Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Entertainment/2020 February 14

Entertainment desk
< February 13 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 15 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Entertainment Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


February 14 edit

Emma. edit

Anyone know why Emma. takes a period? SpinningSpark 17:58, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to be the official title per This Apparently the studio included the period in the official name of the film, and has directed media to do same. --Jayron32 18:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • That would be because she has gone through puberty. Why the movie title is styled with a full stop, I don't know, given that the title of the book does not have one. Fgf10 (talk) 18:31, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The story looks to be a period piece. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:32, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aaand that deserves another rimshot :) I've seen that kind of thing before. Romeo + Juliet is one example. MarnetteD|Talk 02:02, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
In the old days, seemingly needless periods were used a lot more often. In newspaper headlines, for one. And another example is when Comiskey Park opened in 1910, the sign over the main entrance read, "HOME OF THE WHITE SOX." ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:24, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The director says because it's a period film.[1] PrimeHunter (talk) 04:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do tell. Great minds think alike. (Or punny minds, anyway.) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 05:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
He's just trying to make a point.--Shantavira|feed me 09:04, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There are currently 111 title matches for 'Emma' on IMDB. of which at least nine are direct adaptations of the novel. I'd guess that this is a strategy to create a unique title string to minimise errors when linking from marketing material or in social media campaigns. Given that the best alternative is probably something like Emma! I think we got off lightly. Blakk and ekka 09:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's as may be, but media outlets are under no obligation to follow studios' style choices, and at least one has chosen not to do so [2]. --Viennese Waltz 10:44, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is this a style choice, though? Or a differently spelt title? If someone referred to the novel/movie What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? but omitted the question mark, wouldn't this be considered, well, incorrect? -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Movie producers do various weird things. Like spelling Seven (1995 film) as "SE7EN". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 02:31, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wait, so you're telling me it wasn't supposed to be pronounced "Sesevenen"? Iapetus (talk) 10:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hard to tell, since they never spoke the film's title out loud. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 12:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]