don't connect David Baldwin with Crankelwitz. Neither ticket link to any file on Wikipedia, but rather link to Mr. Baldwin's own website. Crankelwitz never explicitly acknowledges that he is David Baldwin on his talk page, although the only reply he posted on his talk page doesn't deny it, either.
I find a total of 4 tickets from Dave Baldwin that don't provide permission for any of the deleted files listed above.
However, for File:Amanda's Trail.jpg I found ticket 2013031510000245 from a Greg Scott notifying that he is the copyright holder and "release it to David Baldwin (Crankelwitz) for use on Wikimedia under a GNU Free Documentation License." That is the only ticket on OTRS that mentions Crankelwitz, and suggests that Dave Baldwin and Crankelwitz are the same. I have restored that image, which had been deleted due to lacking evidence of permission. ~Amatulić (talk) 10:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I will leave a message for the user on his talkpage too. Deadstar (talk) 11:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
  Comment: I see that File:Amanda's Trail.jpg is of a modern sculpture, so it can't be copied to Commons unless there's permission from the sculptor too as there is no Freedom of Panorama in the US. Not sure if it can even be kept on en: wiki? Deadstar (talk) 11:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
You might want to leave a note for Sfan00 IMG who reviewed the image for copying to Commons. I must admit I'm not up on all the intricacies of copyright rules. It seems to be common sense that a sculpture on public display in a public open space can be freely photographed and no law is necessary to grant such permission. Anyway, according to commons:Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US#Before 1978, the freedom seems to depend on when the statue was put there. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:25, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
From what I gather, the sculpture was placed early 2000s link. I'll mark the image. Thanks very much for your help. Deadstar (talk) 07:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Ah. the OTRS here didn't cover the sculpture :( Thanks. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvation_sect

The sect has been in the news almost every day for the past month. One of the reasons for deletion was hateful content, yet I believe most of the content reflected Korean news reports. Yesterday the sect's compound was raided by 80 prosecution officers backed up by 1,3000 police officers: http://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/news/article/article.aspx?aid=2989539 The leader of that sect, and owner of the Sewol ferry that sank last month killing hundreds of school children, is now wanted. Police have issued a reward and the leader is believed to be hiding with sect members: http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2014/05/116_157690.html PeterDaley72 (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done and will not be done I'm going to rephrase this since it sounds a little WP:BITE-y. (You can read the previous version here.) Basically what happened here is that the original article authors wrote the article in a manner that was not really very neutral and the sources were not entirely reliable. While they might not have intended it to come across as an attack article, the tone and explicit detail made it easy for me to see where people would see it as an attack page (at worst) or as a page that was so casually written that it read more like a personal news blog entry (at best). The sources did include the Korea Times, but there were a lot of references to a self-published blog source (WP:SPS). Since we can almost never verify any given blog entry and most blogs are written with a specific viewpoint and do not undergo any sort of editorial oversight, blogs should never be used as WP:RS except in very rare circumstances, such as the official blog for the American Library Association. I understand that this is very frustrating, but the article's tone and sourcing made me very uneasy- as it did User:TomStar81 when you asked for userfication. In this instance it would be better to create a new article from scratch and to have people from Wikipedia:WikiProject Religion help you with this, preferably experienced ones since this can be a fairly sensitive subject. I can put the usable sources on your talk page if you wish, but I don't feel comfortable even userfying the article's history anywhere. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for that. You're welcome to email me the usable sources to petedaley@gmail.com PeterDaley72 (talk) 10:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Like Bridges We Burn

Would like to add more credentials and keep it available for others to edit. -71.170.105.10 (talk) 17:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

I hate to do this as it quite clearly fails WP:NMUSIC, but   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. the panda ₯’ 22:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Tata Medical Center

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -DorkDoctor (talk) 12:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

QualityUnit

I would like to be restored to my sandbox so I can work on it -La cate35 (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

  Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:La cate35/QualityUnit. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done The "article" as written was horrendously promotional, and about a company that has zero chance of meeting our notability requirements for companies. I'm additionally concerned about another key thing: block evasion. The original article was created by someone with obvious COI as they had a matching username. The second editor was blocked as a sockpuppet. I'm truly concerned that you're related to a) either of those two accounts, or b) the company itself. After, I cannot fathom anyone else wanting userfication of an "article" about such a non-notable business. the panda ₯’ 22:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Manish Kumar Singh

I am social worker and teach the poor people .So,profile on wikipedia is impotant for me ,so please donot delete my profile — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manishwiki99 (talk • contribs) 22:24, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done Unfortunately, this is not LinkedIn or Facebook - this is an encyclopedia of notable subjects. Although your work may be beneficial, you do not meet the very strict requirements for an encyclopedia article. the panda ₯’ 22:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Dr.Twister

