Wikipedia:Peer review/Dimple Kapadia/archive2

Dimple Kapadia edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because its recent FAC has been archived, and while it has significantly improved, there might be other issues worth addressing to make it better. Thanks, Shahid • ^Talk2me 16:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from Aoba47 edit

I am glad to see you have put this up for a peer review. While I do not believe I am qualified enough to provide much insight here, I have a quick question. I noticed that the infobox image is a file that was extracted from another image also used in the article. Is it okay to have both images used in the same article? I have never run across this type of thing before so I do not have an answer, but I just wanted to ask this. Aoba47 (talk) 01:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually not the same image! :) The one in the infobox is a cropped version of an image from the same event but not exactly the same one - you can find all the images on the commons page. I thought it would be nice to show an image of her overall appearance otherwise I wouldn't use images which are so similar. Shahid • ^Talk2me 07:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification and apologies for my mistake. I agree with your reasoning. Aoba47 (talk) 21:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A whole month now, this is pathetic!! † Encyclopædius 15:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, I think the article is in good shape after the FAC and particularly your source review. Right now it's comprehensive, well written and sourced. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]