Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Aam Aadmi Party
– New discussion.Aam Aadmi Party edit
– General close. See comments for reasoning.19 July 2013
 | Closed as Withdrawn. Guy Macon (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
| Closed discussion |
|---|
Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already. Location of dispute Users involved Dispute overview There is bitter conflict going on between my edits and his reverts. the user:Sitush seems to be aganst all my edits and does not ever seems to be supportive. many of my hard worked contributions are being deleted and I am being declared as biased Aam Aadmi Party supporter who is using wikipedia as a political broadcast base, which I am not. Even worthy incidents are being deleted. Instead of helping to improve articles, the user seems to misuse his powers and dispite repeated persuation, seems to aganst the very Article's right to be complete and worthy of being feature. Please Intervene into situation or else Wikipedia might loose many enthusiastic contributors. I can only contribute to topics which I know and if i know about Aam Aadmi Party, then I would only contribute there. Please look at my contributions and the other user's contributions in this regard and resolve the dispute. Have you tried to resolve this previously? Extensively Used Talk pages. Haven't reverted his reverts. Have tried my best to follow all the WPs which have been brought to my notice And completely tried to understan the other user's point of view. How do you think we can help? Review both our edits and the manner in which we used our language in talk pages and edit comments. Then resolve the matter so that I can positively contribute the wikipedia and topics of my interest from completely neutral point of view. Opening comments by Sitush editPlease limit to 2000 characters - longer statements may be deleted in their entirety or asked to be shortened. This is so a volunteer can review the dispute in a timely manner. Thanks.
Binksternet (talk · contribs) has reverted edits by the complainant,so too has Qwyrxian (talk · contribs) here. Rayabhari (talk · contribs) is among those who have expressed opinions contrary to the complainant on the article talk page. Tall.kanna has spread discussion far and wide - article talk, my talk, Binksternet's, Qwyrxian's etc - and more often than not they've come to realise the correctness of what they are being told, an example of which is this thread.They're getting frustrated, I understand that, but they've become virtually a single-purpose account after a lengthy absence from Wikipedia and the best thing they could do here is spread out a bit and/or take up genuine offers of explanation rather than going around like a bull in a china shop. I've said that they seem to have a large investment in AAP-related articles: the presumption would be that they are one of the many supporters of this almost-messianic movement but I don't think I've ever said that they are biassed, merely that not putting all their on-wiki efforts into one thing might be more rewarding in the long run. I am not the only one who has tried to explain how things are done but there is a limit of tolerance and the problems that have occurred have been both numerous and wide-ranging. - Sitush (talk) 21:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply] Discussion editPlease do not use this for discussing the dispute prior to a volunteer opening the thread for comments - continue discussing the issues on the article talk page if necessary.
Welcome to the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Though I am a regular volunteer here, I am neither "taking" nor opening this case for discussion at this time. I would like to comment, however: @Tall.kanna: It is a bit unfair to say "Just take a look at all my and another editor's edits, figure out which ones are in dispute, and help me with them." Because of that, you may find that no volunteer — and we're all volunteers here — is going to be willing to go to the effort to take this case. Let me suggest that you supplement your "Dispute overview" overview with a specific list of edits which have been thoroughly discussed between you and the other editor and which have stalled out. If possible, provide diffs as well. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 21:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|