Would like to update page and supply the needed references and cross-references on other wiki pages and use the old page as a reference to edit. Even if the content of the page is copied to my user talk to review it would be appreciated. -Jvj24601 (talk) 18:51, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done It's one sentence, ending with improper promotional link to his website. Nothing there worth resurrecting. It was, after all, deleted in 2005 the panda ₯’ 21:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, I was under the impression there was much more content on the page. Will start new page. Jvj24601 (talk) 23:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Viva Arriva (live album)

I created a new page about Larry Santos' live album that nobody had before, so please do not delete the article. -Maitlandsplace (talk) 23:57, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Laurie Maitland

  Not done, nothing to do. Please stop posting here, as you have done several times, about articles that haven't been deleted. The place you should be is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva Arriva (live album). ~Amatulić (talk) 04:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Just A Man (1969 debut album)

This is the new page about his first album i created, so please do not delete it. Thank you. -Maitlandsplace (talk) 22:49, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. Your repeated requests on this page concerning articles you created on non-notable subjects that haven't yet been deleted are considered disruptive. You have been blocked accordingly for Wikipedia:Disruptive editing. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/H G Hopkins & Sons Ltd

I, Davidwr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page and either history-merge it into the newly re-created page if the new page is based on the deleted one or put it in a new page such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/H G Hopkins & Sons Ltd (2) if it is a different page so that any useful content can be merged into the existing page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

GRE Biology Test

I, Xiaoshan Math, request the undeletion of this article as I intend to do further work on it; the preliminary information provided was going to be modified to suit the true nature of the GRE Biology subject test. I used the GRE Mathematics subject test page as a template since the information that is worthy of Wikipedia inclusion is of the same sort. -Xiaoshan Math (talk) 00:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Johnny Vazquez

Johnny Vazquez is the most legendary salsa dancer. He is even referenced on the Salsa page. He created the LA style of salsa dancing and won multiple competitions, including Mayan Salsa Competition 8 times in a row. I saw the page was deleted recently. It shouldn't have been. -2001:4898:80E8:ED31:0:0:0:2 (talk) 00:52, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Yousef Essmaeel

I, 104.34.174.237, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 104.34.174.237 (talk) 06:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Vertabelo

I, owsql, request the undeletion of this article. Concern that led to deletion was: Unsourced article, no indication of notability. Please restore the page as I intend to work on this article. I will add third-party sources on a topic. -Owsql (talk) 09:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.

Luiz Palhares

Mr. Palhares would like the page restored. We do not know why it was deleted -73.53.177.205 (talk) 10:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

  • It says that the main author of the article wanted it deleted, but I can't see where this was actually requested. (WP:G7 is pretty much only used when the primary author requests deletion and there have been no substantial edits to the page from any other editor.) I'm going to ask User:Julia W to weigh in on this, as she was the deleting admin. I'm not overly versed in WP:ATHLETE, but there does seem to be an assertion of notability via him winning competitions on the national level. My first inclination is to restore this and let any interested parties run it through an AfD, but I'll wait for a little more input since like I said- I'm not overly versed in notability guidelines for athletes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for contacting me, I have emailed both of you privately. Julia\talk 19:26, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

May I understand the reasoning for the deletion?

The reason was "G7. Author requests deletion" extra text given at deletion includes "not notable and severe lack of independent, reliable sources"
with more detailed criterion that you can confirm at WP:CSD: "If requested in good faith and provided that the only substantial content to the page and to the associated talk page was added by its author."
This kind of reason does not preclude creation by other users, however any new article will still have to comply with the policies. Being not notable would mean that an article should not exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank You. As the article on Mr. Palhares was very well written, would it be possible for me to recieve a copy of the of the deleted page such that I may edit it, and resubmit with appropriate independent references? I can create a Wikipedia account if necessary or I can provide my personal email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.193.216.150 (talk) 12:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Govardhan Gunnala

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gunnalag (talk) 10:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

I am just starting off my Wikipedia authoring and this page was a quick create to see how Wikipedia works. To build that page quickly I just had a copy paste of an excerpt related to my mention in one of the recent books. I will have an appropriate content to land on this page.

Also, on the other hand I'd like to have my page User:gunnalag redirected to Govardhan Gunnala. Please let me know if this is feasible in Wikipedia.

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. KillerChihuahua 16:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Rapper Chrome

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jayone3000 (talk) 16:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

This page is need to show the reference for Hypnotize Minds label and to show who they was referring to rap artist Chrome - Straight to the Pros and Chrome - Project Landlord album in their Discography

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
@Jayone3000: I just noticed you have a draft up at User:Jayone3000/sandbox. What you need to do is develop that, make sure it meets the notability guidelines and then submit for review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_134&oldid=1136434721"