Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Gosford Park/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:01, 7 August 2010 [1].

List of accolades received by Gosford Park edit

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Gosford Park/archive1

Nominator(s): JuneGloom07 Talk? 21:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This list has been a bit of a challenge. I found it with a single sentence of prose, a handful of references (with one of them being IMDb) and no infobox. Finding sources for this list has probably been the most difficult part of this task, as the film came out nine years ago. However, after a few days work I believe that this list now meets the criteria. I look forward to your comments. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 21:35, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 06:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—References 26 and 27 are the same. They link to http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com/pages/awards/2001awards which redirects to http://www.ofcs.org/ . http://www.ofcs.org/ is updated daily. --Dan Dassow (talk) 09:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. The website has been through an update since I added the refs, I should have archived them. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 12:02, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced four redirecting links with the equivalent non-redirecting links. --Dan Dassow (talk) 02:21, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Jujutacular ^T · C 16:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Foo awards saw..." Repetitive use of this sentence construction in the second paragraph (particularly the word 'saw').
"The films costume, hair and make up also earned three nominations between them." Should be "film's" (possessive) and makeup (one word, no?).

Jujutacular ^T · C 15:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thank you. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 15:45, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Comments adequately addressed. I also did a check for consistency between the main list and the infobox and a spot check of ~10 awards. Everything looks in order, good work! Jujutacular ^T · C 16:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I saw a few small quibbles (grammar, punctuation), but I could just fix them faster than I could outline them here. Courcelles (talk) 17:47, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the support and the fixes. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 22:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support-JuneGloom07 addressed my minor nit pick. I could not find any other issues with the list. --Dan Dassow (talk) 18:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support — The list looks good to me, though I did change "&" to "and" in the infobox for consistency. Also, there is quite a bit of duplicate linking in the References section, though I am not certain of the policy here and it does not bother me enough to oppose the nomination. --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the fix and the support. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 19:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 19:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Could link Best Original Screenplay to the appropriate Oscar article.
"two awards out of a possible nine that it was nominated for" neater to say "two awards from nine nominations" surely?
" He received a subsequent three more awards" ->"He subsequently received three more..."?

The Rambling Man (talk) 16:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed all, thank you for the review. - JuneGloom07 Talk? 19:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.