Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Archive/Voluntary

User Type Sanction
(quoted verbatim)
Special enforcement details Start date Expiration date
GPinkerton Topic ban Conditional to unblock (sanction drafted by the blocking admin), GPinkerton has agreed to a restriction from Islam and post-1453 CE Middle East Discussion 2020-12-14 Indefinite, minimum 6 months
Composemi Topic ban As a condition for being unblocked, COmposemi has agreed to an indefinite topic ban from creating redirects, appealable after three months of constructive editing. Per [1] and the ANI discussion.[2] 2020-06-19 Indefinite
LovelyAngel1990 Editing restriction LovelyAngel1990 (talk · contribs) is topic banned from editing about topics related to abortion. Discussion with agreement 2020-02-09 Indefinite, can appeal on or after 2020-08-09
Winkelvi Voluntary 1-way interaction ban Winkelvi (talk · contribs) has voluntarily entered into a one-way interaction ban regarding Nagualdesign (talk · contribs) Per this AN/I discussion 2018-07-15 Indefinite
GDP Growth Editing restriction GDP Growth (talk · contribs) is topic banned from editing about post 1932 American politics. User agreeing to the ban 2019-03-20 Indefinite, can appeal on or after 2019-09-16
Hhkohh Voluntary topic ban Hhkohh (talk · contribs) has voluntarily entered in a six-month topic ban, during which they are banned from adding any deletion discussion to any deletion sorting list. This voluntary topic ban is enforceable by blocks. Per this AN/I discussion 2018-07-18 2019-01-18
Rusf10 Topic ban Rusf10 (talk · contribs) is topic banned from directly tagging for notability, proposing deletion, or nominating for AfD, any article created by Alansohn or where Alansohn is a major contributor. User accepts topic ban on one condition; user's condition implemented by community consensus 2018-03-22 2018-09-22
Esoglou Voluntary topic ban
  • Esoglou will not make article edits or talk page comments regarding Eastern Orthodox teaching or practice.
  • Esoglou may add information about Roman Catholic commentary (positive or negative) on Eastern Orthodox teaching/practice. However, any such commentary must be clearly attributed, in the body of the article, to the specific individual or document making it. Moreover, any such commentary must be clearly identified as opinion, rather than as factual information about the nature of EO teaching/practice or its compatibility/incompatibility with RC teaching/practice.
Imposed per a discussion at WP:AN3, final version approved by LM and Esoglou here. Restriction was entered into voluntarily, but may be enforced by blocks. Modified on 25-May-2011 to allow talk page comments, per agreement of LoveMonkey and Esoglou. 2011-02-06/08 / 2011-05-25 Indefinite