Welcome!


Hello ZoppoT! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DrMicro (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Re bimodal edit

I have checked this formula in places other than the one you cited. Thank you for your correction. DrMicro (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Actually on reviewing the formula this is more complex. This depends on the definition of the kurtosis. Some defintions give the kurtosis of the normal distribution as 0 while others give it as 3. This is where the different formulae come in. The article probably needs both formulae with proper explanations as to which to use. DrMicro (talk) 00:13, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the link. I had read that paper before. I think most of the material in it is now on WP.
There is clearly a need to specify exactly what type of kurtosis is being used in the formula. I am inclined to agree with you over a correction factor to the skewness but I don't think anyone has studied the effect of introducing a finite correction factor into the formula. Without that I would be reluctant to alter this one or to propose a new one.
I now remember trying to decide which formula to use in the article. The literature is very confusing on this point. I chose the version that uses the usual measure of kurtosis rather than the one that uses the excess kurtosis. I probably should check which one gives the right value for the unimodal distraibution before I change (or do not change) anything on that page. DrMicro (talk)

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:BRAC Framework Idealized RT Pattern for Binding Retrieval.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:BRAC Framework Idealized RT Pattern for Binding Retrieval.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 13:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply